This murky Carlos Tevez transfer travesty is just a circus

Thu, Aug 02, 07 08:36
Rank it:
RSS  Digg  del.icio.us
Carlos Tevez: The saga is getting boring (Gettyimages.com)
The saga of the Argentinian star's proposed move from West Ham to Manchester United has become a big bore. The High Court has to get it sorted out.
'There is no doubt United buying Tevez is a big story, and does deserve column inches, but I think it has had enough. There have been so many twists, turns and allegations'

On August 22, just over a week before the end of the transfer window, the long-running saga that is the Carlos Tevez affair finally goes to the High Court in London for resolution.  I for one cannot wait for that to happen.

Every summer there is one transfer deal that drags out across the off-season, filling endless column inches with gossip, rumour and speculation. The past couple of seasons it has been Thierry Henry’s protracted flirting with Barcelona, but with that deal finally complete, this year Tevez has taken the headlines as he tries to secure a dream move to Manchester United.

There are several reasons I would like to see this transfer resolved; firstly, and most trivially, it's getting boring. Secondly, this affair just reinforces the murkiness and bad reputation English football has been acquiring of late. And finally, it needs to be resolved because this issue will occur again - though for the sake of football, this circus cannot be repeated.

There is no doubt the brilliant Argentinian will be a great signing for Manchester United, so no blame must be attached to them for pursuing it. But please just get the deal done sooner rather than later!

There is no doubt  United buying Tevez is a big story, and does deserve column inches, but I think it has had enough. There have been so many twists, turns and allegations that there has been something nearly every day since the end of the season.

Now rumours are fun, and speculation about transfers is entertaining. But this saga has become ridiculous and tiresome as all parties involved, especially West Ham and Tevez’s agent Kia Joorabchian, have engaged in claim and counter claim through the media. It is bordering on bringing the game into disrepute as allegations of lying and manipulation run riot. It just needs to come to an end. We have had enough.

This saga just reinforces the impression that the world of football transfers is a murky and unpleasant one, often flirting with severe bending and breaking of the rules. In the light of the BBC Panorama programme on bungs, and the general speculation surrounding football, this protracted deal cannot be healthy.

It was hoped Lord Steven’s Quest enquiry would begin to draw a line under the unpleasant workings of the transfer market and see the beginnings of some transparency and honesty. Sadly, the massive publicity surrounding this transfer (and Sheffield United’s relegation) undermines much of the work done to improve the situation.

It also brings into question the Javier Mascherano transfer to Liverpool - how could that have gone through so easily when he was brought to Upton Park under the same conditions as Tevez, owned by Joorabchian? I’m not suggesting Liverpool have done anything wrong. I would just like to know why the discrepancy?

Finally, the fact none of the football authorities were willing to rule on the issue (including FIFA) is also problematic as we are left wondering who has authority to control transfers in the English game. Companies and agents owning players is common place in the South American leagues, and it has been detrimental for both the clubs, who lose money, and many young players who are shipped abroad too early in order to turn a quick profit.

