Home > Football > Roy Keane has spent over £35m, but where's the quality in Sunderland's buys?
by David Combe on 31 August 2007
Email this Article (22) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Comments (22)
by Andy Trotter on August 31, 2007
Why is it that the press love to build people up to knock them down. Last Season Roy Keane couldn't do a thing wrong, now his judgement is suspect in the transfer market. The difference is he is buying players WHO WANT TO PLAY FOR SUNDERLAND as opposed to the mercenaries that agents try to hawk. Staying up will be difficult but in Roy Keane and Niall Quinn we have people who care about our club and that counts for a hell of a lot in the current climate !!
by luke on August 31, 2007
your comments are staggerring, how do you know the players sunderland have signed wont be a success ? 18m forone player is more laughable in bent.
by Simon White on August 31, 2007
As a wba fan I can tsetify to mcShane's failings. He is capable of playing good games and is easiliy noticable by his flame red hair. He does however lack real quality in his distribution, has no pace and does not have the physical presence to be a top defender in the Premiership. In my view he is not good enough for the Albion side let alone to be regarded as good enough to deal with the likes of Rooney, Ronaldo, Drogba and company. 35 million does buy you a lot of quality but I cannot see what Roy has spent it all on.
by Bert on August 31, 2007
Chopra has made a good start especially as you say he's scored against Derby when Sunderland haven't even played them yet! Ronaldo and Van Persie would have Baresi turning circles nevermind Mcshane. John Terry is not exactly lightning now is he?
by Kevin on August 31, 2007
Jones scored 14 goals in 25 starts and for a 22 year old, I think that's fantastic and not "palty". How can you honestly say that his signings aren't good when the majority are up and coming which could turn out to be class? And you probably haven't seen half of them. Why can you not write an article on facts? Like the fact that we have had a decent start to the season; the fact that we had great results against Spurs and Brum; and even the fact that we've had a few poor games. I've always been told never to assume things, and if you assume that these are poor signings then you might end up having egg on your face!
by Simon on August 31, 2007
Would have to agree with the comments made about K Jones, as a Southampton fan I can appreciate that Roy Keane sees him as an athletic player - but is nowhere near the standard of a premier league player - and £6m? I know the current transfer climate is once again ridiculous...but seriously?
by micky on August 31, 2007
yet another numpty talking out of his rear end.judge the signings at the end of the season pal.if you haven't realised transfer fees have gone through the roof with all this money coming in so all teams are paying that bit extra for players. 5 million for chopra is peanuts compared to some transfer fees 18 million for bent 17 million for nani 21 million for torres, yes there all good players but the transfer fees are crazy.mcshane could turn out to be the signing of the season at 1.5 million. tony adams, steve bould,sammy hypia all great defenders who were not the quickest so your theory has been shot down in flames there.
by JonnieTheBlue on August 31, 2007
I agree with the sentiment, that Keane has paid ridiculous amount of money for average championship players. However I'd just like to comment that this is probably the worst piece of journalism I've ever read! Chorpa scoring against Derby, Higginbottom coming from Man Utd, Jones stats, etc. I'd recommend you check your facts before posting and also stop using Wikipedia as a source of information.
[quote]yet another numpty talking out of his rear end.judge the signings at the end of the season pal.if you haven't realised transfer fees have gone through the roof with all this money coming in so all teams are paying that bit extra for players. 5 million for chopra is peanuts compared to some transfer fees 18 million for bent 17 million for nani 21 million for torres, yes there all good players but the transfer fees are crazy.mcshane could turn out to be the signing of the season at 1.5 million. tony adams, steve bould,sammy hypia all great defenders who were not the quickest so your theory has been shot down in flames there.[/quote] It only appears to be Sunderland though where prices have gone this far out of control.
by NiallsBack on August 31, 2007
For many years Sunderland have been left wandering through the wilderness of journalism, with only a smattering of news reports making the light of day and normally done so in such a way to demean the club at every opportunity. In step Roy Keane and Niall Quinn and suddenly everyone with access to a keyboard seems to think they are suddenly some kind of footballing mastermind, with years of experience and expertise regarding Sunderland, with some kind of god given right of divinity to pass critical judgement on ever single decision being made by the clubs officials. However, like so many other Sunderland related reports that are somehow managing to thrust their way to the surface from the lower reaches of the seemingly bottomless pit of uninspired, predictability, avoiding a well deserved suffocation with the aid of such media outlets as NewsNow, reports such as this, which normally in the past would have themselves been left in the wilderness were they would thoroughly deserve to fester, regrettably reade
regrettably readers are now being faced with what has become an unrelenting assault of these inadequately thought out, uninformed, mimicked copy and paste style abominations, throwing one sided points of poorly put together details, clearly drawn from other sources, in order one has to assume, to achieve little more than assassinating the intended target and to gain cheap hits and impressions for advertisements, where as in reality, such journalism does little more than ridicule the credibility of the site daring to allow such rubbish and shows just how low standards of journalism can be and what lengths of desperation some sites will go to if this is the best they have to offer.
