Home > Football > Manchester United make the point that Arsenal have a fight on their hands
by Philip Smith on 04 November 2007
Email this Article (15) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Comments (15)
by LB on November 04, 2007
So Arsenal did not overwhelm Man U and that's a disaster? All these desperate Spurs, Man U, etc. fans who predicted gloom for Arsenal now say we didn't dominate Man U?? How about the fact that our back four cost a total of some GBP2m net, and Man U's cost GBP40m odd. Is it not just embarassing after the great Fergie suggested that Arsenal would be bankrupted by the Emirates Stadium, and that all of you said Arsenal were broke? Well, not only did we build the stadium, all the bitter comments in the world from Ferguson will not change the fact that Arsenal are a great club and unlike pre-Wenger, Ferguson actually has competition now, and he hates it. Clearly so do you. Your bitterness shines through. I look forward to return match at Old Trafford because we will beat Man U there without doubt.
by King on November 04, 2007
I think the story is the other way round. Man U are still the stronger team, and just because Arsenal are league leaders doesnt make them favourites. They are still a young squad and all the applause they coolected was because they surely are in the title fight, and not because they have already won it. And plz dont count Chelsea out.....they are bouncing or rather leaping there way back with every game. The season is open and i think these three have an equally good chance, although Man U's experience might just edge them ahead, but its not certain.....as i said it 'might'. either ways we are in for a cracker of a season.
by cesco on November 04, 2007
I wish this site can have a fair and balanced view of the game. 1.man utd came with disrupting tactics which for a big team is suprising.They wanted to stop arsenal from playing their game and they succede in doing that in the first half. 2. the stats don't lie arsenal had more shots on target and more possesion. 3. arsenal team cost 37mil compared to 147mil man utd team cost. 4. man utd are a great team with top quality players and will not give up retaining their title but credit has to be given to arsenal, they have started well which they haven't done in previous seasons and are building confidence and character for ttheir young team, r they going to win the league? nobobody knows but at least they are going to make a fight of it.
by Patrick on November 04, 2007
It´s interesting how the views have changed from the beginning of the season. Now we are expected to win against Utd and that they showed quality by leading twice. The way I see it Arsenal showed title credentials simply by coming back from behind twice and that they could raise their game when they needed to. Also, I agree with King that it´s to early to predict the winner of the title already and Chelsea are back in the mix.
by Turkson on November 04, 2007
A draw at Emirates means your team has retained the title? We're not even in December. Don't you know last year Arsenal earned the double against MANU but yet struggled? I'm sure you cried yesterday 'cos Arsenal forced a draw, but for Arsenal's defensive lapses. If Arsenal had taken the lead in the matches against both POOL and MANU, they would have won. One don't need to beat MANU before you win the title. There are 38 games in a season and losing to MANU is no big deal. People like you don't give credit to Arsenal as Arsenal is challenging without spending a fraction of the money that MANU and Chelsea dole out. For people like you, you dream MANu and Chelsea should always spend and buy the title at the expense of other teams.
by Cesco on November 04, 2007
[quote]A draw at Emirates means your team has retained the title? We're not even in December. Don't you know last year Arsenal earned the double against MANU but yet struggled? I'm sure you cried yesterday 'cos Arsenal forced a draw, but for Arsenal's defensive lapses. If Arsenal had taken the lead in the matches against both POOL and MANU, they would have won. One don't need to beat MANU before you win the title. There are 38 games in a season and losing to MANU is no big deal. People like you don't give credit to Arsenal as Arsenal is challenging without spending a fraction of the money that MANU and Chelsea dole out. For people like you, you dream MANu and Chelsea should always spend and buy the title at the expense of other teams.[/quote] Totally agree with you, the figures don't lie, arsenal are competing in europe and domestically spending a fraction of other teams and in some cases playing better football, imagine if wenger had the resources that mourinho or sir alex has had over the years
by Jeff on November 04, 2007
Mancs supporters look like jealous bunch. Credit to Arsenal for the way they played. Chelsea is back into the reckoning.
