Home > Cricket > How much of a success is the IPL?
How much of a success is the IPL?
Big money and big names have made the new Twenty20 league a hit. But two weeks into the venture the novelty is wearing off, and aside from the money the franchisees and the BCCI are making, is it really making an impact?
by Madhusudan Rao on 03 May 2008
Email this Article (4) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Is IPL the future of cricket? I think we should wait for all the franchisees to update their balance sheets after the current competition is over.
Have they made money? Probably no-one is expected to do so, in the first year. It was suggested by BCCI that the franchisees will recover their money in the first two to three years. Going by the initial enthusiasm, one might think that this might be true. But, this perception has to be revisited during the next two weeks when the novelty of the matches will start fading.
Will the crowds continue to patronise the matches? Probably not. The Bollywood stars and cheerleaders were supposed to supplement the cricketing gods in this concept. Sponsors for shirts, watches and cricket kit have contributed to the coffers of franchise owners. Owners like Bollywood stars Shahrukh Khan and Preity Zinta and the tycoon Mukesh Ambani were at the stadia on match-days to be seen how seriously they are taking the venture.
But really they are only concerned about their business interests and how quickly they can recover their initial investments. But, is it only about money? One of the ideas of IPL was to give the country's young talent a chance to prove themsleves. Bowlers like Manpreet Gony, Pragyan Ojha and Shaun Marsh have displayed promise even for the longer versions of the game. Is the IPL entertaining? The answer to this one is NO. The cricket is mostly one-sided, with batsmen going all out to hit boundaries in the smaller grounds. The bowlers have no room for error and there is a feeling of emptiness.
There is no emotion when Zaheer Khan gets hit for a six or a Rahul Dravid gets out for a duck. Cricket is a game of emotion and without it, the game is neither interesting nor entertaining. It might as well be a match between Zimbabwe and Kenya. A shorter tournament would have been better. The eight teams could have been split into two groups of four and play each other once home and away. The top two teams of the groups would have met in the semi-finals, followed by a best-of-three final. This schedule would have kept the interest going among the fans.
The winner of the inaugural IPL tournament is undoubtedly the BCCI. They have to be credited for pulling off this venture.
And the stakeholders will be laughing all the way to the bank.
Comments (4)
by Its Me World on May 04, 2008
I beg your pardon, a match between Zimbabwe and Kenya would be emotional, interesting, and entertaining especially if the match is not fixed to give countries a chance to win games. Face it, cricket is a sport compromised by the boards who run it! We don't really see the talent of the cricketers because matches are fixed! If they were not fixed countries, such as Zimbabwe and the West Indies would dominate the international cricket league!
by Amit on May 04, 2008
I think the comments made above does not seems to be that of a cricket enthusiast. Probably some crime reporter giving view about technical details which i am sure he is not aware of. To say that IPL is not success is not true. Even i shared the same view before the start of the event. You have watch it before saying anything. I think every game i have seen till now has been fought till the last ball. Games have been thoroughly entertaining. Definitely IPL has benifieted by the inclusions of the foriegn player. It is a really a good oppurtunity for youngsters to learn from the legends of the game. IPL Rocks
by arghwan rabbhi on May 05, 2008
i love cricket as well cricketers and u can see my face with lots of emotion when zaheer gets hit for a six whether he is playing for india or banagalore or even in county sorry to say that these comments made by you are very very conservative towards ipl, possibly ipl is not good for student because they are now envolve more in watching cricket than to books but it is good for cricket...........
by Azam Muhammad on May 15, 2008
I have no idia why media is not supporting the success of IPL. Even a dum person can see how successful this league is. Stadiums are ful, top foreign players are fighting for a place in the team and teams are giving their best to be victorious. Its true that shah rukh khan, priti zinta and people like vijay malya are business men looking to recover their money but looking at their enthusiasm and energy in the ground it would be unjustified saying they are only after money. Sorry mate i dont agree with your conservative thoughts.....IPL is good for cricket, entertainment for families and a great fun.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Best team on the planet - but without the World Cup the All Blacks can't be GREAT
More teeny toppers join the march of Britain's new generation of tennis stars
New Zealand's cricketers no match for Australia - but can South Africa topple the world's best?
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.