Home > Cricket > India's ODI obsession suggests South Africa will be too big a Test
India's ODI obsession suggests South Africa will be too big a Test
The Proteas have had a good run in the five-day version of the game and are keen to make 2008 a year to remember. Does that mean Graeme Smith's boys will take their foot off the one-day pedal?
by Greg Smith on 06 March 2008
Email this Article (16) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Cricket South Africa is faced with the challenge of a resurgent India after their Aussie ODI success. But could this be turned to their advantage?
The Proteas have made a a good start to 2008. They have strung together four Test series wins in a row and this might be the jewel that lures the South Africans away from India's strength in the ODI arena.
Questions are currently being asked about the strategy for this tour. The Proteas traditionally perform well in India but might they opt to 'throw' the ODIs and focus on the Tests?
India, it seems, are comfortable with this trade-off and if you told the BCCI that we'll gift them the ODIs in exchange for the Tests right now, I think they'd take the offer and run.
This is to do with the value the Indians seem to place on the shorter version of the game. Their success in the CB Series is being trumpeted as a Test series win - and judging by the back-patting, the Indians believe they are the greatest cricketing nation on the planet because of it.
Unfortunately, this isn't entirely true, or even close. The Indians are a struggling Test team and after the loss in the first Test in Australia, looked likely to fall apart.
South Africa, on the other hand, have been in fine nick in the Test arena. They have worked at playing Tests like no other team in world cricket, and have experimented with various options while keeping a winning momentum.
I think South Africa will focus on the Tests and aim to make it five series wins in a row. It is also going to be very interesting to see how South African Gary Kirsten, the new India coach, will prepare for the Tests.
Will his 'inside' intimate knowledge of South African strategy prove valuable or will it turn out to be outdated and backfire?
The Proteas, faced with the knowledge that Kirsten in now part of the opposing camp, may perform brilliantly and deliver the possibility of a 'new look' Test approach.
Graeme Smith and Neil McKenzie have hinted that this might entail a lot more aggression and a Test run rate of five or six an over from the start.
South Africa have also kept their bowling attack under wraps. Will Paul Harris and Johan Botha operate as a spin duo? Will Harris and Robin Peterson operate at one end with the pace and swing attack at the other end? Will Andre Nel get under the skin of the Indians and open cracks for Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel and Makhaya Ntini?
And with Jacques Kallis getting a recent five-for, everyone is asking will he swing it like that again?
I'd like to say South Africa have the strength and depth to win the Tests and ODIs comfortably, but in the modern game, form in one format or the other is the trend.
For the purist, the prospect of South Africa winning the Test series is sufficient and 'on paper' seems likely.
Comments (16)
by Anantha S on March 06, 2008
Indians may be crazy about ODI's. However the major achievement is giving run for money for Aussies in the Tests. Winning in the hostile perth pitch is considered as a major achievement during the return of seniors (Rahul, Ganguly, Anil Kumble) to the indian soil. Having said that, India has also given a run for Aussies in the Test series during their last visit and not in ODIs. So having won the ODI series also adds as a feather in cap for the indians this time and hence got all the media attention. So let's us put things in perspective.
by Chandra on March 06, 2008
Are you saffers dreaming or what? You managed to beat us at home (S Africa) by a whisker. I see a tough series with 4-5 players making a big difference a. How do Indians handle Steyn/Peterson and harris? b. How do Saffers handle the Indian spin crowd as well as the pace attack of RP/Sree and Ishant c. How do Indians deal with Smith, Kallis and Prince? Whoever wins the majority of these battles will win the series. Now to some of your other comments which are largely untrue. a. One of the biggest myths floating around the planet is that Indians donot watch Test cricket. All recent test series in India have seen crowds that vary between 50-90% of stadiums. The average Indian stadium has a min capacity of 50000 and a max of 100000 b. Indian TV viewership of the Aussie test matches was massive. It has always been high on saturdays and sundays and when matches are interesting. c. The Indian ODI and Test sides that played Australia are quite different. For example the Test side will have players like Sehwag, Kumble, Ganguly, Dravid, Laxman and RP Singh, none of whom played the ODI series in Australia (Sehwag played a couple of early matches). Essentially, 6/11 of the team are fresh and all set to take on the Proteas at home. Include Zaheer Khan and that would be 7/11. On the other hand the Saffers have been playing so much cricket that they had to provide a break to some of their key players d. I dont know when you last checked the Test rankings but India is ranked second after test series wins against Eng, Pak and a close one against Australia. SAF on the other hand beat 6th ranked Pak,7th ranked NZ and 10th ranked Zim. Now that is not a roll as far as I am concerned. e. GK as a coach or not is no more a big factor. The team has done well without a coach and if at all he would be a positive f. The whole thing of Nel getting under Indian skins is actually funny. After the pumelling he received in SAF and the Indians fresh from a mighty battle with the mighty aussies the Saffers are better off focussing on cricket rather than wasting time sledging et al. Overall, i would say the edge is with the Indians. The SAFFERs are a good team and we welcome a brutual contest with them. May the best team win. As far as your analysis goes, keep dreaming :-)
by Greg Smith on March 06, 2008
...you say ? Well we've come back to snatch another 'whisker'... unless you say...'not by the hair of my chinny, chin, chin !'
