It would be easy to criticise the powers that run the English Premier League for being money-hungry louts (many of them from overseas) with no respect for the sport's traditions and culture. Easy, and probably true on several levels. But that doesn't mean all their ideas lack merit. Take this latest one, about playing games in foreign lands. It's not only logical, but also necessary if the Premier League is going to maintain any legitimate claim as the world's best league. I say bring it on.

I know many football fans like to ignore economic realities or pretend they don't exist, but the truth is these have been the driving force behind organised sport ever since man first tied a piece of cowhide together and gave it a kick. Fact. So the issues affecting global enterprise today (competition from overseas, access to scarce resources, internationalisation of the workplace, to name but a few) can and do impact football and will continue to in the future. One result has been for companies to expand overseas. The Premier League has been doing this ever since its inception, mainly by selling television rights and holding exhibition games. Playing regular season games is the next logical step.

For those of you still crying about how money has ruined sport, consider this: the level of play you enjoy in England is precisely because the the Premier League has embraced these changes. The international success of clubs like Man United and Liverpool is a direct result of formidable globalisation policies, for lack of a better word.

'English clubs have more money to spend on players, coaches and facilities than nearly any others in the world. They are in this position only because of the league's pre-eminence as a global brand.'


So, too, is the entertaining style of play offered by Arsenal since the arrival of their internationally-minded French manager. So, too, is the influx of talent into Chelsea's line-up since their Russian investor entered the fray. So, too, is the highly advanced level of play here, which is arguably better than it is anywhere else. Why is this? Simple: English clubs have more money to spend on players, coaches and facilities than nearly any others in the world. They are in this position only because of the league's pre-eminence as a global brand.

But it's lonely at the top and staying there takes work. The Italian and Spanish leagues are nipping at English heels and the latter in particular has made inroads in Latin America, a growing market that (mostly) shares its language and many of its cultures.

American sports have been holding (real) games outside their home markets for years. They, too, are competition for our Premier League. For that league to maintain its superb quality it needs to take on these challenges.

The alternative? Look what has happened with the French league. A generation ago its teams were expected to contend for continental titles alongside the likes of Real Madrid, Barca, Milan, etc. Today, its best players are at Arsenal. Its best club teams would be hard-pressed to compete for Champions League spots if they were in England and the only reason Lyon are any good is through extremely shrewd management and their own take on globalisation. The rest of Ligue Un would be (with very few exceptions) relegation fodder in the Prem. I don't think this scenario would go over well in Blighty. And for good reason.

So stop fighting and embrace the experience! It will be good for everybody. You'll thank me later.

Would you be happy for your favourite team to play one league match a season on a different continent? Tell us below or in an article for Sportingo.