I have to admit it - some of Arsenal’s football in the 6-2 drubbing of Blackburn was a joy to watch. Even if those three brilliant late goals did flatter Arsene Wenger’s men somewhat.

But I know I’m not alone in thinking that the spectacle of a team of foreigners in red shirts swanning around the pitch is not a Brit-ty sight. Maybe football is all about winning games these days, but where I grew up it also used to be about supporting your local team. And I cannot see what is local about a squad of foreign players managed by a Frenchman and based at the Emirates Stadium.

Indeed, I know I would find it hard to support an English league team whose only concessions to homegrown talent were the inclusion of London-born defender Justin Hoyte and to throw on teenage buy Theo Walcott two minutes from the end of normal time.

Chelsea are almost as bad - but they do at least bolster their massive foreign contingent with a minority compliment of English regulars like John Terry, Frank Lampard and Ashley Cole.

More on Chelsea at: "Chelsea's young Roman empire: a lesson for English football"

The reality is that probably 85 percent of Arsenal and Chelsea’s first-team regulars identify with English football in only one aspect - it’s what pays their massively over-inflated wages. Yet I never hear a murmur from the fans of either club that the Wengers, Abramovichs and Mourinhos of the Premiership are hijacking the Britishness of the oldest and greatest football league in the world.

It’s not as if it is necessary. Manchester United have proved you can win titles and European crowns with a sizeable compliment of players from the British Isles. Indeed, they fielded seven of them in the 3-0 crushing of Aston Villa that kept them on top of the Premiership - five starters plus subs Wayne Rooney and John O’Shea.

I’m not saying that foreigners should be kicked out of our game. Far from it - they have enriched what was a league where physicality ruled with the sort of skills few Brits possess. But there has to be a limit - and while the subject has not escaped the attention of the authorities, so far absolutely nothing has been done about it.

I would have great difficulty in staying loyal to my team, Cardiff City, if we were suddenly blessed with a billionaire benefactor who sanctioned the importing of a full complement of continental superstars. Okay, we might start winning things - but I feel much more comfortable with the one foreigner we do have - Dutch defender Glenn Loovens - plus unlikely-sounding Brits Riccardo Scimeca and Michael Chopra (born in Leamington Spa and Newcastle respectively, if you don’t believe me).

I’m not saying football should adopt the rules of county cricket, where a maximum of two overseas players are allowed in any side. But teams must have some sort of identity that encourages supporters to look in at the locals.

Liverpool, like United, have probably got it just about right with their policy of bringing on locally recruited talent through their junior academies. As a result, Rafa Benitez’s squad - like Sir Alex Ferguson’s - contains roughly equal numbers of Brits and overseas players. And that can only be good for the game…and for up-and-coming kids with aspirations of reaching the very top in their own country.

Do you think there are too many foreigners in the English game? Or is it OK for Premiership teams to field sides without British players? Sportingo would welcome your comments on this article.