Home > Football > Foreign investment will hot it up at the top of the Premiership
by Dave Doran on 02 July 2007
Email this Article (15) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
As Manchester City prepare to become the latest club to move into the control of foreign investors (Thaksin Shinawatra's buy-out should be completed any day now), the Premiership is being touted as the latest billionaires' playground and serious doubts are being raised about the future direction of English football.
The City takeover will place almost half of Premiership sides in foreign hands and a number of other clubs, including Arsenal and Blackburn, are provoking interest from overseas. But with a government claiming that football is moving away from its grass roots and fears of a Premiership dominated by a privileged few, is there really any cause for concern? Or is this just another case of media xenophobia?
In the mid-1980s English football was at its lowest ebb. Stadiums were crumbling, supporters were faced with poor facilities, hooliganism was rife, and English football teams were exiled from European competition. The old First Division was a selling league with many top players being lured by the financial attractions offered on the continent. Now, more than 20 years on, things could not be more different.
The Premiership is the world’s richest domestic football competition. Supporters watch games in vastly improved stadia, hooliganism is a rarity, and some of the top players in the game are plying their trade on English soil. And, according to financial experts Deloitte, the latest influx of overseas investment is providing valuable benefits to the English game.
The new breed of investors are successful business men in their own right, bringing with them experience of operating large organisations, a number in the sports industry. So while the media talk of “boom and bust”, financial constraint and appropriate financial management seems to be the new order of the day. Roman Abramovich has put the brakes on the Chelsea spending spree; Tom Hicks and George Gillett are keeping a tight rein on the Anfield purse strings; and apart from Manchester United’s recent £50m outlay, and Darren Bent’s £16m move to Tottenham, the anticipated summer transfer gold rush has yet to materialise.
Accomplished businesses invest where there are opportunities for substantial rewards. In the world of football this means success and the winning of trophies, and this can only be good news for the supporters of the clubs concerned. In the short term there may be little change at the top as the new regimes find their feet, putting their investments on an even keel; long term the picture is very different.
As more large-scale investment continues to be attracted to the Premiership, prepare to see a sustained challenge to the old order with Spurs, Aston Villa, Newcastle United, Portsmouth, West Ham and Manchester City all challenging to break the monopoly of the so-called big four. A competition dominated by one or two clubs is set to become a thing of the past and that can only be positive for the long-term future of the English game. To read more from this author visit www.davedoran.co.uk
Comments (15)
by yidtastic on July 02, 2007
Until Jol is booted out of Tottenham and they stop spending studid amounts of money on the likes of Bent, Spurs will go nowhere!
by john on July 02, 2007
has anyone mentioned that mike ashley isnt foreign check your facts
by Yidtastic on July 02, 2007
Get your own handle & stop nicking mine.
by Nathan on July 02, 2007
What a ridiculous statement. Martin Jol has been a pivotal part of our recent success. Our real problem is holding onto key players, but if we can keep berba its a sign of us becoming more ambitious than previously, and things can only get better. I look forward to a top four finish with arsenal looking fragile...
by stevie zippo - he's a yiddo on July 02, 2007
yidtastic must be a gooner, or an idiot - but wait, they're the same thing
by Shane Robinson on July 02, 2007
Well done John (Toon fan), did Dave actually state the entire league was owned by foreign investors? No, he covered that point so well done for making an idiot of yourself. I can't see how the likes of Spurs, Porsmouth, etc. will break the big four monopoly. Granted they have received foreign investment but correct me if I'm wrong, haven't the big four too? If they stand still then maybe these lesser clubs have a shot but they won't. These four were better than the UEFA cuppers before foreign investment so with money I can see little change. The best players will still want to go to the best clubs or the most prestigious so with the possible exception of Spurs, any other clubs outside the top 4 cannot realistically expect to compete with the likes of ourselves, ManU, Chelsea or Arsenal for top names and therefore will always remain outside the quartet
by Name on July 02, 2007
is a kant..
