Home > Football > Arsenal's No.1 problem could derail their title challenge
by Tim Love on 04 October 2007
Email this Article (45) Comments
Free £25 bet when you register at
For a team at the top of the Premier League who are also unbeaten in the Champions League, now might not be the best time to pose the question: Do Arsenal have a goalkeeping crisis? And for a side performing fantastically well at the moment, perhaps it is inappropriate to be looking at what I perceive to be quite a negative topic.
There is little doubt that Manuel Almunia is now first-choice goalkeeper, and I would like to concentrate on his stature before looking at Jens Lehmann. The reason it has come to the forefront of my mind (again) is Almunia's potential to allow a rush of blood to the head.
In the Steau Bucharest game on Tuesday night, were it not for Kolo Toure's quick thinking, Bucharest would have taken the lead after Almunia legged it out of his area like a cat on pills to head away what was a harmless long ball. This is not the best example of his tendency to do somewhat silly things, but it illustrates that he is much the same player he has always been throughout his time at Arsenal, an excellent shot-stopper who is not wholly reliable.
It is not easy to find many goalkeepers who a) instal confidence into their defence; b) are excellent shot stoppers; c) do not faff around on corners; and d) do not make ridiculous decisions. But they can be found. As much as I hate to say it, Petr Cech is a phenomenal player. I don't think I have ever seen a goalkeeper as influential as Cech since Schmeichel (that's Peter not Kasper, he's rubbish) and I think Jose Mourinho agrees with me.
There is little doubt that Stephen Hunt's horrendous challenge on him cost Chelsea quite a few points last season, which is more evidence of how pivotal an excellent goalkeeper can be. Now, the Almunia fans will state that in the last nine games, the Spaniard has only conceded two goals. And I also concede that he has looked better this season than in previous years. My worry is that over the course of the whole season, will he make quite a few Robinson-style mistakes which could cost us valuable points?
The key problem is Lehmann's form in the early part of this season, meaning we do not have an obvious first-choice goalkeeper any more. I won't forget the game against Fulham for quite a while. I and my friends had a few beers before the game (it is disturbing how easily they went down at 10 in the morning) and were full of optimism for the new season. We had literally only just sat down after applauding the players onto the pitch when Lehmann made a ridiculous mistake. This could be forgiven were it not for the fact that he did it again in our next game against Blackburn. Add this to the fact that he has been prone to big errors in the past (as have many goalkeepers, admittedly) and I don't think he fills the defence with confidence.
He did, of course, have a wonderful season in 2005-6, and although he was sent off in the Champions League final, we might not have been there were it not for his penalty save against Villarreal. But sentiment aside, he looked a bit dodgy last season and of course has struggled so far this term. There is no doubting that he is an excellent goalkeeper and I truly appreciate his efforts for the club. But there comes a time when you have to discard sentiment in favour of harsh reality.
I am sure many of you are wondering why I have not suggested Lukasz Fabianski as a replacement . Well, it's simple; he is far too young. He did put in an excellent, assured performance against Newcastle in the Carling Cup, but young goalkeepers need to be eased into first-team action. Kasper Schmeichel might have received a lot of praise this season, but I think this is more to do with who his dad is rather than his actual performances which have seen him flapping at balls like a duck on vodka. (I don't know why the only metaphors I can think of are to do with animals on drugs or alcohol).
So what are the alternatives (assuming Arsene Wenger is reading this)? Well, in the short term, there is no need to do anything. Almunia deserves his chance after waiting in the wings, and so far he has not made any major errors. But I feel it is essential to buy a top-quality keeper in the January transfer window. Before long, I believe the errors will come and they will start to cost us points. I really hope I am proved wrong, as Almunia works hard in training and wants to play for the club. One more thing on an unrelated issue. Bu*ger off Usmanov, no-one believes anything you say and you did not fall in love with the team when Wenger took charge because you would not have tried to buy Spurs if you loved the Arsenal so much.
Please visit my blog at www.arsenalinsider.blogspot.com regularly!
Comments (45)
by Steve on October 04, 2007
Almunia has been playing well and Fabianski looked very assured on his debut against the Geordies. I think there was more of a problem last season when Le Boss persisted with Mad jens with Almunia deserved an opportunity.
by gaya on October 04, 2007
Dida the AC Milan goal keeper won a champion's league medal. If ur defenders dont help out then your keeper can fly all he wants
by osas on October 04, 2007
I am a lot more comfortable with Almunia in goal than Lehman. While he might still not be the best decision maker, he is a lot more sharper, athletic and faster than Lehman. These days when we concede corner kicks s he is a lot sharper and he has made the routine saves required of him. 7 clean sheets says it all when you consider we kept only 20 the whole of last season. I think Almunia is entitled to one or two mistakes when you consider that he has been on the bench for 3 years. At least his mistakes haven't cost us which is most important factor we have to look at when judging him.
by Old codger on October 04, 2007
Tim, Why try to create the illusion of a problem when there isn't one? Why do people always have to find something to whinge about? It's about time that all the negative old whingers out there shut the f##k up & realised that they are wrong! Since Henry quit (did he jump before he was pushed?) the TEAM has grown stronger & stronger. We are no longer made up of a few prima-donnas, we now have people working together for each other. We don't have any weaknesses, perhaps we do have areas where we can become stronger & we will become stronger by sticking together & helping each other to improve. Tim, if you want to find something to really be worried about go & support Spu#s or Liverpool or Chelski or some mob that really do have problems.
by Stu Bailey on October 04, 2007
I like Almunia and agree he is a good shot stopper. However, I don't think he can take all the plaudits for winning games. I think the defense are a lot stronger and organised this season, protecting the keeper a lot more. Maybe Almunia hasn't had much to do recently??
by Tim on October 04, 2007
I acknowledge in the article that the team is doing well etc, I am just worried if he can last over the course of the season. Just calm down.
by Australian Gooner on October 04, 2007
When so much is right about the first team performances and depth of the squad, we as fans, still need to find fault in some area of the team we love so much. I believe your article to be close to my thoughts and concerns for when times become harder than they are now, and things are not going our way. The true strength of the strongest teams has always been measured on points that come from the backbone of a team. Peter Schmeikel was worth 10-15 points a year to ManUre way back when. Cech is worth the same to Chelski. The spine of Schmeikel Palister Ince or Cech Terry Makalele or Seaman Adams Vieira all sound strong, and they were. We need a goal keeper and central defender to partner Kolo Toure. I am concerned for our backline when the African Cup of nations gets underway, because I am not convinced by Almunia Senderos Fabrigas. I agree with your sentiments on Almunia, and myself believe he will never be more than adequate. We at Arsenal should never be satisfied with adequate. I trust Arsene Wenger. Howe
by Getu on October 04, 2007
Jens Lemann made money more errors than Alumunia so that I think he is better than and arsenal will continue using Aluminia
by Frichie on October 04, 2007
LOL, anyone who mentions Fabregas when talking about the backline, cannot expect their opinion to be credited. Almunia may not look like a great great goal keeper, but he has been on the bench for years, with the odd game. Wenger wouldnt have kept him around if he wasnt a good keeper. What he needs is playing time, and i feel with each game he is gettin better and better. Granted he hasnt had many saves to make, and that comes down to organisation of the back line. Are we not more organised with him that Lehman? Maybe he didnt set his wall right for the Spuds goal, or maybe it was just the wall that shifted!. I am happy to see him in Goal, and we will see some fantastic saves from him in the season. I just hope Mad Jens, doesnt go poison his food or something to reclaim his spot!