Home > Football > Why did Steven Gerrard not express support for his beleaguered Liverpool boss?
by Jaimie Kanwar on 28 November 2007
Email this Article (178) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
On the eve of arguably the most crucial game of the season, Steven Gerrard stuck his oar into the ongoing problems at Anfield with pointless comments that arguably display his lack of support for Rafael Benitez. Gerrard was never slow to voice support for Gerard Houllier or Steve McClaren when they most needed it, so why are his latest comments completely devoid of any kind of support for the manager he has eulogised as ''the best in the world''? Sticking his nose in during periods of club unrest is nothing new to Gerrard. In 2004, when speculation was mounting that Houllier was set to leave, Gerrard came out with ridiculous comments about how he would leave Liverpool if the French boss was sacked. 'Sticking his nose in during periods of club unrest is nothing new to Gerrard'The club is undergoing another period of unrest and the same thing is happening again, only Gerrard displays no public support for the current Liverpool manager. “It’s important that the players keep their focus,'' he said. ''We realise that there is stuff going on behind the scenes but as a player you have just got to blank that out. As players we get judged on results so it's vital that we don't get distracted from what is going on off the pitch and keep on winning.” First of all, did Gerrard need to focus yet more media attention onto ‘'stuff going on behind the scenes'’?! In fact, did he need to make any comment at all on the situation? What possible purpose do his comments serve? None whatsoever, I would argue. If Gerrard had to speak, he should have said something positive along the lines of: ‘All the players are behind the manager, and we support him 100 per cent’. This is the kind of thing a captain should be saying, is it not? Of course it is, as proved by Gerrard himself recently when he offered positive, emphatic backing for McClaren when speculation was rife about his job: "I'm certainly backing the manager. I've got a lot of faith in him. I've enjoyed working with him and speaking to the other players I'm sure they feel the same.” So why no similar display of support for beleaguered Benitez when there was every opportunity for a show of solidarity? On the eve of a game that could make or break Benitez’s career, a show of support would have done wonders for Rafa’s position. It would also have tallied with the overwhelming support of the worldwide fan base and created a positive symbiosis of support.
Comments (178)
by kieran on November 28, 2007
do i think gerrard is angling for a way out of Anfield? Nope.....you complete cretin
by Jaimie on November 28, 2007
I did not write that - Sportingo did. The crux of my article is not about Gerrard seeking a way out, but should he have supported Benitez in public like he did McClaren and Houllier. If not, why not?
by Lee Booth on November 28, 2007
I've read some of your shocking anti-Gerrard articles before, and you seem to be getting more desperate for mud to sling at him - this time you've sunk to a new low, quite simply A) Gerrard described Rafa as "a World class manager" only a few weeks ago B)The argument isn't about Rafa's ability, it's about a direct argument between Rafa and the owners of the club, why should he get involved - it would be stupid to do so, and further fan the flames of something which has already recieved to much media attention. I applaud our skipper for trying to focus himself and his team on the task at hand, and I suggest that you give up writing on the subject as frankly your coming across a bit wierd
by predictable on November 28, 2007
Am fairly new to this site but whenever I see an article slating Gerrard I know it will be by you. Presumably you enjoy whipping up a bit of controversy but I am afraid that you are just trying to cover up a complete lack of journalistic inspiration - and failing. Judging by the pure fantasy of your article I would suggest turning your hand to fiction though I suspect that would be utter bilge as well.
by jose walker on November 28, 2007
we don,t care about money the ground can go away all we are saying is RAFA must stay
by No on November 28, 2007
Poor, fabircated article once again. You're right your own opinion, which is fine, but with little to no fact or substance. Well done, fool.
If people are getting angry and hurling insults, then I'm glad, because you are *exactly* the type of so-called 'fan' Liverpool FC does not need. I made pertinent points, such as Gerrard's public support for Steven McClaren less than 2 weeks ago. McClaren was in dire straits aswell - his job was under threat and there were massive speculation. Gerrard wasted no time in defending him publicly. Why not Benitez? What exactly is the difference here? Gerrard decided he would reference the issue, but failed to offer public support, yet he supports McClaren. Why?
by Shiggsy on November 28, 2007
Right, your starter for 10. Which of the following is true? a) Stevie expressed his full backing of the manager a couple of weeks ago. b) Stevie is a werewolf. c) Jaimie is a mensa-level football pundit with no prior unexplained resentment of the best midfielder in the Premiership. I'll give you a clue, it's [a]. The other two possible answers are blatant lies, much like the rest of the article. This disagreement is between the manager and the owners, it's nothing to do with the Captain. Gerrard came out with ridiculous comments about how he would leave Liverpool if the French boss {Houllier) was sacked When? What? Why? Can you provide me a link to this please? I don't remember that. If this disagreement did get serious and public statements were made, I'm sure Stevie would have no hesitation in jumping in to support the manager, but at the moment, it's far too covert for that. If he spoke out now, he'd incur the wrath of both Rafa AND the owners and nobody wants that except you, wi
by Skamp on November 28, 2007
To start with Rafa has told the players not to comment and to focus on tonights game,honestly you claim to be a fan and yet on the day of an extra important game you write this tripe. And Stevie never said he would leave Anfield if GH was sacked. And you claim to have read his book
Well - if that was the case, why did he make any reference to the situation at all? The fact that he referred to it three times in his comments negates your point. If he wanted to steer clear of the issue, he could have said nothing. He didn't. He chose to comment. And if he chose to comment, why did he not offer support like he did for McClaren and Houllier when their jobs were under threat? Perhaps if you focused more on the point I was making instead of getting angry and hurling insults you would see there is a legitimate issue to be debated here. I suspect though that you will continue to follow the example of this site's lowest common denominator and join the chorus of insults. As usual, the truh hurts, and the Gerrard fan club would rather get all hot and bothered instead of actually debating the issue in a civil manner! How predictable :-)
by Phill on November 28, 2007
This is mischief making of the highest order & rank poor journalism. Stevie G showed his support for Rafa in the best possible - i.e. a man of the match performance against Newcastle. Disproving a negative is impossible. Stevie did what Rafa should have done & kept his trap firmly shut. The situation will blow over whether we progress in the CL or not. We are a stronger team this year than last & barring further critical injuries we will overhaul Arsenal - unfortunately so will Man U so we may finish second but considerably closer to the top than we have been recently & on track for the title next year
How do you know Rafa told the players not to comment?! This is just supposition on your part. If that was the case, why has Pepe Reina commented on the situation? And Gerrard DID say he would leave Anfield if Houllier was sacked. Find the link to the articles yourself! I'm sure LFC fans out there remember that anyway.
