Home > Football > The mystery of Darren Bent's purchase and Damien Comolli's role at Spurs
by Pete Lyons-McCarthy on 28 October 2007
Email this Article (18) Comments
Free £25 bet when you register at
Official Merchandise Delivered Direct to Your Door
OK, before Juande Ramos and Gus Poyet begin hopefully the most productive partnership in the history of Tottenham Hotspur, I feel there are questions that need addressing so the same fate does not befall the new managerial team.
What exactly is Damiel Comolli's role at Spurs? He says nothing, but he is often cited as the man whose influence over Daniel Levy is the root cause of many the the negative issues.
Who exactly was responsible for the purchase of Darren Bent? If it was Martin Jol who wanted the player, he seemed very reluctant to play him, and I cannot think of a Spurs fan who saw the sense in such a huge transfer fee when it was evident to all and sundry that there were areas where the money should have been better spent.
I would like to point out that I'm not being wise after the event, I am merely a working guy who played Sunday football at a very average level. Like most fans, even I could foresee the troubles ahead because whoever purchased Bent hasn't a scooby doo about football, and is in a position at White Hart Lane that has too much influence over the board and chairman.
Was the purchase of Kevin-Prince Boeteng or Younes Kaboul at the price paid good business? I can think of a dozen players in the Championship who can run around like a headless chicken or warm the bench, along with all our other young stars of the future.
If it was Comolli, then the problem at Spurs still exists. How on earth can a tradesman be expected to work with another man's tools? Jol was expected to. You can cite his lack of tactical nous, and I would agree with you, but you would then have to accept that his tactics got us the leads in the first place, so it rubs both ways.
But it's the internal politics that have ripped the club apart, more than results on the field. It wouldn't surprise me if the meeting in August was deliberately leaked as an attempt to make Jol resign in indignation, something which became inevitable. But perhaps they never considered that Jol would hold out for a king's ransom for as long as he did.
Levy has cleared out almost all of the back-room staff. Hans Segers and Chris Hughton were as much responsible for Tottenham's poor tactics as Jol. Will Levy find out who is leaking these stories to the gutter press? Will he explain to the fans Comolli's role? Will Juande Ramos be a manager who picks the players he wants and buys the players he needs?
I have always been an admirer of Levy, and strongly believe that his heart and ambition are both beneficial for the well-being of Spurs. But he seems to be surrounded by too many 'wide boys' who each have their own vision and opinion on the club's future, making life virtually impossible for any new manager.
There has never been a director of football at Manchester United or Arsenal (despite Comolli's claims). Both teams have personalities who are responsible for team affairs from youth level to first team, from tea lady to number two. They appoint whom they want and suffer the consequences of their individual actions if things go wrong and get the plaudits if its goes well.
But I am still none the wiser if Jol is solely responsible for the club's present position. If Levy needs a blueprint for success, then look above us in the table. There are plenty of teams out there with good management, and boards of directors who keep their opinions to themselves.
Comments (18)
by Kenny Johnson on October 28, 2007
I've read up quite abit about Ramos, and what does come through as clear as day is the fact that he does'nt take any shit, and will play his chosen strongest 11.This is something we need at Spurs and every player immaterial of who he thinks he is, should fight to be on that teamsheet.Ramos will make his intention clear from the outset,prima donna's will not last here.And if any player should question that then they will be shown the door.This will be a teething period at the Lane,giving the Coach on oppportunity to look at our lads and access. I do question Commolli's role in all this.It seems that rather than making MJ aware of young talent out there,he was sanctioning the moves himself.Now this could be worrying and instantly compromise the new Coach's position.Let's get a few things back at the Lane that's been abscent for years...Stability,Role, loyalty and commitment..COYS
by Just another depressed fan on October 28, 2007
Ramos isn't the answer. But I don't think that there can ever be an answer whilst Comolli is still around. Is everyone sure that he's not still being paid by the Woolwich Wanderers?
by Mike C on October 28, 2007
Jol has gone, nice guy but not top drawer. Will the board explain to us fans how the transfer buys are made. I can't help but think one element has been missing from previous posts. Namely that Spurs think they can pruchase players like a commodity and look to make a profit on buy-to-sell basis.
by Tommy Harmer on October 28, 2007
Surely the central issue in this debate about Spurs situation has to be the extent of Jol's powers ..... IF Jol was simply handed players with no say, then he was playing with one hand tied behind his back. He should have refused to accept this situation; he didn't because he was at the beginning of his career as an international class manager and so unable to command approaches from other clubs as he does now. He had no bargaining power and could be viewed as a nice guy prepared to be a good coach. I think, however, that the position was more likely to have been presented to Jol as one of dialogue between him and Comoli regarding transfers .... but the quality of that dialogue would have to depend upon the relative power of the relationship of each with the board, and the influence that this brought each of them. I suspect that Jol was a little too straightforward and honest for Levy - not enough of a respectful servant when something important needed to be said - and that Comoli is more of the 'insinuat
by Surreyspurs on October 28, 2007
The transfer policy of the club has been poor for years and the acquisitions this summer terrible. Bent is a good player but never worth the £16m or whatever. It is clear (and didn't Jol think this?) that a defensive midfielder to win the ball and not constantly give it away like Jenas and Zokora (how often did Pedro Mendes lose posession?) is needed, but what what did we get? If Ramos doesn't get control of the buying policy and get his hands on a decent central midfielder and a centre back that doesn't panic then the team will leak goals all season and we'll be lucky to finish in the top half of the league. Pray that Ledley can get and stay fit and that we offload 4 - 6 players in January and replace them with 2 or 3 that aren't just "ones for the future".
by another sad fan on October 28, 2007
Don´t take me wrong. we have alot of quality in the squad. but the board has wrecked our beloved club. Everything has been positive for the last two years, with finishing 5th, and bein able to push the top 4 to the limit for the champions league places. and when we were waitin for this season it was with a great deal of optimisme, that the club was a real competitor to break into the top 4 and become a force in the premier league. but just as the season started, the board started to mess things up. first with the ridiculus buy of darren bent, which was doomed to give us problems...i just can´t see the point, we were rounded over 100 goals last year with berbatov,keane and defoe as the attackin power, and everyone fan in the world could see that the only thing that was missing was a more compact defence as we have been letting goals in like a relegation candidate. But the worst thing for me is that the board has lost the soul of football, with their "illegal" approach for ramos and poyet. those are t
by a little bit more optimistic fan on October 28, 2007
I just wanted to point out a few things after reading these comments. First, to 'another sad fan' your heading stated 'worst Spurs ever seen' are you having a laugh. How long have you been a fan, because I have seen the club a lot poorer than this on and off the pitch. Remember the Sugar days - so he got us to a financially sound footing but this is the guy who turned down Bergkamp - yep Bergkamp. Why?? Because Klinsmann only stayed one season and so he wasn't going to waste his money on anymore 'Johnny Foreigners'. That was a good move its taken us 10 years to slowly catch up. I can even remember before then when Scholar nearly financially ruined our club so don't tell me about this board I actually (up until the Jol affair) think they have done brilliant for Spurs. How many clubs can boast a profit like ours and still spend the money we do on transfers (Arsenal can't)!! And as for the Darren Bent situation - again short memories I think. Wasn't it Jol who stated last season that he wanted Ben
by big cheese on October 28, 2007
its so obvious we lose so many games in the last minutes of agame ,were so unfit ,ramos has bought over his fitness coach 2 get these lazy s***s working.really starting to get scared now, losing 2 many games ,jesus i hope ramos sorts it soon .
by Steve Wilkins on October 29, 2007
Why were MJ T shirts on sale for 1/2 price at 5.00 pm on Thursday in the shop - and why isn't he on the Monopoly game ? If Darren Bent was the answer, what on earth was the question ? Ditto, Tarabt, Dervitte, KPB, Kaboul. What does Didier Zokora put on his passport where it says Occupation ?
by daniel on October 29, 2007
You say Arsenal and Man Utd have never had a Director of Football, but Sevilla; Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, Ajax, PSV, Milan, Juventus all have one and they haven't done too badly trophy-wise have they? Whether Comolli is the right man for the jo I cannot say, but there are many examples of the system working really well. Its just that every time something goes wrong at Spurs the media like to blame the two tier management system because it something alien and "foreign" to them.