by kola on November 04, 2007
Some things infuriate me. The way some people reason, the way some people present their points while claiming to understand what they are doing. I understand this sense of pride that the ManU faithful has, this ego problem that makes you guys embrace the positives and look for excuses for failings here and there. At the beginning of the season, you were examining the purchases of "your main rivals" - Pizarro, Malouda, Babel, Benayoun, Torres etcetera. Arsenal had reduced to practically nothing. You bought Tevez, Nani, Hargreaves, Anderson. You spent money and believed that the main contenders would be those stocking their pile with the most established talents in the game. Arsenal had to come fifth since Spuds had bought Bale, Kaboul, Bent etcetera. The fact that the ones that bought the unknown Sagna, Eduardo and some others are avoiding defeat against you guys alone is worthy of praise. Last year, Arsenal came to your theatre and scored a late goal. You could not respond. Ths year, you scored a late goal a
by Ned on November 04, 2007
I think the most frustrating thing about this site is the fact thatopinion pieces are continuously shot down as "poor journalism", "disgraceful", "biased" etc - The critics are always too chicken to actually write an article of their own though, just write something yourself if you are such unbiased brilliant writers!
by Joel Cairo on November 04, 2007
<i> United, for their part, will probably feel the happier of the two antagonists, having gained a point away from home as opposed to Arsenal losing two points at home.</i><br> Are you serious? I don't think so. Watch Rio elbow Cesc. Watch the two managers to figure out who is happier -- late draws always bouy the comeback team and sour the loser. Man U played like it was second-best yesterday, hanging back, changing what they do best, in fear of what Arsenal can do. They may yet win -- after all, the added four 20M players to a team which had crushed the league -- but they will walk away from this one with serious doubts about the certainty of a repeat.
by Jordan Taylor-Bartels on November 05, 2007
I, for one, do not think that the article was as bias as you think it to be... The build-up of the game, however, was not as distinct as how it was Mr Smith. I believe it was Clichy and Gallas who had snippets of them saying that they would match United - in which they evidently did. Arsenal did match them and the 2-2 draw and the actual game is only evidence for this. Importantly, from reading the comments left on this article, you (as I assume avid and passionate supporters of Football) need to let your guard down and be rational yourselves. Manchester United did show some glimpses of utter brilliance, yet so did Arsenal. You can argue who should of won - but in the end it was, an intense, draw. Arsenal are still up for the title, but as someone else stated, so are Chelsea, Manchester United and possibly Liverpool. The Gates to that Silver are still wide open.
by Larry Kwirirayi on November 05, 2007
Noone said anything Arsenal dominating Manchester United. If anything the smart money was on the reds who had were hitting goal-scoring form at the right time. it's an interesting article of incomparable bias but hey who am I to say?
by Deon on November 06, 2007
I as a Arsenal fan was looking forward to the clash of these two titans, but what I saw disapointed me. Why did Manchester United with A SO CALLED class outfit come and put up barracades rather then actually play football, and then owen hargreaves has the nerve to claim Arsenal were scrappy? dah! what is Arsenal suppose to do when Anderson and Hargeaves were out just tackle rather then play football? and you Man U fans call this being effective all I saw was once hargreaves/anderson won the football (bordering on savage attacks) passing the ball to ferdinand and vidic to long ball it to ronaldo,giggs, tevez and rooney is not football its called bitch soccer. Even Barcelona found it hard to take playing Rangers who did what Man U did to Arsenal be physical and hit long balls on the counter. I don't see how a side that can just sit back and run really fast after a long ball can be called a good footballing team. No wonder why in champions league MAn U struggle you don't get leaneacy from refs like Howard gave
by DT10 on November 06, 2007
For the amount of money he cost shouldn't Anderson be able to decipher between an Arsenal players legs and the ball? He is of course Wolverine as when Fabregas admittedly caught him late he was screaming like a little girl but in the time it took for biased Webb ( he turned down two penalties and just let Anderson keep kicking everybody) to get out his yellow card he had miraculously recovered.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
England must scrape the bottom and turn to Spurs for wide-left salvation