With more players being brought over and at a younger and younger age, this situation will only repeat itself and the unwillingness of the football authorities to take a stand is concerning. Hopefully the High Court ruling will provide something on which the gutless hierarchy of football can build upon and take forwards to avoid having to deal with the same mess in the future.Should the Premier League or FIFA have had the guts to stand up and be counted? Should West Ham be congratulated for their stand? Have you had enough or thie Tevez saga or do you want more? Comments below, please, or submit an article of your own to Sportingo.
Rank it:
RSS  Digg  del.icio.us
Comments
richard avenell (02/08/2007 08:56)
I am a life long Hammer and I feel that I wish we had never signed the guy now .His heroics at the the season will be remembered by Irons fans for years but unfortunately everything else to do with the deal will be remembered by ALL fans for years. Cheers Terry Brown, you always claimed to be a West Ham fan and with this amongst your other great contributions like the Bond Scheme you really proved the best interests of the club were close to your wallet.
TrevorH (02/08/2007 09:19)
At last, someone has written a meaningful article on Carlos Tevez without slagging West Ham off and calling them every name under the sun. I think that all football fans of all clubs have had enough of it now, and it is somewhat worrying that the football authorities cannot sort it out and we now await the result of a court hearing. Unless of course there is an out of court settlement first. I agree with Richard and although we have witnessed a great player at Upton Park, the arrival of the two Argentines unbalanced the squad so much we ended up near the bottom and in all probability cost us a decet manager. This should be a lesson to the PL and more regulation is required otherwise it will happen again. West Ham have acted with a dignified silence since is was made public and I remain convinced that in the light of the new agreement that wasn't signed and lodged with the PL at the correct time by Jooribchian and Tevez, that they have done little wrong. However it didn't help that Ferguson and Gill went publ
Brian (02/08/2007 09:20)
Graham Smith is misunderstanding the role of the Hogh Court in this matter if he thinks it is somehow going to 'sort out' questions of third party ownership in the English Premier League. All the High Court can and will do in this case is rule upon the enforceability or otherwise of certain clauses of the particular contract between Tevez/Joorabchian/MSI and West Ham Football Club. This is now complicated by the fact Joorabchian is claiming that Tevez signed a revision to the original contract in December 2006, converting the three year contract (with Joorabchian free to move Tevez when he liked during the three years) to a one year loan deal, with Joorabchian obliged to move Tevez on this summer. West Ham gave an unsigned copy to the Premier League in February, claiming never to have received a signed copy back from Tevez/MSI. Pity they didn't, because they probably wouldn't have been in so much trouble with the PL if they had received the revised contract, and we would all have been spared this su
hardinga (02/08/2007 09:23)
Dont forget the victims in all of the Tevez debacle, us the fans, we saw a cup final team that finished 9th and could have finished higher had pardew not rested key players to keep them fit for the cup run,(yes he threw a few games for glory) and we dont blame him because although we had the F A cup stolen from us by those thieving scousers for we were by far the better team, we didnt mind because we had a great day and a great season. To put it in a nutshell bye Tevez you caused us more trouble than you were worth, he didnt single handedly save our season, its a team game, and infact he was crap when he first came didnt score for 21 games or something, so roll on season 07/08 new team new hopes. up the Ammers.
West HAm fan no 32 (02/08/2007 09:25)
Also a life long hammers fan, I don't regret Tevez coming or going, he gave his all for the club. I do regret Kia Joorabchian ever having anything to do with Tevez and Mascherano, hopefully this will be a lesson to them both that the guy is only a businessman and a dodgy one at that. Eggert should be congratulated for making a stand, hopefully the fuss that we have made will prevent other dodgy charlatans such as Joorabchian wanting to engage in these dubious practices ! With regards to why Mascherano was able to transfer so easilly, you will find that he wasn't wanted at West Ham apparently due to a complete loss of confidence and was transferred with WHUFC receiving an alleged £150k. FIFA and the FA don't want to litigate because imho they are aware that a high court judgement is a flip of a coin and don't want to leave themselves open to litigation. Hopefully though something can be sorted before the start of the season and this can be put to bed once and for all.
Franco Mizzi (02/08/2007 09:31)
I would like to point out that third party ownership is common with South American players and in relity the only thing which is wrong is that whilst FIFA, UEFA and most of the other National Governing Foot ball associations do not view this in a bad light The FA, on its own, deems it to be illegal. In my opinion it is the FA that have to regulise the situation and come in line with both FIFA & UEFA. What is sure is that the player should not be prevented from working as I seriously believe that this is against EU employment legislation.
kav (02/08/2007 09:33)
If you think youre bored of all this think how us West Ham fans feel, we've been on a non stop roller coaster ride with Tevez ( have we got him havent we ? ), but now we feel sick of it and we'd like to get off thanks ! Just remember until that SLIMEBALL Kia came to our wonderful club the only contraversy we had was that of drinking and gambling amongst players ( I think you have that in every team ). So good riddance of the whole affair ( if and when it comes ) and a long and painful death to SLIMEBALL ! BEWARE MAN Ure
