Home > Football > Why Arsenal and Manchester United's first team are better than England
by Tom Clancy on 19 November 2007
Email this Article (18) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
Comments (18)
by Dicko on November 19, 2007
Id would say Chelsea and Liverpool are also better than England as are a few other Premiership teams, they train together week in week out and get to know each others strengths and weaknesses and form partnerships and understandings. Englands personal might look more impressive but until they train regually they will never be as productive as most Premiership teams.
by bupe siwila on November 19, 2007
by Gereyesus on November 19, 2007
To me, most England players have got skills. But the majority lacks commitment, except J.Terry,J.Cole, P. Right and Gerard. If they change Carson now on goal keeping, I think they will improve that. Gebreyeus
by Sherief Razzaque on November 19, 2007
I'll take Zambrotta over those 2 any day, but France have great depth in that position for years to come. Left back is one of the few areas England have quality.
by Jako on November 19, 2007
i had the same conversation with a young man utd fan last week. he was talking about a capping of foreign players in the premiership. i told him that this would destroy the best league in the world. furthermore, the reason there are not many english players in the top clubs, arsenal especially, is simply because english players are not good enough to play for these world class teams. roony is just about world class, his temperement lets him down, gerrard could be one of the best driving midfielders in the game, but one player is not the team. personally Micah Richards seems to be the one exciting player we have. Owen is massively over-rated, he would never get in arsenal, united, chelsea or liverpool. i would actually struggle to put him in the newcastle team over Viduka and Martins. Lampard is an arrogant over-paid, two-bit peice of crap who should be dropped from the england squad just to teach him a lesson.
by ASTRIT on November 19, 2007
I THINK THAT ARSENAL IS BETTER THAN HERY BECAUSE NOW THE YOUNG PLAYERS HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW TALENT LIKE TEO VALKOT ,VAN PERSI FABREGAS AND OTHERS AND I THINK THAT THIS YEAR ARSENAL WILL WON ANY TROPHY LIKE PREMIER LEAGUE OR CHAMPIONS LEAGUE. IF ARSENAL CONTINUE TO GIVE THE OPPORTUNITY THE YOUNG PLAYERS EXAMPLE IN NEXT SEASON LIKE FRAN MERIDA.MAT CONOLLY,LANSBURY WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE
by Roy on November 19, 2007
I agree totaly and I think a lot kids are scared away from football at a very early age by trainers who are more interested in winning trophies than they are teaching footballing skills. I live in Denmark where the same sort of thing seems to be the case, teams seem to be heavily populated by tall strapping lads and players with a lot of ball skill are few and far between!
by Daniel on November 19, 2007
WENGER IS THE BEST I WILL SAY THIS OVER AND OVER DESPITE THE YOUNG BOYS HE IS USING HE HAS BEEN ABLE TO GO 18 MATCHES UNBEATEN ARSENAL 4 LIFE
by Bitter N Twisted on November 19, 2007
I am a gooner and I think ashley cole is a mug, but lets get this straight he is better than evra and clichy. next time he plays against ronaldo watch as he keeps him in his pocket. Trust me i cant stand him but no one gets the better of him. besides that i agree with your points.
by Andrew on November 19, 2007
Wouldn't Owen be able to get in one of the top 4 sides? As far as I know, he'd be pretty good in all of them actually. He's surely a better goal getter, then any arsenal player! Yes, even that shit RVP and that tall one. He'd get in the chelsea side easily (better than sheva, kalou and that bayern guy easily). And he'd have a good 3rd choice in united(sometimes 2nd) after rooney and tevez. Saha's always injured so he's no use. And please. be objective; Arse-nal are not the best team in Englans or europe. they don't have world class (proven) players on any position. Not even one??
by Tarek on November 19, 2007
I think england have really good players, in all the positions, but there problem to me was with the managers they have had, ericsson and mclaren havent been that good, and some of their decisions have been really bad and costly.England have skillful players to cover all the positions, especially in midfield,but i think they havemt been using them the way they should.U see them in their respective teams and they all play really well, passing , shooting etc..,but when it comes to england things change.Also in midfield,although i love bekcham, i think it is time to move on,and give SWphilips a chance, he is different, fast and skilfull,something that england need down the wings,and him and richards have mixed it well together.Carrick should be given a chance,because he has great vision and very accurate passes and arent all about lobbing it up the field.I think its just a new manager and more diversification in the team that england need to be successful
by Baap on November 20, 2007
England is exactly the kind of team Jose Mourinho owould like disciplened players longball players strikers who can tap it in one 1 clear chance good defence Give it to him............and he'll win it for us !!!!!!!
by Joel Cairo on November 20, 2007
Fact is any squad who practice together almost every day for nine months will have an advantage over an international team. In some ways, the country who wins the World or European Cup is the one whose squad gels as a true team fastest in the 4-6 weeks of intense togetherness they have in the finals. But familiarity and teamwork can make a team of inferior talent a world-beater. Second is the talent, and there you ought to look at the coaching in the Prem, not the players -- why is it that the Big Four (plus the wannabe club) cannot find a top world-class manager from England? That's where the problem is!
by Larry Kwiirirayi on November 20, 2007
I think Derby could beat England right now or at worst force a draw
by Anon on November 20, 2007
Arsenal fans on here get funnier and funnier. So Scholes and Fabregas are better than Gerrard now? Hahahaha, good one. Clichy is nowhere near the best in the world. He's not even best in the Prem, Cole, and Evra are both better, and up until this season Brige and Riise have been better too. Arsenal fan in getting carried away shocker. I guess your two 4th place finishes just gone really stung.
P.s. you are right that the England side wouldn't beat an Arsenal or Man U side (or Liverpool or Chelsea for that matter), but your other points are fruity.
by Wies on November 22, 2007
That performance from England last night was terrible, firstly the formation clearly showed thatmclaren has no spne, why not just 4-4-2 with Defoe next to crouch, or better yet with Theo, all arsenal fans haveseen what he is capable of this season,especially down the middle. I really dont think the debate about to many internationals playng in England has any effect on the national team, on the contrary young english players can learn so much from the likes of Drogba, Cesc, Torres etc.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *