Sports news > Football news > Peter Hill-Wood's toff talking smacks of double-speak
by Mark Rivlin on 21 April 2007
Email this Article (50) Comments
Due to a misunderstanding, this article was published yesterday before the editing process had been completed. The following is the text that should have appeared. We apologise for publishing the unedited version yesterday.
Arsenal chairman Peter Hill-Wood certainly is a man who is not afraid to speak his mind. The problem is, like many of his upper-crust fox-hunting friends, what comes out of his double-barrelled plum face is tosh. In an interview with the BBC website, Hill-Wood hits out at the so-called foreign financial influence on the Premiership, in the light of US billionaire Stan Kroenke's purchase of 9.9 per cent interest in the Gunners.
Hill-Wood said: "Why don't we want the American at our club? Call me old-fashioned, but we don't need his money and we don't want his sort. Our objective is keep Arsenal English, albeit with a lot of foreign players. Americans are buying up chunks of the Premiership football clubs and not because of their love of football but because they see an opportunity to make money. They know absolutely sweet FA about our football and we don't want these type of people involved."The kindest interpretation of his words is that he does not like Americans and Russians getting financially involved in English football. Hill-Wood is the British old-school tie personified. He took the well-trodden route of toffs, Eton College, Coldstream Guards and banking, hardly the kind of background that endears him to the masses who enjoy the people's game of football, but that's another matter.One may also question the double standards in his comments. On the one hand he is against "these type of people" influencing the game in the UK, but on the other, he is delighted to welcome Thierry Henry and Co as acceptable foreign influences. Now what kind of message is coming out of that particular bottle? And it would be interesting to know how Mr Hill-Wood defines 'these kind of people'. Who are they? What are they? Perhaps someone can enlighten me.Interestingly, the three teams above Arsenal in the Premiership this season seem to have done well with the backing of "these kind of people", and it does seem that Arsenal, despite the pretty one-touch, mazy-run football they play, could do with some big financial clout to enable them to compete with the likes of Chelsea and Manchester United in the transfer market. Presumably, with the building of the new stadium, there is not enough cash in the pot at the moment to attract the big-money buys that the three teams above will undoubtedly be going for in the summer.So, Mr Hill-Wood, don't be such a cad and accept the fact that you and 'your type' are a dying breed of dinosaur which is fast becoming extinct. Football is now a multi-national business where nouveau-riche and established billionaires are buying clubs as playthings or investments. I don't particularly like the way that money is ruling the football world and I don't think it is good for the game that clubs are now open to big-money takeovers.
But it seems Hill-Wood is being a tad hypocritical. He has been happy to take the vast sums of money brought in by billionaire Rupert Murdoch's Sky TV and Emirates to build the new stadium. Maybe those companies do not represent the 'type of person' he wants to be involved in football.
Comments (50)
by craig on April 20, 2007
Ithought you were being a bit harsh when you said he does not like jewish, but perhaps you are right now thet you mention the fact that the emirates stadium, after all they are harry from french managers/french fottballers/ african footballers/ and an arab based company backing their stadium, it does make you think if your interperatation is correct.. after all americans do speak our language, and lets face it you would rather have an american owned club with the traditions in tact (ie a great stadium like OT) then foreign players, a stadium with no history backed by foreigners and owned by english,, it does seem as broad as it is long. to me
I was one of the people that worried were 600 million of debt would leave us, but since liverpool has got them selves in to 350 mil of debt and another 285 mil to come with the stadium, finding out the chelsea owes 600 million to russion owner abromavich ,it does seem the way ahead. being an accountant does give you the ability to look through the numbers, and believe it or not weather it is share capital or loan capital as long as it is managed right it does not really matter how the company is financed. the power base does now seem to be leaning toward man u and chelsea, perhaps wit big spending this summer liverpool can close the gap, but arsenal are falling behind and one does wonder, will they be overtaken by clbs that arnt saddled with any debt but have big tv cash bonuses to come, lets face it with out rich backers asenal may find them selves behind totenham and everton next season.....
by James on April 20, 2007
What the hell are you talking about? When he says "these type of people" he's referring to American business, not "jews". Absolutely bizarre. And as for the photo, I'm not even sure that is Hill Wood on the right. But the biggest question of all is, have you got the slightest clue what you're talking about.
by Dick Splash on April 20, 2007
A load of old tosh mate. You're talking through your arse. We don't give a shit what the other 3 win, earn or aspire to. We are AFCUK
by Sue on April 20, 2007
I think you know full well what Peter Hill-Wood meant and have decided to twist his words. He is right in being concerned with Americans coming into the game and leaving on a get even richer scheme.