I come for a long family line that can see into the future... this is what's going to happen in India... 'Nel is going to be used to provoke the Indians. When they lose their rag, South African is going to play the RACE CARD to rub salt into the recent Aussie debacle, and with the cat amongst the pidgeon, as cleverly done in Oz, the Protea's will be off with it's whisker (and the silverware)...thank you very much, we loved the curry !
by Kapil Dev on March 06, 2008
South Africa beat the mighty bangladesh but India lost 2-1 to minnows Australia that too in their backyard. Obviously Bangladesh has the biggest advantage considering Saffers are the best players of spin bowling in the world and saffers posssess the best one-dimensional attack in the history of cricket, i think they will walk in as favorites.
by Ankur M on March 06, 2008
India is World no 2 in Tests and been in top 3 for most part of last 4 years. Really, India are a struggling Test side?
by Partha Rajagopal on March 06, 2008
Playing against a good team and counter punching them does two things - it gets your game to a higher level and gives you a lot of confidence. The Indian team (both the test and one day teams) has that experience. SA was skittled out for 84 in their home series against India before coming back in the series. Unfortunately India was in a situation similar to the Aussies then - rattled by WC2007 exit, hostility at home, self doubt and several key players going out of form. But they recovered by beating England in England, beating Pakistan at home and then standing up to the Aussies on their home grounds that no other team had done. Win at Perth was a dream win. And that has boosted the morale and confidence of the team. SA played a mediocre Pakistan, mediocre WI and now world champions BD. They definitely have star players, no doubt. But they are not going to be able to run over the Indian team. I'd say the teams are evenly matched and India has the home advantage.
Greg obviously smokes something that we don't. Read this one !!! he is truly hillarious http://www.sportingo.com/cricket/a7022_s econds-south-africas-reserves-can
I will come back to post here after the 3 test series...
by Ass whoopers of the Proteas on March 07, 2008
Greg Smith - You barely beat us in South Africa.(and we have another 11 good players to choose from now!) And when was the last time you were competitive playing against Australia. We beat Australia in Australia and would have drawn the test series had it not been for some bad umpiring. You can meanwhile feel happy after beating Bangladesh. We will whoop you so hard that you will scream in agony. We will do to Nel what we did to Symonds and Hayden. Look at where they are. I will be back after the tests ... to rub some curry on your face! Have fun till then
by Brad on March 07, 2008
I hope India dont play Sreesanth hes so crap its not funny there have atleast 5 better pace bowlers than him
by Greg Smith on March 07, 2008
... the reality is, I wouldn't have been so BOLD in 2007 or 2006. In 2008 the Proteas are in TOP form ... winning momentum is like an extra 12th man on the field... good luck to India, this is going to be full on WAR ! I'm looking forward to it...
by M K on March 09, 2008
The test series will be won comfortably by India. As far as ODI is concenred, it must be tight, but India has a home advantage.
by Greg Smith on March 09, 2008
Test history will continue in South Africa's favour, 14 -2 is the current ratio... will look like 17-2 in about 40 days and 40 nights ! haa haa... get over it now...
by Paul Harris on March 09, 2008
Hi Follow indian cricket carefully and u notice there may be little up's and downs but loo at the form in the test arena they had won test series in england and except lords they have never look like being challenged and when pakistan toured india not even a session was won by paistan except the one where misbah and akmal showed some brillance and in australia if steve bucnor and mark benson arent there the test would have been a cae walk for indians and rest of the series is one sided as far as i concern so dont get to a conclusion that SA series in india is going to be a cakewalk and dont forget sachin is in gud form and dravid is there as alwways and dont forget shewag he can be destructive and vvs laxam never write him off and sourav raving for the success after an axe from odi side so its difficult to judge a winner but my money will be definetely on India
by A Agarwal on March 18, 2008
Greg, India's ODI boys are proving to be world-class (& a handful for even SA). India's test players are jealous (and who wouldn't be?) of the adulation and money. In place of a WC, they are targetting toppling Australia!! I am hoping SA doesn't want the same thing; inorder to avoid a shed load of tears and broken dreams for one of the teams. Seriously, IMO India's trump weapon will be their bowling attack & their vintage batting will be the support act. A Question for all SA fans is: Do Ishant Sharma, RP Singh, Sreesanth (on a seaming track) SCARE SAfricans MORE than say Kumble, Harbhajan, Chawla (on a big turner)? On a personal note, I will miss this series and focus instead on the IPL, Asia Cup, ICC trophy & Aus Tests. Best of luck to all IPL contracted RSA players - get some useful practice in guys, impress your IPL Icons & Franchisee bosses, and see you very soon.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Best team on the planet - but without the World Cup the All Blacks can't be GREAT