Home > Football > West Ham hint at a wage cap, but will Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs and Manchester United follow suit?
by Mark Apostolou on 21 June 2007
Email this Article (45) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Comments (45)
by The Duke on June 21, 2007
I think your right, things need to change and if West Ham mean what they say, or are reported to have said, then good on them. Up the Hammers
by ginola on June 21, 2007
yeh good on them!!!! NOT! west ham area joke they have neill parker and upsom all on over 50 grand a week and there all average players thats why they are capping because they realised when bent turned them down that their status is not going to get them good players so whats the point of paying the average players they will get stupidly high wages! west ham are a joke and deserved to go down!
by QATL on June 21, 2007
What bull! West ham hint at a wage cap yet would pay bent around 60-70k! Look at Lucas Neil et al! Hypocrites or what!!!
by Richard on June 21, 2007
I agree with youe sentiments. Although think Hammers are aiming high and wont reach that with such a cap. Good article
by Brian on June 21, 2007
17M for Bent is proof that it is out of control.
by Dan telfer on June 21, 2007
I think that you will find that spurs already cap thier wages (45-50K per week), we have to as our stadium capacity is a bit of a joke, Spurs is run as a profitable business. west ham are sensible to put this forward as it is at the end of the day a self protecting sratedgy, imagine if West ham went down with player on 75k a week like bent was supposedly offered?
by Yid Army on June 21, 2007
Tottenham to follow suit? You muppet, spurs already have their own wage structure which means no player at the club in on wages higher than 55k a week. Added spurs in the headline to get more hits! Tosser get your facts straight.
if the lengths of contracts were capped at say, 2 years then clubs wouldn't be able to demand obscene amounts of cash for players that are effectively 'trapped' at the club by their contract. With regret, a perfect example would be that of Yossi Benayoun. He's indicated he would like to move to Liverpool, and so instead of being held to ransom, once the contract had ended he would be free to go. obviously this doesn't help the wages situation, as money-minded players would follow the cash to the big clubs. It's just an idea anyway...!
by Ninja on June 21, 2007
Brilliant article. There are a lot of average players in the premiership (including Bent) on an awful lot of money! I think there is little between Bent & Defoe and certainly wouldn't pay anything over £10m for either. Once Bent puts in his transfer request the price will fall and Spurs will have their 4th striker!
by Harry Barracuda on June 21, 2007
West Ham could still go down!
by Robbo on June 21, 2007
I think the money being thrown around in football is now way out of control...as much as it can be a short career as a footballer getting paid 50 - 70k per week for 3 hours training per day and 90 min game on a weekend is not justified.
To be fair a lot of the problems come from the abramovich/chelsea partnership, the proble is noe europe see that they can take the piss out of prem clubs and they will pay what demanded (or more in chelseas case). West Ham are just as bad, £17 mill offered for Bent???? NOBODY Values him as high as that apart from Charlton,so west ham think since they have the money they will just give asking pric e ans they player will follow? im glad that Bent said no but now Charlton think that since one club met thier valuation the others will too. I fell sorry for bent, he seems to have a good attitude.
by Carlos on June 21, 2007
West Ham are a joke! How on earth can they start to talk about a wage cap when they are more than happy to offer D.Bent 75grand a week. Then they have the likes of Lucas Neil who are just there for the money (why else would he choose W.Ham over Liverpool). Also if you had researched your article you would know that Spurs have a wage cap already! Idiot!
by Jolly Jol on June 21, 2007
Wage caps should definatly be brought in. Players tend to move on to the club who offers the most cash, and any loyalty to a club is out the window. Capping wages would help take this element out of the game and smaller clubs will have a better chance of holding on to there best players - making the league a little less one sided (Top 2/4 every year)
by Toadlad on June 21, 2007
Spurs have a 45k wage cap i think
What makes me laugh is that Bent would rather play in the championship then play for the spammers!!
by ED Chappers on June 21, 2007
I think that some of the comments that have been posted relating to wages Upson, Parker and Neill are on at West Ham is based on speculation created by the literary geniuses at the Sun, Mirror et al. These sums have been rubbished by the Hammers Chairman and as a result I think that their hint at a wage cap looks legitimate and possibly the only option to prevent the meltdown very aptly eluded to in the well-written article above.
Totally agree Jolly Jol
by essex_yid on June 21, 2007
Tottenham are one of the only prem teams to still have a wage cap!!! highest earner ledley king at 55,000 get the facts right before writng articles
So ED Chappers you think that Wet Spam are not paying Lucas Neill stupid wages and that he choose Wet Spam over Liverpool because of the great football they play? The only reason they stayed in the premiership is because the FA bottled it when they should have deducted points over the Tevez affair! Dirty cheatin Spam!
I seem to remember Spurs getting away without a points deduction due to the incident in question having been conducted by the previous board- am I wrong or is that some sort of precedent? Also, unless Im wrong I think West Ham stayed in the Prem cos they won 7 of their last 9 games, correct me if Im wrong?
by Sussex Mick on June 21, 2007
As an Addick Fan even I doubt Charlton will ever get £17m for Bent. He needs credit for turning down the money in preference to playing football! I totally agree with a Wage cap-its all obscene. Clubs should only be able to pay wages at a %proportionate to the clubs gate income. That would encourage developing grounds-no-one would doubt that makes Man Utd top payers etc, albeit their proces are much lower than clubs with smaller grounds. At least that makes some sense- after all, if you sell an item you get paid on how much profit you make and take at the till, if you dont you go bust. I think anything over £10k a week, even for a short career is way too much, but this is not just an English thing, it needs FIFA or at least Uefa to adopt it, otherwise all our palyers will go abroad and our teams will be unable to compete in europe.
by Gary, Chelmsford on June 21, 2007
Quote from Eggert Magnusson on WH Official Site 16/6/07: "....our policy on players wages, set at a ceiling of £55,000 a week. Despite figures being circulated in the game, no player at West Ham United earns more than that at present". So - perhaps Lucas Neill isn't really on £75k or perhaps Bent wasn't offered the same amount. Never mind the facts though, everyone hates WH at the moment because they have an ambitious chairman and plenty of money at last. You know what? - we couldn't give a flying one. Seethe away suckers and watch the rise of the Claret & Blue.
by robbo on June 21, 2007
somehow i doubt that if push comes to shove Eggert Magnusson would stick by his proposed wage-cap. Early this week it was reported that Bent was offered £70k a week so proof in itself that Magnusson doesn't do as he preaches. I propose that a cap on transfer spending per season, of say £50mill, would slow the "Premiership Meltdown" This would help mean fewer tranfers taking place so supporters of a team could support the roughly the same players every season and not practically a whole new squad every couple of years. It would gradually force player prices down too and mean team can't "buy success" in that way that Chelsea have to a large extent. It should also limit the gap between the big four and other premiership clubs as they cant drastically outspend less well-off clubs. Furthermore, the money saved can be used to reduce ticket prices (let's not forget Barcelona fans can get a season ticket for about £100). Unfortunately, such a spending cap would have to be UEFA wide to work effectively, though, w
by Dazza London on June 21, 2007
Spurs have had a "salary cap" of sorts for years. We have a well defined pay structure where the more senior players earn the most and that is understood from before you sign any deal. Anyone signing for West Ham now are going to be after the £75k/wk they're paying Scott "I'll go anywhere if the wages are big enough" Parker which is what Egbert suddenly realised. Look at the "senior" West Ham players there already. I'm sure they're going to be ecstatic that a mid-level new comer is on more than double their wages!!