Home > Cricket > Second Test: The Strauss waltz was superb but it was Vaughan's leadership that polished off the Kiwis
Second Test: The Strauss waltz was superb but it was Vaughan's leadership that polished off the Kiwis
England's fall and rise in the space of two hours was remarkable, but look closer and you can see the calm authority of the captain steadying a sinking ship. In short, this was a classic Test victory.
by Sahil Dutta on 28 May 2008
Email this Article (11) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Stunning is an overused word in cricket (you can blame Mark Nicholas for that), but England's turnaround against New Zealand in the second Test at Old Trafford was nothing short of stunning.
That they went from woeful to wonderful in the space of a couple of hours should not distract from the deep malaise that has infected this side.
Watching England's green attack being flogged all over Manchester by Ross Taylor was depressing but understandable. Stuart Broad is young, improving and may yet time his maturity perfectly, like Simon Jones did last time.
Jimmy Anderson, however, suffers from a bowling schizophrenia that must drive all of England insane. You sense he shares all our frustrations when the ball disappears down fine leg for four, but like us, he just doesn't know how to make it better. If Andrew Flintoff can return, surely Anderson must give way; if not, then Chris Tremlett deserves a chance.
Yet it's England's middle order that brings back the chill of the '90s. We have all seen the talent but since the Adelaide horror show they have suffered from a collective paralysis. Despite Michael Vaughan’s repeated assurances that England “are ready to express themselves and play the sort of cricket they can”, they don’t.
Cricket is a fantastic sport because it offers a window into people’s minds. Confidence or lack of it is thrillingly visible to opposition and spectators alike. Under pressure Ian Bell camouflages his languid natural gifts with a timid, poky and frankly hopeless alter ego. Like Anderson, he seems on the cusp of breakthrough, but it's been four years and we’re still waiting for the match-turning hundred.
It is only Paul Collingwood’s shoulder that should save him from the selectors' axe. Collingwood is a determined team man, who unlike Bell appears to revel in pressure, but he is so painfully out of form that the selectors should waste no time in sending him to the operating table. Owais Shah’s confidence might be just what this middle order needs to shake into action - that and Kevin Pietersen to stop moaning about his IPL money.
If England are to make the transformation necessary to match the South Africans this summer, they should look no further than their captain.
In the first innings Vaughan, on the back of a century, was strokeless, digging himself and England into a deep hole from which they could see nothing but their own fears. In the second innings, he, like England had reformed and though Andrew Strauss rightly took the plaudits, it was Vaughan’s positive and purposeful outlook that set the tone.
The wicketkeeping position continues to hound England and should Flintoff ever return, the balance of the side will need addressing. Yet fundamentally, it’s the unwavering belief that separates the class of 2005 from this England team.
Comments (11)
by Jim Blue on May 28, 2008
The English middle order problems need addressing badly, Collingwood and Bell are out of form but whilst the latter seems to be getting out the other side of it the former looks like a sunday league batsman. Bopara or Shah for the Duhram man, and soon. As for the bowlers, Simon Jones in for Anderson, or maybe Tremlett. Keeping him in there rather then giving him time to regain form on the county scene will cause long term problems for his bowling. As for the wicket keeping, Read is the only answer at the mo. Wont get tons but will take catches and hold up the other end for the middle order.
by Greg Smith on May 28, 2008
Huh ? I saw two Saffers (Strauss and KP) turn the match on its head ! Whipping Kiwi's is such a delightfully South African thing... well done lads, who need Vaughan ? Maybe England, they deserve him !
Monty Panesar had far more of an impact on the game then the two mentioned above.
by Sahil on May 28, 2008
Clearly the wrong impression had been given. Panesar undoubtedly turned the game on its head, he transformed England's match, but the wider mindset of the batting, which was so dreadful in the first innings, was much better in the second and I think Vaughan's contribution to that on day four, demonstrates how he and England should always approach their batting.
by Mani Thangadurai on May 28, 2008
Ah, Mr. Smith, ironic as it is that in one of your previous articles you said that you were better off without KP and Lord Brocket, you choose to praise them both. Well, they're ours now and I can certainly predict that just as in 2004-05 they'll both have a real impact against their ex-compatriots! And as for Vaughan, he is out and out a far better captain than your beloved namesake Graeme in terms of tactics, class, dignity and ability to really command the respect of his teammates. Smith has certainly improved but is NOT the best in the world and needs to improve by leaps and bounds still. Anyway, back to the article. Jimbo is a really talented swing bowler who is very very good when he gets into his mojo. But like the girl with the curl, he's horrid when things don't seem to go his way. England seem to have a plethora of great swing bowlers, Simon Jones seems to be getting back into form, and Matt Hoggard is also waiting in the wings. If Anderson has to be dropped then instead of Flintoff it should be Hoggard who is brought back into the side. Hoggard has always been a fantastic swing bowler and we all know how Graeme Smith became Hoggy's bunny in the 2004-05 series. The South African skipper so far has had a great time against attacks that have lacked real penetration so far but still in my view has a soft centre and a weakness against quality swing bowling. Surely a great swing bowler can strike fear into him! If the Yorkshireman keeps up his form I think he should come into strong contention for the next series! If Flintoff is to return, it should be for Collingwood who does seem to be affected by his injury. Tim Ambrose seems to be doing ok as a gloveman but I have always had a stronger preference for Chris Read. I'm not too sure that we should have any undue worries about a possible all-rounder given Stuart Broad's exquisite batting talent for a lower-order player (shades of his dad Chris perhaps!), so it might be a toss-up between Flintoff and Shah for a middle-order berth.
by Greg Smith on May 29, 2008
Smith = 27 years old with 58 tests as captain... by 2010 Graeme Smith will be the ONLY captain in HISTORY with 100 tests under his belt... that's a FACT... THE GREATEST !
by Jim Blue on May 29, 2008
Wouldnt that more depend on his win ratio rather then just being appointed young?
... I reckon it's a bit of both ... give the guy credit .. flying a international squad at 20 isn't as easy as when you're 30 or 40 ! His stat's and record will be AWESOME by 2010'ish... in 50 years from now... he'll be a legend !
by Mark T on May 29, 2008
Graham Smith started off as an immature youngster who talked the talk but didn't back it up. But he has grown up and his captaincy and cricket has matured and improved. Not only that, but the players do respect him and he has a good team to lead. I do agree though that a win ratio is what dictates whether he will be remembered as a great captian or not. Age alone does not count.
by Brad on June 03, 2008
England would be shitting themselves with talk of a Shane Warne comeback?
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Best team on the planet - but without the World Cup the All Blacks can't be GREAT
More teeny toppers join the march of Britain's new generation of tennis stars
New Zealand's cricketers no match for Australia - but can South Africa topple the world's best?
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League