Home > Cycling news > Tour de France - Not for these two-wheeled pests
by Craig Hackney on 23 November 2006
Email this Article (22) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Author’s note:Before reading this article please note the following. The first half of the article is dedicated to making fun of cycling attire. I fully understand the reasons for wearing it, but I just think it looks funny, more so when people wear it in non-cycling environments. If you lack the ability to have a bit of a laugh at yourself then skip this part. The second section is my view on road safety. It is written from the point of view of a motorist, but influenced by my own experiences as a cyclist. I am not seriously advocating banning cyclists from the road, but rather making an argument for things that, in my opinion, would make cycling safer and, if implemented, would give me the confidence to take up cycling again. Many people have commented that my view is uninformed and not helpful. I disagree, but nonetheless welcome and respect these opinions, and people’s right to express them, and ask simply that you respect my right to have, and express, a contrarian view. I would, however, request that rather than just delivering abuse, you take the opportunity to join up and put forward your arguments on what cycling needs. I, for one, would be only too pleased to read it and pass comment. This site provides a unique environment for anyone to express their thoughts and opinions on any sport related topic that takes their fancy. That being said, it is not my intention to offend and I certainly do not, in any way, condone or encourage intolerance towards cyclists, quite the contrary. In the interest of balance, I can strongly recommend the Wheels of Justice website (www.woj.com.au) - as recommended to me by cfsmtb.
Bicycles used to be the domain of children, professional athletes and maybe a handful of eccentric adults who wanted to stand out as being different. Not any more. In Australia they’re everywhere, individually or in swarms, and not just restricted to our roads either. Nowhere is safe from them. Once-peaceful forests and bush trails now reverberate with the screams and yells of ‘extreme’ cyclists, only occasionally interrupted with the dull, wet thud that indicates that a big old redgum has given one back for the good guys. The worst offenders are middle-aged men, trying desperately to hang on to their youth. They ride bikes that cost the equivalent of the annual food bill for an African township and travel to and from their preferred cycling tracks in their leased company cars.
Professional cycling, while somewhat tarnished over the last few years, has all of the elements necessary to make it irresistible viewing. It has the drama, emotion and excitement of any high-level sport, often mixed with magnificent scenery and terrifying roads. Amateur cyclists, however, have none of this appeal and certainly none of the positive attributes. They are, in short, really irritating.
Firstly, they are responsible for some heinous crimes against fashion and human dignity. It is difficult to understand why it is no longer acceptable just to jump on a bike without wearing skin tight, gaily-coloured clothing emblazoned with the names of sponsors who are completely unknown in Australia. This is even more difficult to understand when you take into account the average body shape of the middle-aged man. Whatever happened to chucking on the blue singlet, footy shorts and thongs to go for a ride? You can’t even wear normal shoes to ride your treddly any more, they need some weird connection to allow you to become one with your bike.
Here are some handy hints to help prospective cyclists decide whether their planned attire is appropriate. First, stand naked in front of a mirror in good light – if you don’t like the reflection, then chances are that covering it in a thin layer of lycra is not going to improve the outlook for the rest of us. Second, if you passed stage one and whilst still in front of the mirror, put on the lycra. If there are unsightly bulges, if it is possible to tell your religion, or if there are bits hanging over the top, then you need to cover up. There is no doubt that bike pants afford the best possible protection for the inner thighs and other goodies, but they will still work under a pair of modesty protecting shorts. This is why we wear additional clothes over our undies!
Finally, look at the sponsors' names written all over the clothes – if you don’t know what the companies do, or what they sell, don’t advertise for them. If you want to be visible, then Bond's make very affordable yellow t-shirts that are available just about anywhere. The sponsors probably wouldn’t be too thrilled to have their logo plastered all over people as unattractive and inept as many of these riders appear to be, anyway.
Cyclists are also a bloody menace on the road. Most Aussies, if they need to travel more than 500 metres, will jump in the car to do it. There is, however, something about major cycling events like le Tour de France or the Tour Down Under, that brainwashes even the most unfit and unlikely individuals into thinking that they could be the next Lance Armstrong or Miguel Indurain.
Living in the Adelaide hills becomes a nightmare around these times, with hordes of these try-hards, shoehorned into their lycra and looking like a pack of mutant peanut M&Ms, weaving madly all over the road in the lowest possible gear while going up a two percent incline. In their minds, they are no doubt taking on the fabled L’Alpe d’Huez, or Checker Hill for the TDU enthusiasts, but in reality they are only increasing their chances of a stroke or heart attack. They are ill-equipped to take on this sort of challenge and seriously put their lives, and those of other road users, in danger. There is no more terrifying sight than barrelling around a blind corner at 100km/h and being presented with a mob of grunting, weaving, two-wheeled pests spread across the road travelling at 4km/h.