It is has been clear to most Sunderland fans since the day of promotion to the Premiership, that Roy Keane would have to take the stance of high risk speculation by spending sumptuous amounts of money on players, in order to stand any chance of survival in the top flight of English football, it is also clearer still that Roy Keane has invested primarily in players that he feels will be good long term prospects of his team as well as those that willing to join the club on the back of two previous devastating campaigns in the Premiership and not just fashion accessory players who the media have taken a fancy to and the comment posted by this particular journalist “you cannot build a five-star hotel with twigs and a crisp packet”, is both insulting and a completely inaccurate analogy of what Roy Keane is doing for Sunderland. Yes, excessive money has moved between clubs for what in some cases could be seen as untested players, but that certainly does not mean that those players will not grow into their new rol
roles and prove to be good value in the long term, which yes, believe it or not, is what Roy Keane is actually working towards. Damn the crap character limit on this site... ><
by JM on August 31, 2007
[quote]I agree with the sentiment, that Keane has paid ridiculous amount of money for average championship players. However I'd just like to comment that this is probably the worst piece of journalism I've ever read! Chorpa scoring against Derby, Higginbottom coming from Man Utd, Jones stats, etc. I'd recommend you check your facts before posting and also stop using Wikipedia as a source of information.[/quote] If you could read it would help before you criticise. The writer of this article wrote: "Keane did get some former United team-mates in - step forward Danny Higginbotham and Kieran Richardson, hardly the calibre of the aforementioned names and overpriced at the same time." What is wrong with that? Higginbottom WAS once a Manchester United player, and stating that he is ex-Man Utd doesnt mean to say that he is coming to Sunderland directly from Man Utd. You are correct in pointing out the mistake made concerning Chopra scoring against Derby - but this is hardly the crux of the argument is
is it? Infact it is irrelevant to the main argument. So stop being pedantic.
[quote][quote]I agree with the sentiment, that Keane has paid ridiculous amount of money for average championship players. However I'd just like to comment that this is probably the worst piece of journalism I've ever read! Chorpa scoring against Derby, Higginbottom coming from Man Utd, Jones stats, etc. I'd recommend you check your facts before posting and also stop using Wikipedia as a source of information.[/quote] If you could read it would help before you criticise. The writer of this article wrote: "Keane did get some former United team-mates in - step forward Danny Higginbotham and Kieran Richardson, hardly the calibre of the aforementioned names and overpriced at the same time." What is wrong with that? Higginbottom WAS once a Manchester United player, and stating that he is ex-Man Utd doesnt mean to say that he is coming to Sunderland directly from Man Utd. You are correct in pointing out the mistake made concerning Chopra scoring against Derby - but this is hardly the crux of the argum
by Trevor on August 31, 2007
As a Man U fan i have been eagerly keeping an eye on Keanes Progression. Roys biggest problem has been attracting people who want to come play for Sunderland. With Sunderlands history of up one season down the next, ( No offence intended) you are competing for players that can go to established premiership teams. Take Baines for example.. Everton or Sunderland... Everton are less risk and are contending for eurpoean football. So what did Roy do? By the looks of it he has brought in some experience in Harte, Cole. Tried to strengthen the Defence with Mcshane, higg and halford. Broguht in the best strikers that were available and wanted to come to sunderland. And along with that a Goal Keeper at a young age who will win you points this season! The boy is good! I know it is a small minority of fans that jump on the clubs back at the first oppertunity. one thing to ask yourself, if you could have picked better players to sign would they have wanted to sign for sunderland. The answer would probaly be no..
by john White on August 31, 2007
Its a poor article but I wouldn`t pick this one out particularly, many writers had high expectations of Sunderland then love putting the boot in after just two poor results(I don`t include liverpool they are a different stronger prospect this season)So lets cut Roy some slacjk its been a year in amangement,the trasnfer market is completely over heated and football lovers can take a step back and see the context rather than just be negative ...it sells papers but ultimately it means i wont come to this website again i want an intellegent artcile not this nonesense
by Niall Quinn on August 31, 2007
We are really doing what Reading did when they came up, buying hungry players who want to give their blood, sweat and tears for the club. We may not hav quality but we have passion
by andy on August 31, 2007
Firstly can I say you obviously know your football and are obviously very wise in the world of football but I would like to say at least for the first time SAFC's board are backing their manager and having a real go, all buys come with a risk what about the 20 odd million Man U spent on Veron! hardly set the world alight. McShane has been man of the match or close to on each game he has played, Gordon looks quality, and working alot in edinburgh I know they were gutted to loose him. Jones and Chopera two hungry 22 & 23 year olds eager to prove themselves and I cold go on. At least as Roy has said we have not spent 10 million on one player and given 60k in wages. Time will tell
by Quinny on September 02, 2007
If you know so much about journalism, why don't you have a go at writing something instead of slagging off the real "fans" that write on this site, no-one has said this site is written by journalists? I'd rather read stuff from fans than crap from people paid to write spin.
by peterquinn on September 03, 2007
How is your editor letting you get away with writing this stuff.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name