Home > Football > Is the Wayne Rooney-Carlos Tevez partnership the Premier League's best ever?
by Graham Smith on 30 October 2007
Email this Article (71) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
Comments (71)
by Joel Cairo on October 30, 2007
I'm not even sure that they're better than the partnership of Ronaldo with anyone last year, or Henry with anyone. Give it two years, and the league time to figure them out, and then get back to us.
by Jay Wollis on October 30, 2007
not that i have anything against the two but how on earth can you even ask this stupid question? they've only played together for 3months and for 2 and a half of those the general concensus was that it wasn't working. really mate you must be on glue to dream up such a stupid article and then actually go ahead and post it. is this your first? if so, spare us all and give it up NOW!!! what an absolute tool!!!
by trader on October 30, 2007
There are some bad articles on this site but this has to be the worst yet.
by CW on October 30, 2007
Errrrr....no.
by Chegs on October 30, 2007
After 10 games? Grow up buddy - Shearer & Sutton / Yorke & Cole / Bergkamp & Henry had at least 2 seasons with each other, thus being labelled in this catagory.....who writes this cr*p?
by Big Daddy Rules on October 30, 2007
They're not even the best partnership in Man Utd. And don't ever compare the knuckle dragging Rooney to TH14 again, let alone trying to compare the West Ham reject Tevez to DB10.
by JASON on October 30, 2007
DONT TALK SOFT
by Chippy on October 30, 2007
by Colie on October 30, 2007
Typical utd fan, jumps on one or two good games together and they're the best that we are ever going to see, after paying £30 million quid for rooney he's only now after three seasons starting to fulfill any kind of promise with scoring goals.As for tevez I think you'll get frustated with him, another over-rated player and not just cause he's with utd, but when people were goin' on about him at the world cup, he did nothing to impress me apart from work hard, he's certainly no messi, which neither is rooney and both would be lucky to clean his boots.
Any chance of an article on the best centre-half pairings (Ferdinand-Brown) or central midfield partnerships (Scholes-Smith)? Keep up the good work!
by JUD CASPER on October 30, 2007
ID RATHER HAVE SAMARAS AND CORRADI !!
by billynick on October 30, 2007
typical manure play well for a couple of games and its the best ever , not even in the top ten yet, i understand yhe currency @ ot is the euro as theres no mancs supporting them they ship em in from all over if you could only support the the team in the city you lived in they would never have moved from salford
by Fergie on October 30, 2007
The King of Kings and the King of the primates
by Mattyhammers on October 30, 2007
Ridiculous article! Nothing proved yet at all. I'm a West Ham fan and even I know the best two partnerships ever, Rush and Dalglish, Keegan and Toshack.
by Jules on October 30, 2007
Three words settle this ridiculous question: Henry and Bergkamp
by robm on October 30, 2007
This article is a total 'waste of ink' - they've hardly played together - and this article has only come about because of a couple of goals against one of the poorest sides in the Premiership. Get a life and write about something sensible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ID RATHER HAVE SAMARAS AND CORRADI !! ALL THE WAY. THEYRE BETTER LOOKIN AN ALL :)
by Mark the YID on October 30, 2007
After ten games.. are you serious. Ridiculous article and question
by marco polo on October 30, 2007
[quote]typical manure play well for a couple of games and its the best ever , not even in the top ten yet, i understand yhe currency @ ot is the euro as theres no mancs supporting them they ship em in from all over if you could only support the the team in the city you lived in they would never have moved from salford[/quote] people move around dickhead!! unless like you the have a masodistic love of living in shit council house in mosside. what a knob you are. so by your logic a family that moves from the north east to london through work commitments and who support either nufc,mfc or sfc need to start supporting a london team or bringing their children up supporting a london team???? get a grip sad case, people move around more than ever and just because someone lives 50,60 or 100miles from the club doesn't mean they don't have ties to it.
by Spirit of Beauty on October 30, 2007
I think they look fantastic together. Their facial beauty and body forms are second to none. They are indeed two precious little things. Wow.
by keg on October 30, 2007
Isn't this a little premature question? Personally I doubt they'll even compare to Jimmy and Eiður in the 2001-2002 season (52 goals between them, 36 in the Premier League).
by bergy on October 30, 2007
dont you have anything better to o than think up uttr garbage like this.this is one of the website I try to avoid.... cant believe someone can write this crap day after day
by Courtney on October 30, 2007
"Where the others all had a major flaw or weakness, such as lack of strength, or inventiveness, Rooney and Tevez display no such Achilles heel." most stupid comment of the lot, and there is a lot in that piece. No Achilles heel? They are both Oompah Loompahs, wouldn't win anything in the air against Jimmy Crankie and Kylie. Ridiculous.
by Jonas on October 30, 2007
I must mention the partnership of Robbie Fowler and Stan Collymore which I think is the greates ever parnership along with Cole and York. Rooney and Teves are looking very good but they are are long way from those to pairs that I have mentioned. I think it´s unfair and to be honest very stupid to be talking about them as the best striker pair because they have only been playing together for 2 months. They are looking good but only time will tell if they will be the best ever.
COLLYMORE MR BLOBBY HAHAHA
by TonyS on October 30, 2007
Yeah I thin they are a guddest strikers eva and untd will thrash those "gonners" 5 to zero on Satday. Rooney score 3 and Tevez socre 3 each.