by yodel on October 29, 2007
hang on hang on... whoever said the transfers this summer were poor needs to think before speaking. yes bent has underperformed but he has done well in the past and is just lacking belief right now. he'll come good. next up we have kaboul, a player who has been thrown in the deep end at a very young age, young centre halves always make mistakes so again, give him time, he'll be worth every penny once he gets ssome experience. bale... come on, what an excellent signing, pure class.... and boateng is rated very highly in germany and has just been unfortunate with injuries so far. looked good when i watch reserve match highlights and could well be the midfield wizard we need. now ramos and his tough no crap attitude are at the lane, players like jenas, robbo and berba will be put in their place. a couple of ramos signings in january and we'll be right. i loved jol but this had to happen, look where we are in the table, we need this change with the talented squad we have
by jordan on October 29, 2007
I cant be bothered any more, we have had SOOO many managers and each time one comes in, spurs fans (mself included) rant and rave about how this one has x and y qualities we need. 1 - 3 years down the line, we have completely rubbished them and find someone else who has P and Q qualities that we now need for domination. Same shit, spurs have a deep problem within the board, the coaching staff and the players
by Croc on October 29, 2007
What? I read through the thread with a sense of bewilderment. The current team is perhaps the BEST that we have had for 30 years (when dod we last finish in the top 5 in two seasons running - anyone?). Please please don't given me the rose tinted Gazza days or even worse the Hoddle days. A few cosmic sparks in an otherwise sea of mire. We have a few key (and presently) fatal weaknesses but with good coaching and more cautious tactics we can start to punch our weight. We have a decent keeper whose confidence is shot and who needs a long rest or a new club. We lack a leader in the middle and someone who can defend and command - Robbie Savage would improve our team no end - let alone Lampard.....and we lack a real creative force in the middle. Three players and some tactical nouse. I am a big Jol fan but we were (are) in freefall and in such situations a change is sadly the only option. Don't blame Levy for the change - sure do blame him for the way that the departure of Jol has been handled , but not for the d
by yiddodel on October 29, 2007
croc - i was in yer corner till you mentioned savage!! you are a mug mate, everything else you said was good but if u think a player like savage could appear at the lane (other than a part of the toilet cleaning staff) you don't avva clue - or maybe you are welsh. either way mate, gettit together, we are looking for a replacement for zoko and jenas not a neanderthal to drag our evolution backwards. what makes me laff is u then go on to mention lampard in almost the same sentence as savage...... everything you said made sense, yes to lamps, savage, would u fcuk off
by Graham Duncan on October 30, 2007
According to minutes of the Spurs Trust, Daniel Levy stated that Martin Jol had the final say in the selection of players contrary to what has been reported in the Press. Before criticising Spurs Board fans should not forget that the Club has 'dug deep' to fund the purchase of players and 'invested' far more than previous Boards. Hopefully Jenas/ Zokora/Lee will be exported elsewhere and Huddlestone rested until he learns how to pass the ball and defend with the zeal I have only ever seen from him in the Arsenal game. I don't know what has gone wrong with Dawson this season but with Rocha and Gardner injured and Dervitte not fit or tested in the Premiership, we have to get another Central Defender. After all Kaboul has not exactly shone other than in going forward. Will we ever see King play regularly again? Midfield needs both a good stopper who can hopefully pass the ball as well and someone with some creativity!
by Lloyd Stiles on October 30, 2007
You know what...Bent didn't cost 16.5 million. He cost 5.5 million a year over 3 years. And that's a big difference. If we stay in the Premiership for those 3 years, our prize money alone will pay for him. If, as appears more than likely, Berbatov goes either in January or next summer, then we'll need another striker. THFC bought Bent because they knew the Berbatov situation would probably occur. And Bent had been the highest English goalscorer in the Premiership the previous two seasons. To me, it was a good deal. However, it was Jol's job to pick a team for each game. Berbatov goes AWOL away from the Lane, so Jol should have played Bent. He chose not to, and lost his job accordingly. He also always played Jenas when fit. He had to go. I don't like Comolli but I agree with the system. We're not going to qualify for Europe through the League but there are still other trophies to win and frankly, Ramos is more likely to change things than Jol was ever likely to. COYS !!!
by Pete L-McCarthy on October 30, 2007
Wholeheartedly agree with your post,but 16.5 million is 16.5 million however its paid, and frankly Van Der Vaart or Sniejer (prior to his transfer), would have been better spent. It the ambiguity of the role that I find confusing,I thought it worked well when Arnesen was the overall man in charge, as it least there was clarity. Hopefully that will now happen and we can go forward...quickly
by Skip Wright on October 30, 2007
Wow this is really causing one pain.I could always say to work-mates who seem to support M.U or Arsenal or Chelsea and of course Liverpool.. "here we come beware Guys"but I am having to take some serious Flak..! I am sure someone will Remind me that my brain is losing IT!.....but Some how I feel that ever since that disgusting way of bringing Hoddle to the Lane! ...Lady Luck has been smiling some where else!! PLEASE Mr New Coach lets get going and tell some of our players that when they get the ball they don't have to give it to the opposion every Time. That hole in the middle of our defensive curtain opens wider than the the Nile did. Skip, Cape Town. ps where the Springboks come from LOl!! Heh! Heh!!
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Lions 'King' on the prowl ahead of Super 14 clash with Stormers
Stormers warning ahead of their Super 14 opener with the Lions
Australia's Boxing Kangaroo flies proudly - no thanks to the IOC
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.