Home > Football > No excuses, Liverpool - Aston Villa's Reo-Coker and Petrov just ran the show
by www.avfcblog.com on 22 January 2008
Email this Article (46) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
Comments (46)
by trader on January 22, 2008
Ran the show! HAHA. This is hilarious! Villa had 2 shots and scored 2 goals, both from set pieces. Liverpool were awful and still ran the show!
by Rick_evo on January 22, 2008
Ha, you are a joker - what match did you watch last night? Aston Villa didn't turn up at all and if it weren't for one spectacular finish they wouldn't have scored at all. It would be fair to say they didn't even have a half chance until that point. For you to claim that this was a good midfield performance is utter rubbish. Liverpool dominated and treated the game like a training match after they scored - think you need to watch the game again without those 'claret and blue' goggles of yours mate!
by Ennigard on January 22, 2008
Barry is our best player, and he's a really leader.!! We got a draw because liverpool played so poorly to, and if Barry had been in the squad, I think we would have had a bigger chance of getting all 3 points..!! Barry and Villa for life.! :)
by S.Worden on January 22, 2008
Have you been to Specsavers lately? or the home for the deaf and Dumb with a capital D, because I think you need to. That is the biggest pile of rubbish I've ever read and on this site (which looks more and more daily like the ABS HQ) I've read some rubbish about us believe me. Reo Coker and Petrov ran the show? Ahem did you watch the same game as me, they were chasing shadows for all but 15 mins of the second half, got 2 lucky free kicks and profited from us having a card carrying pensioner and a member of the Walking wounded in our defence (left back and left centre back before you ask - you figure out who) That is not to mention the fact that the games commentators slated Petrov repeatedly and then the studio spent 10 mins explaining just why he could NOT cut it in England at the end and as for Reo-Coker, who? I hardly heard him mentioned during the match even when they fluked a lead.
by Mike on January 22, 2008
I'm a villa fan and completely disagree with this article. Liverpool dominated the game and we played awful. We are a lot better than we played yesterday with Barry in the squad.
by Rafa The Gaffer on January 22, 2008
Only if it was a show of bus parking infront of the goal. Villa were awful. Carew was half decent. They were about as threatening as Hamble and Big Ted.
by S Ryan on January 22, 2008
Ran the show Villa were Bloody awful as were Liverpool as for runing the show NRC could pick a pass if he was standing 20 inches from the player he was tring to find Petrov huffed and puffed but came up shot can i ask were u got your amazing post match analysis from coz you are way off the mark
by ChiefVillaNut on January 22, 2008
im a loyal villa fan but before the game i would've been happy with a draw. knowin barry was out i was worried. we came away with a point and scored 2 goals at anfield (doesn't matter how they go in!) for u to say we didn't miss barry is ridiculous!! he is Villa's Stevie Gerrard! Reo-Coker is poor going forward and gets caught in possession, petrov come on leaps and bounds but no match for the likes of gerrard. fair enough liverpool didnt play well but nor did villa. desperatley missed Barry, Petrov and Reo-Coker were poor, if Liverpool had played better we would've got hammered...lets face it, without Barry we have no direction in midfield...it was all chip and chase last nite!!
by The Silver Fox on January 22, 2008
Are you for real? I'm a Villa fan and watched the game on TV getting more and more irate with the midfield in particular. WE COULD NOT HOLD ON TO THE BALL! The passes that went astray from Reo-Coker, Petrov and Mellberg in particular were just too many to count. We got away with murder last night and missed Barry more than anyone.
by Realism Rules on January 22, 2008
Controversial ?? Don't kid yourself - just examine the stats Petrov barely featured, Reo-Coker played well enough but largely in his own half - Mascherano was immense. If you genuinely believe this garbage then you should check yourself in at the nearest psychiatric ward now.
by S Dixon on January 22, 2008
I am also a Villa fan, and also strongly disagree with this article. Barry is our most influential player and was badly missed. We played awful,our passing was dreadful, but to be fair Liverpool wern't much better, which is the reason we ended up coming away with a draw having played so poorly.
by P on January 22, 2008
What a stupid blog! What a waste of time.
by damo on January 22, 2008
so many long balls nrk and sillyarse petrov ( who is just crap)barely touched the ball, so where do you get this apraisal from? Barry made gerrard look ordinary in an ngland shirt and is recognised as one of the best players in the league, so I do wonder what games you have been watching. we need to bin off petrov nd play maloney more. how s the guy never started? he looks quality
by Fe on January 22, 2008
Where do sportingo find these muppets to post these articles?
by Jason Willis on January 22, 2008
Villa never really got going againt Liverpool last night! we were badly missing Barry as there was no one there to play the balls from the centre to pacey wingmen. instead we only had Carew with his flick ons to Gabby and they were no where near effective enough. the only way we were going to score was from a set piece!
by GerryB on January 22, 2008
This site courts controversy to get you to visit...sad isn't it?
by Marcus on January 22, 2008
Villa fan here but I thought Villa were totally outclassed in midfield. Both Petrov and Reo Coker struggled to keep up with the pace and on many occasions failed to hold the ball and make a decent pass. The reason Petrov was moved out to the wing was because he simply hasn't got the strength or stamina to cut it in the middle. Reo Coker got some good tackles in but time and again he simply can't distribute the ball. We missed Barry terribly. Barry is an outlet. He can collect the ball and get it to an attackers feet. This takes the pressure off the defence. However, with Petrov and Reo Coker there was no outlet and the ball kept coming back. Villa were lucky not to be three or four down by the time they scored.
by Smill on January 22, 2008
petrov was universally ridiculed by the TV and newspaper pundits this morning for his non performance - "not good enough for english football" was the consenus if I recall correctly. Barry is villas best player by miles and they badly missed him.
by Up the villa on January 22, 2008
As a loyal villa fan i thought we were atrocious 1st half reo coker won the ball well but was short of ideas going forward, petrov was just clumsy, 2nd half a slight improvement. But i couldnt disagree more about barry, the game was screaming out for barrys creativity and composure. Up the villa
by McGrath for PM on January 22, 2008
Well, I think the comments on here by now should show that you are in the minority of one on your analysis of the game. Let's be honest, we were awful. Personally I thought Liverpool were only slightly less crap than we were which let us back into the game but we should have been dead and buried. We were totally unable to hold on to the ball and at one point were utterly incapable of threading any sort of passing move together. It was painful to watch at times.
by coeur de lion on January 22, 2008
I genuinely hope people dont think all Villa fans's are this daft. We didnt turn up. If we're looking for positives, its that we can go 60mins without playing and still almost snatch the game. That for me shows that we're a real threat even when playing poorly. Barry isnt a central midfielder! Anyone who regularly writes football articles should have some knowledge of the game. Sack him.
by Jason on January 22, 2008
Ok Liverpool were the better team, but they are not the force of old and the fans should recognise this. If Man Utd Chelsea or Arsenal had played us last night we would have lost, no ifs or buts, and if I were a Liverpool fan I would be more concerned about this than arguing who won midfield etc. Win the league? You couldnt beat an off colour Villa!! UTV
by Ron on January 22, 2008
villa scored two goals completely against the run of play. one was a great finish the other a complete and utter fluke. but if you think the aston villa midfiled bossed liverpools u are sadly deluded. i like villa but they were second best for 80 minutes last night
villa scored two goals completely against th