You will notice that Pepe didn't give a single straight answer he simply stated that he was focused on tonights game nothing more. You're a poor excuse of a man pal. This is my last comment on any of your brain farts..
Why would he incur the wrath of the owners? Gerrard did not fear incurring the wrath of the FA when he praised McClaren the other week when he said: "I'm certainly backing the manager. I've got a lot of faith in him. I've enjoyed working with him and speaking to the other players I'm sure they feel the same.” What exactly is the difference between the McClaren/Rafa situation?
by jaimie on November 28, 2007
Please don't go. Your insightful comments and clear ability to debate like an adult will be sorely missed! Given the fact that there is overwhelming support for Rafa from the fans (proven by the online petition and the rally at Anfield tonight) a small measure of support from Gerrard would have been great. He could have just said something like 'All the players are going to give 100% for the manager' or any number of things, but he didn't. Yet when it comes to McClaren, he repeatedly gives strong, emphatic public support. Why not the same for Benitez in his hour of need? And to argue that Gerrard's position would be under threat if he showed support for Rafa is ridiculous. Gerrard arguably has more power than anyone at LFC.
by Adam on November 28, 2007
Did he ignore you once when you asked for his autograph or cut you up at a roundabout? Why this constant diatribe against the captain of the club you supposedly support? You state that "you are *exactly* the type of so-called 'fan' Liverpool FC does not need" in reference to those who comment on your articles when surely this statement applies to you and you only. Write something from an unbiased and informed objective and people may actually take your attempts at journolism seriously.
I don't have to be unbiased. In Sportingo's FAQs they specifically stat they are looking for OPINION PIECES. If people can't hack opinion pieces then why do they bother reading this site? I don't care if people take me seriously - I don't need validation. I know I make good points about LFC, the problem is, I write from a completely different perspective to what most people are used to. The football media doesn't take a critical approach, and so people are conditioned to constant praise and a softly-softly approach, even when it comes to criticism. There are enough people out there writing blind faith praise. There is room for different points of view. Mine is one of them. If people don't like it, tough luck.
by lee Booth on November 28, 2007
when everyone except you expresses the same opinion, it's most likely thats it's not them who's in denial but you - work it out lad are you privvy to Gerrards instructions before he goes into the press conference - NO, so why jump to ridiculous presumptions? and if Liverpool doesn't need anyone as a fan, it's you, you sad sad deluded boy - Admit the truth that your in love with him and don't know how to properly express it ( a bit like how young boys say they hate girls), and i might take your opinion seriously
You have one opinion and one opinion only, that you dislike Gerrard with a passion, I can only assume that you think he was poor against Newcastle too!
There is a difference, the FA are not rich American businessmen, just looking to make a return on their money, a player's comments would not have the potential to rile the FA in the same way it would a foreign investor. Also, if this pathetic media circus continues and a statement is made by Gillett or Hicks which actually states that Rafa is in trouble (at the minute, it's all speculation), Stevie would be first to stand behind his manager. Whether he believes it or not, it is the captain's duty and the last thing he wants is a mass exodus at the club he supports. There is absolutely no point in commenting on speculation as a player, as it is counter-productive, you can quite easily burn your bridges with both the manager and the owners. I note you didn't provide me with the proof of Stevie's threat to walk if Houllier went. That's because it doesn't exist, you filthy liar. Are you a bluenose?
by Billy on November 28, 2007
Rafa has said in his press conference, the same press conference that he asked only to speak about Porto and then the first question as about the rift, he wants the fans to support the team tonight not him. Maybe Rafa has asked the current players not to say anything in the press, he's got enough ex players singing his praises. Stevie can say anything he likes about the England manager, England don't pay his wages. If I went and told the head on the company they were stupid for possibly sack my Line Manager, how long do you think I'd last. Stevie loves LFC and doesn't want to leave so why risk it. Get back in your hole and shut up.
Answer this: Less than 2 weeks ao, Steve McClaren was the focus of intense speculation about his job. The media was full of 'will he be sacked' stories. The day before an important gam - Croatia -Gerrard came out with a STRONG EMPHATIC PUBLIC STATEMENT OF SUPPORT for McClaren. The quote is in the article. Now - Rafa is in *exactly* the same boat, and again, the say before an important game, Gerrard chooses to reference the behind the scenes unrest. However, unlike with McClaren, Gerrard offers NO PUBLIC SUPPORT. Why? What is the difference here? The situations are the SAME, yet Gerrard's behaviour is different. Why? Are you capable of debating that point in a civil manner...?
The situations are nothing remotely similar. McClaren was on his way out since he got the job, there had even been leaked reports from the FA that they were unhappy with him. Not ONE statement has come from Hicks & Gilette pertaining to Rafa's future, it's all speculation, unlike the McLaren situation. Also, as somebody pointed out above, who pays Stevie's wages?