Home > Cricket > Can Australia's domination be replaced for the good of cricket ?
Can Australia's domination be replaced for the good of cricket ?
India's defeat of the Aussies in the CB tri-series could mark the beginning of a new order in cricket's hirearchy. The South Africans are ready to take the baton on and spread the spoils of the game more equally than the Australians.
by Greg Smith on 04 March 2008
Email this Article (9) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
In a new world order of cricket, will those replacing Australia do a better job ?
Cricket lovers have greeted the prospect of the end of Australian domination with mixed feelings. Some see the exit of the Australians as an absolute and others believe they might still stick around in the top three for a bit, even without their retired stars.
The question now, in the face of a waning Australian side, is whether the contenders can do a better job on the international stage than Ricky Ponting and his men did.
South Africa, with Graeme Smith at the helm, stand perpendicular to Australia in style. As the mostly likely incumbents to reign for the next decade, their brand of cricket will dominate. Those that have been caught up in the Australians' cheap-thrills style of cricketing marketing will certainly be concerned. However, the sport of cricket will bloom like never before under the rule of the development-orientated South Africans.
Cricket, traditionally an elite sport, needs a new era of development to save it from its current malaise. The Proteas offer the best hope of bringing the sport to a billion people in Africa while removing it from the British Empire and its colonies, most notably Australia (a nation with strong British sentiments).
South Africa, dubbed the Rainbow Nation, acts as an intermediary between many different cultures and this is what they can offer cricket as the number one nation.
Connecting the dots through the East and West via South Africa, the Proteas offer hope for the sport of cricket, which desperately needs to spread its wings across more of Africa and into new regions like South America and China.
The western media hype of the Australians has had its run; the next evolution of the game will see South Africa take the sport into the stratosphere, boldly going where no-one has gone before!
Comments (9)
by Partha Rajagopal on March 04, 2008
Australians have been rattled, but not dethroned. CA has a strong foundation laid out that always produces, on an average, good quality players. Where did McGrath, Lee, Ponting, Gilchrist, Hayden, Langer and Warne emerge from? Australia still has top players, some of whom might be out of form. Teams go through lean patches sometimes. And rebuilding takes time. India was booted out of the WC2007 and see how they have regrouped themselves. Do not write the Aussies off. Their cricket will not go the Windies way. I only welcome SA to the elite club of cricketing nations which will sustain the high standard of the game. But in the future, no country might be able to do what Clive Lloyd or Steve Waugh/Ponting did that frequently.
by Dave's Mate on March 05, 2008
ohh gee, shucks, golly gosh....what a lovely sentiment. And the world shall rejoice and regale in the wonerous accomplishments of the almighty South Africans. well perhaps.....that is until they choke when the pressure is applied.......AGAIN
on March 05, 2008 on March 05, 2008
cricket is not an elite sport as this article shows http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0 ,22049,23322262-5001031,00.html
by Brad on March 05, 2008
south africa will take over as the number 1 ranked one day team when they beat the mighty Bangladesh which is a bit of a laugh where were sa in the 2 last world cups the true test of champion teams? i must admit they have improved but i dont think there about to dominate for 10 years like aussie i believe they will be back down the rankings soon enough they dont have enough class players to consistently beat everyone!
by Partha Rajagopal on March 05, 2008
Ranking should carry a weighted average to go with it, depending upon the standard of the teams that play against each other. A win against Australia is not the same as a win against Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. The only true test will come when countries play in a tournament like the world cup where they have to deliver. Until 2011, Aussies are still the world champs. If any team beats Australia on their home ground, then they get the second spot. We'll change the rankings after the world cup.
by Greg Smith on March 05, 2008
Partha, this is as bright as your idea to drop Bangladesh (and other minnows) out of international cricket. We're trying to develop the international game, not kill it ! South Africa didn't become Number 1 merely by beating Bangladesh, don't be silly, we've been consistent and have beaten everyone around to get close, the points tally from Bangladesh just confirms our status... I know you feel on top of the world Partha, but you're not... the Proteas are... and we deserve it ! Duckworth Lewis jinxed World Cups and all the controversy in between, South Africa have worked harder than everyone to get to here... its OURS... we'll enjoy it......In the words of Gohlm (Lord of the Rings) MY PRECIOUS !!!!!
by Partha Rajagopal on March 06, 2008
What matters in reality is the ultimate win, which is in a world championship where all teams play. Australia did it three times in a row, while the team changed from one generation to another. They lost one game in all three tournaments put together. Do not write of Ponting and co. They will be back and they always deliver where it matters the most. True champions are those who are consistent. India and SA have to achieve that consistency. India was in the finals in 2003 and then disappeared in 2007. India at least won some tournaments. Let us see if SA can do that.
by Brad on March 06, 2008
HAHAHAHA you really try to make everyone feel sorry for south africa because there to stupid they are useless they havent beaten aussie in a test series for as long as i can remember and as for duckworth lewis being a jinx why dont you realise south africa are shithouse under pressure they will never be the best as they need to win consistently for 10 years hahaha are they going to do that hmmmmm no they are no chance you ugly fool get a life dumbsh*t you have no clue about cricket seriously if i was you id probably go jump of a bridge or since your in africa just take a walk down the street and get shot. unlucky feral
by Ashish on March 24, 2008
I think greg is right to some extent in SA as a hardworking team yet i believe Aussies are still the best... SA have had so many chances to prove their metal but they couldn't do it...WC jinx, poor cricket or whatever might be the reason behind it. I sereously believe India are a fast improving cricket nation and might turn out to be too good for SA in the upcoming domestic series....
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Revealed: The qualities Spurs and Ramos must find to escape the relegation mire
Spin wizard Mendis heading from Sri Lanka to English cricket - what a Splendid idea!
Juventus, Milan and Co. pull back from brink of Italian Premier League breakaway
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News,