by woody on April 20, 2007
what a ridiculous article. written by, at best, a malcious idiot, at worst a raging racist
by paul on April 20, 2007
I'm not sure where you are headingon the anti-semitism point as Hill-Wood has closely worked with the jewish Dein and Fitzman for over 20 years. Still, I for one would now welcome a quick takeover by Kroenke in alliance with Dein.
by gooner for life on April 20, 2007
Mr Hill-Wood is dead right. The Arsenal directors have always done what is right for the club and never taken a penny themselves. They got a favourable deal for the £260m loan and don't think for a minute that Kroenke will put in a bean of his money. It will all be borrowed the way that Glazers have done. It is pretty hard to take this article seriously when you can't even get your picture capture right.
by Mike Kenward on April 20, 2007
You've made a few giant leaps there, Mr Rivlin. How do you manage to label a man as anti-semitic (an accusation not to be taken likely)based on a comment about American businessmen? Dein, as i'm aware is Jewish and obviously loves Arsenal. Foreign players at the club probably love it too. Hill-Wood knows this. An American businessman with less link to Arsenal than all of these is logically far less likely to have the same emotional attachment (at present at least) and therefore it is justifiable for Hill-Wood to express a concern that "these sort of people" (i.e. those who might seem to be out to just make a few bucks out of the club, perhaps) are not welcome. And perhaps, because you are not really sure that he is in fact anti-semitic and anti-American, you reference his upper-class background, so as to suggest that stereotypically his "sort of people" are bound to hate Jews and Yanks. Hill-Wood is a silly old duffer who doesn't know much tact, but the Arsenal traditions are as important to him as to
by RickyGee on April 20, 2007
Sorry Mark, I'm not the biggest Hill Wood fan in the world and I'm also a 2nd generation Anglo Indian Brit. However to twist someones word to imply that he is a racist is just wrong. Read it again, all he's saying is that 'WE' as Arsenal fans and local people except the fact that we have foreign players in team...but they are football palyers i.e people who love the game. When he says his sort, whilst they are harsh words, he means people that are only there for the opportunity to make their wallets fatter than they are already and not because they have a love for Man U, Liverpool, Villa et all. Most imporatantly I as an Arsenal supporter would rather come 4th or worse every season then sell out...naming the Grove the Emirates was bad enough.
by spike on April 20, 2007
Edelman, Fisman, Dein - all Jewish names. So I don't think there is any semitism here. "These sort of people" are what he said: people who don't know much about the sport who are not interested in the love of the sport, but in the investment opportunity to make money out if it. The players obviously love the sport and many of them love the club and were fans before they joined - which is why they aren't "those sort of people". no double standards here - just idiotic journalism.
rubbish, u are as daft as the writer
He was harsh, hill woods clearly not a racist...support them in a illegal war, they own 3 big british clubs, f**k it why not become the 53rd state??? We've had one French Manager (likely to be the best thing thats happened to English football in years and possibly the next England Manager)...utd have a scottish (not English) manager...also you french footballers like Saha, Silvestre, Evra etc???? Building a bigger stadium in Scankchester is a bit different to N.London...and as for the language, what a load of crap..how many people in Dubai speak English??? I'll tell ya, most of them.
by devvil on April 20, 2007
you guys are full of sh*te and just muckraking. "these sorts of people" means non-English, non-footy fans who don't want to be involved in the game because they love it, but purely to syphon money out of the club.
by Hollywood on April 20, 2007
How can you make ridiculous comment like this: "The unkindest interpretation is that he does not like Jewish people getting involved. How else could you interpret the words "his sort" and "these type of people"? Danny Fiszman's parents are Belgian Jews that fled the holocaust. David Dein is Jewish. Lady Nina is Indian. Get your facts straight you clown.
by AusGunner on April 20, 2007
Haha anti-semitic? Dein, Edelman, Fiszman are of course good old fashioned Christian names.
by Padre Pio on April 20, 2007
You are the main stink around here and a disgrace. You know all too well that Hill Wood is not anti semetic. His closest allies on the board are Jewish, and the Club accept advertising from Israel. What he means by these people are people he considers get rich quick Americans. Now he might be wrong about that, but Jewishness is not the issue. Get out of the gutter
so you have your facts wrong there as well. all in all a poorly researched article.
by joe on April 20, 2007
Arsenal are xenophobic now as well as anti-British? I'd call that an oxymoron. And racist eh? Silly me, I thought Stan Kroenke was white. Arsenal actually have the most ethnically diverse fanbase in the country, and you could probably say the same about the playing squad. I'm presuming the anti-semitic accusation was supposed to be ironic - half the Arsenal board is Jewish already! And the clubs in north London, probably the most Jewish place in the world after Israel. Nice work stupid