by Twinks on July 02, 2007
Being a 33 yr old Spurs fan I personally think Jol has tranformed Tottenham. We have a good (not great) team and for the 1st in ages other clubs fans are talking about Spurs becoming a force. Jol has spent wisely with some mistakes but who hasn't. Sir Alex? Benitez? Wenger? The Chosen One? All have made mistakes, I think Bent is expensive bit he will be a good player for us. In Jol we trust.
by Bazmundo on July 02, 2007
Yidtastic... r u really spurs fan? I have never known a buzz like this about Spurs in at least 20 years. We have a huge chance to break into the top four. We have 4 very good strikers at the moment... all thanks to Mr Jol and the board's backing. Who would you have as a manager? Venables, Shreeves, Houston, Ardiles,Francis, Graham, Gross, Pleat, Hoddle? Jol is the best manager we have had in years. Try being a fan and not a critc...
by craig on July 02, 2007
i apreciate that the investment from forigners is good but breaking the top 4 please, cheslea now brandish a 500 million pound team and man u have just spent 50 million to keep up with them you will have to spend at least 50 million and to over take there spending andother 20 million for another good player is required, not a chance maybe take arsneals spot as they are very vunrable at the moment, the board on self destruct and not prepared to talke to someone who owns an 8th of the club, there stars leaving and the manager who has brought them 3 premierships and the fabaled invincibles not renewing there contract, aprat from that i cant see aston villa man city westham and portsmouth say occupying the top four its not going to happen
by klaus on July 02, 2007
the more clubs are being taken over by big moneyconcerns, foreign or not the less it is about break into the top four and more about not slipping into the bottom three...if a club like man city is worth 80 mio quid, plus the 50 or so needed to improve the side, we are talking investment of north of 130 mio...just like westham last year....they came with a whisker of blowing the lot by being relegated, whiche explains their panic buying this year...iam sure big ears from iceland didnt anticipate that possibility...if u get relegated, its all gone...the realisation of that will stop professional cash arriving...thai curry is buying the club purely to make it more diffcult for him to be prosecuted...a tactic which worked for berlusconi and probably roman, but they are a different league... may be alan sugar was rite by comparing it to the dot com bubble
by Anon on July 02, 2007
Nope. The top players are only interested in clubs that are already winning titles/in the CL. It's the football equivalent of "we wont hire you because you have no experience even though the only way to get experience is for us to hire you"
by Essexian76 (not the gay one) on July 14, 2007
of the game, these guys are not football fans, their businessmen first and foremost, long gone are the days of the local man made good and buying his dream, these guys are in it to make piles of dosh on the back of your club, make no mistake about it, perhaps the exceptions are Shinupadrainpipe, and Abramovic, who wanted buy creditability, and to a large extent has bought it, the former possibly the same, as he now resides in England, but the yanks...oh boy, its dosh, not dreams of glory, its not their game, never has never will be
by Hotclicks.co.uk on August 02, 2007
Nathan, exactly what success was that then that Jol has brought to the club? I must have been asleep for 2 years. If you call finishing in front of Villa, The Geordies, Bolton & Reading success then it is obvious you are a defeatist & did not see any of the success the club acheived some years ago.Success is not being in the Uefa cup (look at the poor quality of teams in it last season). Against the top 4 teams,we have won league one game in 2 seasons under Jol out of a possible 16.We have lost every cup tie against these sides too. The only decent side we met in the Uefa cup, Seville, bombed us out too. Success?Don't make me laugh ffs. Signings of Mido & Rasiak are all we need to know about Jol's brain. Tactically inept at the top level. The club goes nowhere under him. I rest my case.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Leeds United finally profit from sensible dealing - now back to the Premier League!
Shane Williams or Richie McCaw? Why the All Blacks skipper should have been voted world No.1
Wales 21 Australia 18: No great spectacle, Robbie? You must have been watching a different game!