Not that things are much better in the suburbs. Cyclists regularly flout the road rules, again placing themselves and others in danger. The cyclists out there are probably screaming that so do drivers, in fact motorists are probably much worse. While they are almost certainly correct, in a fight between a car and a cyclist, the car will always win, regardless of who is in the right.
It’s easy to have fun with subjects like this, but as the tragedy surrounding the Aussie women’s cycling team reminds us, there is a deadly serious side to this debate. Maybe it’s time to look at banning cyclists from our main roads at the very least. Roads are designed for cars and trucks. Kerbside parking on our main roads further confuses matters. While exceptions can be made for back streets, it is probably safest if arterial roads are left to the things they were designed for. Cyclists will, quite rightly, claim that it is their right to travel on any roads that they choose. That may be so, but the fact remains that it is inherently unsafe.
Governments and councils need to get serious about bike lanes that offer more protection, for everyone, than can be provided by a painted white line. Either that, or they need to put in dedicated bike paths, well separated from the road system. Surely it can’t be too expensive, or too difficult, to put in some form of physical barrier to keep the two parties separate. It should also be possible to put in place road closures, or some form of traffic control, for cyclists who want to take on country roads. A little bit of planning and advanced notice would resolve most of the issues with local residents. There are a number of very simple steps that can be implemented to solve the problems, but until they do, it’s in everyone’s best interest that we keep out of each other's way.
Comments (22)
by Tal Rozow on November 20, 2006
As a mountain biking enthusiast - I had a great time reading through the article, which reminded me quite a lot of the biking scene back home. Biking is pure and addictive fun - if you don't practice it, you just can't understand the whole thing. I agree a 100% on separating bikes from roads (at least the main roads!). The simple speed differential and vulnerability of bikers create a disaster waiting to happen. Fashion? yep...men in tights is a matter of taste, not my cup of tea though.
by Rich Clark on November 20, 2006
"...but the fact remains that it is inherently unsafe. " This statement is not supported by statistics, which show that cyclists who are riding with traffic and obeying traffic laws are less likely to be killed on the roads than drivers are. If the "inherent safety" of road use is the issue, then perhaps it's cars that should be banned.
by Jim Boyer on November 20, 2006
Why do most legitate complaints about cyclists and road sharing issues always veer off into a discussion of cycling attire. This clothing allows riders to ride extreme distances at high speeds in very hot/humid weather and stay dry and cool without rubbing off layers of skin during the repetitive motions pedaling. Even less fit or less aggressive riders derive benefit from the right gear. In other words, these are work clothes...and if you don't understand the work you won't understand the clothing.
by Craig Hackney on November 20, 2006
Jim & Rich , I do indeed understand the reasons behind wearing the gear, I just find it particularly unattractive on some people. As for the word fact, I was using the Bush definition of fact which is anything that fits my argument, regardless of accuracy. My point is that not enough resources are put to making cycling safe. I gave up cycling many years ago after a number of "accidents" and close calls. Everyone makes mistakes, but the consequences of those mistakes when bicycles are involved in a mixed car/bicycle environment are too great. I'm also sure the planet would be greatful if cars were banned! Thanks for taking the time to read the article.
by Scott Keiper on November 21, 2006
Your little brain has been exposed
by Michael Fisher on November 21, 2006
Well, allowing that Craig has obviously never done any significant cycling I'll forgo matching sarcasm for sarcasm and note, for the record, that in addition to being stretchy, cycling shorts - in addition to chaffing preventive padding - have their seams strategically placed to avoid pressure points. And chaffing. Putting on the old "modesty preserving" (modesty? Craig have a problem with skin? Everybody have to be a super model or a body builder to just be comfortable?) shorts with too heavy seams in all the wrong places rather undoes the whole point of the bicycle shorts in the first place. We'll just note in passing that dedicated bicycle lanes kill more cyclists than even bad drivers by themselves. Craig may now go back to stewing in his own ignorant bile.
by jillr on November 21, 2006
Laughed at this -- great stuff
by Surly Dave on November 22, 2006
by John on November 22, 2006
Craig, it sounds like you've got a few problems and they aren't strictly related to cycling. Your level of knowledge on this topic is extremely shallow and again, illustrates the fact you are completely out of your depth when it relates to commenting upon road safety. Check the road stats mate, motorists wipe themselves out with a depressing regularity that is not matched by any other road user group.
