Home > Football > Newcastle's dilemma makes a case for one-season contracts for managers
by Gary Evans on 04 January 2008
Email this Article (4) Comments
Free £25 bet when you register at
Official Merchandise Delivered Direct to Your Door
January's here and every club has a chance to make squad changes to buy themselves out of danger and keep themselves safe. Managers live or die from this month's transfers dealings - providing the club's directors can afford to spend the money required.
Unfortunately, outside the Premier League the gamble of buying to save yourselves cannot guarantee safety. Just ask Leeds United, Manchester City and even Newcastle United fans who have dealt with the fall from grace of their clubs over the last ten years. But the backing of large crowds helps put those coffers in the bank.
The pressure to get it right first time has shown more than ever this season with top clubs changing managers within half the campaign. Jose Mourinho, Chris Hutchings, Billy Davies, Martin Jol, Sam Allardyce, Gary Megson, Steve Bruce, Roy Hodgson, Lawrie Sanchez, Juande Ramos, Sammy Lee and Alex McLeish have all changed clubs. But the extra pressure to bring in the right players and now losing players to the African Cup of Nations could see more bosses out of a job come the end of the season.
Isn't it time that a contract means a contract and that managers and clubs see out these deals? And that if the directors are happy at the start of the season, they should stand by their manager, just as he has to with the players he has?
Clubs take time to adjust to a change of manager plus the backroom staff that are now part of that transfer package. The supporters need to stand firm behind and support their club - and that includes directors, manager and players. We are seeing fans turn too quickly on results, making directors too trigger happy to make changes. Just ask Big Sam or Rafa.
The press and TV pundits don't help the situation by making statements that make fans ask more of the manager. I think a manager should see out the season and maybe contracts should only be one season long. If it will cost Newcastle £50million to let Sam Allardyce go, who wins? The club, who are back to square one, looking for a manager?
Who would want to go to a club that doesn't give you time to make changes? The manager, who will walk away, his ego damaged but with plenty of money in the bank, to sit in as a TV pundit pointing the finger at others? The club directors, who will now realise that they have made mistakes and know the fans will want them out next? Or the fans who pay to watch and want to see a winning team - even though we all know there is only one team that can win the league?
So let's have season-long contracts for managers, with no sackings.
One-season contracts for managers - a good idea or a non-starter? Post your thoughts below or write an article for Sportingo if it grabs you.
Comments (4)
by spaticus on January 05, 2008
Stupid idea. WHy not have G Ramsy come in and call it "Ramsys Manager nightmares". There is no way a manager and i mean any manager can turn a club around in one sesaon. The first few months for a new manager is spent looking at what he has, then to install his ideas to the players and maybe by the end of the year have them playing his way totally. Thats without transfers..in and out.
by Lief on January 05, 2008
I hear all the time that you have to stick with this guy or that guy and for the long term. History shows that more often than not, that works (Arsenal, Man U) but in the same breath it must be stated that those clubs are massive and compared to the likes of Bolton, Newcastle, Wigan, Birmingham City, and Tottenham, they are in a league of their own. Newcastle used to sign young English talent, now Tottenham do that, Bolton and Wigan seem happy to sign retreads, and Birmingham City seem to have finally gone with youth. Success takes time, its not an overnight magic wand waving event. Fans must learn to be realistic, Boards and Owners must also be realistic which none of the above are. You want to win, understand your "roll" in the whole thing, then set out to match that roll and then you can talk about surpassing that. But it must have time. Sam deserves a year or two before anyone starts talking about the axe. Now Sammy Lee was a joke at Bolton, same with Sanchez at Fulham, both are clubs set adrift without
by Gary Evans on January 06, 2008
I would like to see no manager sacked while the season is running and that the minumim contract for any manager would be one season.
by Leaf on January 07, 2008
I can't wait for bullface to be sacked. Sammy Lee may have been a 'joke' but his mistake was to try and get a bunch of cloggers, elbow leaders, and wind-up merchants to pass the ball about on the deck. Sanchez is a different story.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Owen's no gamble - Liverpool's former goal-den boy could be a Manchester United bargain
Galaxies apart: Why David Beckham is NOT the pride of Landon (Landon Donovan, that is)
TEN reasons why South Africa's Peter de Villiers is rugby union's greatest
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.