C HAGAN (02/08/2007 09:36)
IAM SICK TO DEATH OF ALL THIS.IT SHOULD END NOW.WHO CARES ANYMORE.NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT CARLOS SNEEKY MEDICAL AT MAN UTD,ARE THEY.IT IS ALL A YOKE AND MAN U LIKE ALL THAT. PEOPLE SHOULD BE INVESTIGATING THEM AND LEAVE US ALONE,WE HAVE BEEN PUNISHED ENOUGH.THANKS COLIN
tony (02/08/2007 09:41)
As a life long fan over 60 years, our good name as a club is now as ditchwater. Every step we take seems to make it worse, so I too wish the matter was over. But two points occur to me. One, how could we be allowed to "tear up" a contract and then say "it therefore never existed". Surely the other party to the contract must have a say ? And two, in real terms, what is the difference between being a players agent and "owning" a player. In both transfer situations the Agent gets a chunk of the transfer fee. Both situations mean there must be a contract between the player and the agent and the player and the club. Neither a Football Club nor an Agent can actually "own" a player, that player "owns" himself and enters into contracts with various other parties. So is this all playing with words in contracts and percentages of transfer fees etc
Jason (02/08/2007 09:49)
TrevorH - you make it sound like West Ham have done nothing wrong in this whole saga and have done football a favour by standing up to Joorabchian. They lied and filed false documents to start with. They voluntarily signed anything that was put in their way to sign Mascherano and Tevez. Then they arbitrarily ripped up this contract after being fined. If I ripped up my mortgage agreement would I expect to keep my house ? The appearance of a new contract signed after Eggert took charge muddies the waters even further. Who owns Tevez ? - It's simple Joorabchian does and he always has ( how else did they end up at West Ham ) no matter what West Ham or the PL have stated. Joorabchian has done nothing wrong from what I can see - he entered into an agreement with West Ham and let his asset reside there. West Ham broke the rules, then ripped up the contract but kept the asset and are now under instruction from the PL ( who are equally to blame for this mess ) to make a handsome profit off of somebody elses
andy (02/08/2007 09:53)
So, you take a few hours out of your time to compose an article claiming to be bored of the Tevez saga ? why are you wasting your time on this subject if it's so irksome ?
billy (02/08/2007 10:40)
Westham are responsible for all these irresponsible saga. I think they should have thrown them out o
TrevorH (02/08/2007 11:20)
In response to Jason I accept that in the beginning West Ham were less than honest regading Tevez and Mascherano. However they owned up to that, disclosed full details, and were duly fined. What your mortgage has got to do with it is a mystery. More important regarding the question of ownership is that West Ham continue to pay his wages. If was clear cut, why would it end up in court? Joorbicham is blameless? This is the person that is wanted in Brazil for money-laundering and there is a warrant out for his arrest. Trust him at your peril. West Ham are absolutely correct in standing up to Jooribcham and I hope that it goes to court in order that West Ham are cleared of dishonest dealing once and for all. However as you know there will be a deal done at the last minute. Like everyone else I want it to go away.
Jason (02/08/2007 13:49)
Trevor, From my perspective of course West Ham will cut a deal out of court as I wouldn't be so sure of West Ham being cleared of dishonest dealing at all - in fact I reckon Eggert AND the PL are desperate to avoid court and any further embarassment in their collusion. My mortgage analogy is : I pay my bank the mortgage payments for my house because I signed an agreement with them. I can't then expect to rip up the agreement, stop payments AND claim ownership and keep my house. Tevez is owned by Joorabchian and was placed at West Ham under a signed contract. West Ham ripped it up and yet kept Tevez and now expect a transfer fee ?? !! Come on, like I said if I was Joorabchian I'd be taking WH to court too.
TrevorH (02/08/2007 15:47)
Jason, you do seem to be missing the point. WHU have admitted the offence and have been fined. The independent arbitration panel concluded that the PL conducted the original hearing fairly and reasonably. The chairman of Sheff Utd went to court and was told he didn't have a case to answer. Where is the problem? West Ham continue to pay the wages of Carlos Tevez because he is contracted to pay for them Therefore West ham determine what happens to him this summer. Sure it is clouded with Jooribchian in the background but it he that has more to lose and it is Jooribchian that will agree to the deal. Although he has started court proceedings, I bet that he will back down whereas WHU are happy to defend their position. And I do believe that the PL have acted properly throughout the entire process as has been confirmed. Why should they collude? The judgement of many people is clouded because they wanted (without legal precedents for guidance) points deducted from WHU. This hasn't happened rightly or wrongly. It ne
TrevorH (02/08/2007 15:51)
Continuation of previous submission....... This hasn't happened rightly or wrongly. It needs to be resolved to allow Tevez to continue his career. My absolute belief is that West Ham HAVE not been treated unfairly and it is all a matter of public record for those that want to bother researching it properly.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED







*
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team




Daily Poll

Who will win the Champions League?