Home > Cricket > Indian cricket will get nowhere under a local coach - the answer's a wizard from Oz
by Partha Rajagopal on 15 November 2007
Email this Article (6) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
The ugly incident when Greg Chappell was attacked while he was India's cricket coach is exposing the reality in India as well as the entire sub-continent, where managing is extremely difficult. There are too many opinions and demands from all quarters. The media adds fuel to the fire. No-one is allowed to do his job.
Indian coaches lack the professional experience of foreign coaches who come from systems with vastly advanced infrastructures. They have better strategies and have played with teams that have won international games more frequently. I cannot imagine someone like Sunil Gavaskar being a coach. He was inadequate even as a captain.
The only option left is to bring coaches from countries like Australia, South Africa or England who come from a different background and have experience of different systems that pave the way for long-term improvement in performance. They will not favour players nor have any influence from regional politics.
Chappell failed in his mission because he was ahead of his time. In the long run, players should be picked on the strength of reliability and performance. Our players, being used to hero worship were above criticism. They started complaining only when the team got booted out of the World Cup.
After the Chappell incident, most foreign coaches will think twice before taking on a coaching assignment in the sub-continent. One cannot meet everyone's demands. The Indian selectors themselves are constantly bullied which makes it difficult for them to do their jobs. And because of this pressure, they buckle under the pressure.
I don't know how the ICL/IPL rift will pan out. Security for foreign players is going to be a big issue. Players like Andrew Symonds will be targeted and possibly even attacked.
Chappell's vision was good. He wanted to change things so that in the long term the Indian team would benefit. One cannot expect 100 per cent improvement as soon as being given the assignment. Chappell was up front and honest. And he paid the price for it.
Sourav Ganguly was going the wrong way when Chappell took over. He was becoming the tyrant who takes things for granted. He wanted others to perform for him while he led the side. Chappell sent him packing and Ganguly went back to basics, and the results are there now for all to see. Compare this way of working to the Gavaskar, which was all about favouritism and unimaginative leadership.
Chappell's revelation is going to set things back for the Indian team. They will now have to rely on a local coach who will probably play the political cards to stay in his job and compromise on performance. If Indian cricket has to catch up to the Australian level, then we need ex-players from own under coaching at all levels, the national team, cricket academies, state cricket teams and talent spotting. It could take a couple of decades to get there but in the long run it will get the Indian team up to a high standard.
Comments (6)
by Budhaditya Roy on November 15, 2007
Respect your opinion, but I have to beg to differ on Chappell. 1) Chappell was a pathetic coach. His stint as coach in Australia, for a local team (maybe NSW) was disastrous. 2) He was given a free hand. When all his experimented players failed and India kept losing, did the players like SG, ZK, Harbhajan come in. 3) He was the one leaking stuff. Can anybody forget the SMS he sent to Rajan Bala after the team was selected? He had no job to do it. 4) Had Chappell been that good a coach he would have been employed by some other country for national duty, or at least approached. That was not teh case. 5)If he was so victimised, why has he landed himself another job in India?
by sendhil on November 16, 2007
Mr. partha rajagopal, You are wrong that India can't go no where with local coach. In fact, we are here from the world cup debacle without a fulltime coach. So called Foreign coach undermined our players. Of course, Indian dressing room is full of politics. And Chappell do try to have his own followers which is not good for the game.
by rohit sakunia on November 17, 2007
i completely agree by the questions raised by budhaditya and pity ur hangover mr.partha. if am not wrong most of the successful coaches have not been cricketers, the example of buchanon is gud enough so u cant compare on that front. chappell was a pathetic man manager and that was quite clear with his experiments on a daily basis. he tried to destroy a team so well built by a captain who played cricket with utmost passion. he was close to destroyin, harbhajan, irfan and viru and look at the kind of effort being put by all the three to come back in the groove and as far as decency and morality is concerned my dear friend showing the middle finger to the nation is no moral antic i suppose. fortunately or unfortunately athithi devo bhav is still a custom prevalent here so we still respect ppl who try to play with us. shed such inhibitions mr.rajagopal. as far as chappels long term plans are concerned i'll defiantely debate on that subject some time later.i would have loved to do it now but since my exams are ro
by Partha Rajagopal on November 18, 2007
No player enters a team to destroy it. No coach takes up an assignment to destroy the team. If India had done decently in the WC2007, the heat will not be this intense on Mr. Chappell. Somehow things did not click. Greg Chappell tried his experiments too early and too fast. One can definitely criticize his approach. But to make a monster out of him seems unreasonable. We are ignoring our own villains in the BCCI who do not move a little finger for any improvement.
by Brad on November 23, 2007
It would be a hard job to coach India all the talent in the world both with bat and ball but rarely do they perform consistently
by Shiv on November 26, 2007
What will you not do to win? Nothing- not even underarm bowling. Before Chappell landed in India, he gave a statement saying Sehwag is his captain. Who made him the chief selector? After dropping Ganguly repeatedly even though he was performing, he takes credit for Ganguly's comeback form. Greg Chappell doesn't have any values. He's just amercenary. So it is possible he secretly didn't wish India so well. India is a democratic country with cricket as a binding factor. How can we allow people like Chappell to destroy a national team.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Best team on the planet - but without the World Cup the All Blacks can't be GREAT
More teeny toppers join the march of Britain's new generation of tennis stars
New Zealand's cricketers no match for Australia - but can South Africa topple the world's best?
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.