by Don on November 22, 2006
You use the death of Amy Gillet as a plank to preach further intolerance of cyclists. You realise of course that spouting trash like this simply encourages weak minded lunatics in heavy metal boxes to care even less when passing cyclists in their never ending rush to the next red light. Disgusting. Perhaps when someone you love takes up cycling, your attitude might change.
by Craig Hackney on November 22, 2006
My point, perhaps poorly made, in this article is that governments, both local and state, do not put sufficient infractructure in place to protect cyclists. I'm not seriously advocating banning cyclists from the roads - rather arguing to protect them. If, however you, the cycling community, think that things are fine as is, then I will apologise. As I said in an earlier response, I gave up cycling because it just wasn't safe anymore this is just my opinion. If there was some way of making it safer then I'd start riding again. In the mean time I'll just choose to stay out of the way.
by more polite now on November 22, 2006
You don't get it. We don't need infrastructure, we need attitude change. The roads are as safe as we all make them.
I honestly hope you get attitude change, but my experience is that road users are getting less tolerant rather than the opposite. I have learned a lesson though, stick to writing about cricket no-one reads that stuff!
by cfsmtb on November 22, 2006
Hi Craig, As for your remark "road users are getting less tolerant rather than the opposite", you'd do well to read the Wheels of Justice site and broaden your knowledge of the subject: www.woj.com.au All road users need more patience and awareness, not more intolerant attitudes.
by OzCableguy on November 22, 2006
When you’re in your car and see a cyclist, rejoice. That’s one less car clogging up the roads. More cyclists = less cars = less gridlock + less pollution (and maybe less of these strange weather patterns). Sadly there is a somewhat tragic transitional period when fat old guys become fit old guys when we do look a bit like "mutant peanut M&Ms" but, by way of explanation, part of maintaining the enthusiasm is being a bit of a gear freak where everything at the local bike shop including the gaudy clothes is a must have. However, the clothes are about far more than looks. They make long distance cycling much more comfortable and anything you can do to reduce drag is definitely worthwhile, especially when you're shaped like a giant peanut M&M. Cycling is the new golf. Get used to it. ;-)
by Lotte on November 22, 2006
There is only one thing more terrifying than barrelling around a blind corner at 100km/h and being presented with a mob of grunting, weaving, two-wheeled pests spread across the road travelling at 4km/h. That is the thought that someone would be stupid enough to travel at 100km/h around a blind corner.
by Paul Sadler on November 22, 2006
"Bicycles used to be the domain of children, professional athletes and maybe a handful of eccentric adults who wanted to stand out as being different." Um...no. Up until the "chopper bike" craze of the 70s which promoted the bike-as-toy concept, bicycles were a common form of transport. They still are in most parts of the world including plenty of prosperous first world countries. Don't for one minute think that the average overweight guy thinks that he looks good in lycra. It makes me look like a hard-boiled egg in a sock, but I'm not actually wearing it for your benefit. As for the notion that it works just as well in a pair of shorts, think again. An extra layer of material and an insulating layer of relatively still air next to your legs is NOT what you need while exerting yourself. And finally there's the idea that cyclists hold up traffic. If you fond that overtaking a cyclist presents a serious challenge then I'd submit that it's time to post the license back to Kelloggs. Next time you're negoti
by Prof Tournesol on November 22, 2006
Oh dear, now it's un-Australian to cycle too. Well lets just stick to crickit and footy and drive our 4WDs shall we. After all we can't participate in a sport unless we have the body of a god can we.
by K.A. Moylan on November 22, 2006
Craig wants country roads closed or subjected to traffic control when a cyclist wants to use them. I don't see that as very practical for any sort of bicycle touring. Does that mean closing the Hume Hwy when a cyclist wants to ride out of Melbourne? Or how about a car, with flashing lights & sign, similar to that required for oversize vehicles?
by Dave on November 22, 2006
Ahhhh craig you dont get it :) Dont yo hate it when people who dont play cricket comment nastily on it. Cricket should be banned on sundays, and cricket grounds turned into parks.. Too many heart attacks playing cricket.. needs to be banned. See? If you rode. And by this I dont mean 5 klicks twice a year. you would be qualified to comment. In the same way that having driven a couple of million klicks I am qualified to comment on people who drive around blind corners at 100 kph. But you probably don;t want to hear that comment.
by john on November 23, 2006
Craig, your writing abilities certainly live up to your name. Rather than just being another Austrailan ranting drunkard, why don't you just get a life?
by MoreBikesPlease on December 02, 2006
Craig, you seem quite accident-prone - you could probably do with some tips. http://www.bikexprt.com/streetsmarts/ And here's some background for you on safety in segregated lanes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bike_path (skip down to "Safety").
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading