Home > Football > An Arsenal fan's case for Martin Taylor's defence
An Arsenal fan's case for Martin Taylor's defence
The Birmingham defender has been pilloried for his horror tackle that broke Gunners striker Eduardo da Silva's leg. But this much-publicised incident genuinely was out of character for a defender whose previous behaviour on the field has been almost exclusively within the laws.
by Joe Baker on 24 February 2008
Email this Article (63) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Let me start by saying I am an Arsenal fan. Anyone who has read any of my previous articles for Sportingo will be well aware of that.
I, like every Gunners fan, and indeed any right-minded football fan, wish Eduardo de Silva a speedy recovery following that sickening tackle on Saturday afternoon.
I am in agreement with Arsene Wenger when he said that it’s easy for managers and fans to claim after the event that the culprit “isn’t that type of player”. This is usually used as a catch-all term and tends to mean the complete opposite. However, in Martin Taylor’s case, I think that is indeed the case.
The look on his face when he realised the extent of his mistimed, not malicious, tackle said it all for me. He clearly looked despondent and for me it seemed far more like a challenge that a defender makes for one of two reasons. Firstly, the Birmingham defender was simply startled by the speed of the oncoming attacker, whose quick feet were too much for the defender to comprehend. Hence the mistimed challenge.
Secondly the fact the tackle occurred so early in the game counts for a great deal as it can take a good few minutes for a player to accustom himself to the game and clearly this was partly to blame for the misfortune that befell the Croatian international.
If anyone is unconvinced by any of these arguments, a quick check at the Taylor's previous behaviour on the football pitch should settle their minds. In his previous 74 league appearances the 28-year-old defender had only been booked three times, which is a terrific record for a player in his position on the field.
His only other red card was eight-and-a-half years ago. Again this is hardly the disciplinary record of a persistent offender.
Wenger has stepped back from his original statements which were understandable given the emotional afternoon he had experienced. He is quoted as saying: "I feel that my comments about Martin Taylor were excessive. I said what I did in the heat of the moment. It was a highly emotional afternoon and we were all shocked by the injury."
All those calling for a massive ban for the former Blackburn Rovers man should think first before condemning Taylor. I am sure he is more than aware of the repercussions of the challenge he made and any footballing witch-hunt is both unnecessary and unwanted by this Arsenal fan. Get well soon, Eduardo.
Comments (63)
by Boz Theboz on February 24, 2008
The tackle was late and high. Taylor's leg was stretched and "blocked" meaning the full force of his lunge fell on Eduardo's ankle. Look at the pictures and weep. That is as bad a tackle as I have ever seen. Taylor should be charged by the police and sent to prison for assault. This type of physical brutality has no place in sport. Stop defending the indefensible.
by poor edy on February 24, 2008
There is no defence for what Taylor did to Eduardo. you go tell Eduardo that 'oh it was just an accident dont worry about it' when he is sitting at home watching his team mates playing in the euros this summer. You can say it was a good old fashioned english tackle all you want but I think Taylor should be banned for as long as Eduardo is out.
by Omar Fahnbulleh on February 24, 2008
Joe Baker, I do agree with your point on Matt Taylor, but this is what happens when a manager tells his team to be physical with Arsenal. When an average player tries to cement his place on the team by taking on superior talents things like this happens. I blame the managers, these folks feel the only way to defeat Arsenal is to get as physical as possible.
by Paul Douglas on February 24, 2008
Firstly I would like to pass on my thoughts to Eduardo, his family and close friends and wish him a speedy recovery. I have a few points I feel that I need to make:- The ball previous to the horror tackle was being played on the floor in which case would never warrant any man coming in from a high angle. Listening to sky sports and the BBC defending this man is incredible, there is no defense. I feel the fact the ball was always on the ground has been completely over looked and want to ask the question how can this type of tackle ever be defended. Arsen has since his initial statement on Taylor retracted and is claiming that he said these words in the heat of the moment, WHY? I want to see all the football governing bodies brought together over this and then finally eradicate this from football for life. I think what saves Taylor from a complete ban for life is the fact that he has no history in these types of incidents, however a long ban is warrented!
by Sue H on February 24, 2008
Former Blackburn Rovers man says it all - everyone at The Arsenal knows what they are like. The bloke even had a smirk on his face and the Brum players went to protest when he was sent off. But to put the icing on the cake came the comments from Alex McLeish that Taylor didnt have contact with the player.....Oh I beg to differ!!!
by finestcuts fc on February 24, 2008
Say I'm driving a car, and I mistime my movement and crash into another car? Does that make me incompetetent? Say the people in the other car are injured, should I shrug my shoulders because it wasn't intentional?
by Harry Barracuda on February 24, 2008
You utterly contemptible, stupid prick. How dare you call yourself an Arsenal fan. You are nothing more than a simpering apologist who doesn't know a bad tackle when he sees one.
by John Muz on February 24, 2008
I SAW THE HEADLINE.... AND THEN THE BLOG. IT COULD ONLY BE SPORTINGO!!! YOU BUNCH OF FUCKING RETARDS, KEEP GIVING THESE BLOGGERS NO MONEY TO KEEP AFLOAT YOUR TURD OF A WEBSITE. HAHAHAHA!!!!
by Bolton Wanderer on February 24, 2008
I think that Sky sports played an important role in the way fans felt after the challenge. They should not have denied us the opportunity to view the full incident and form our opinions frame by frame The pictures look very bad, particularly with how far away the ball was The reply shows he was just too slow and beaten by superior skill The images suggest Taylor dived in, the replay showed otherwise I think a three match ban is enough. I'm sure that the Birmingham players own guilt will last much longer than any punishment from the FA Get well soon Eduardo, my thoughts are with you
by conner kerr on February 24, 2008
Taylor made a mistake, it was very miss timed but he should not be made a scapegoat for tackles that most football fans have been concerned about for the last twelve months, he has been punished by the red card and im sure is suffering emotionally as well as the hard time he will receive from most away fans when he plays again.This does however raise the issue of career threatening tackles and the FA doing nothing to prevent the problem.I really hope Eduardo will recover and wear the red and white again but lets not forget we have players that have gone over the top in the past, we are no angels. Football in this country is played at break neck speeds and occasionally we get very bad ACCIDENTS, take a moment and think things through before ruining a players career because you want revenge for an accident, yes its not Eduardo's fault and its a shame but lets try and be balanced, it the same thing had happened last week with Flamini and Nani we would be calling for restraint and understanding for an accident.
by Alan Stuart on February 24, 2008
Sorry, mate but you are wrong. The ball was on the turf, Taylor's studs half way up Eduardo's shin. Prvious good behaviour has nothing to do with it. It was reckless at best and there's a fine line between reckless and malicious.
by David Suazo on February 24, 2008
"Secondly the fact the tackle occurred so early in the game counts for a great deal as it can take a good few minutes for a player to accustom himself to the game and clearly this was partly to blame for the misfortune that befell the Croatian international." Yes, Taylor obviously needed to see how people's legs work first. I think in the first few minutes he would have been confused. He must have saw people moving their left legs; then their right, and seen the process repeated. It's confusing, this walking thing. And then suddenly, LEFT, RIGHT, LEFT, RIGHT they go - faster - something called running. Poor Stuart Taylor. No wonder he made the tackle, he was accustomed to seeing another footballer run at him. That would be alien to any footballer. "f anyone is unconvinced by any of these arguments, a quick check at the Taylor's previous behaviour on the football pitch should settle their minds." Yes, this is true. My next-door neighbour raped his dog and then chopped it into tiny little pieces last week, but he'd never done anything like this before, so he obviously didn't mean to do this.
by Craig on February 24, 2008
What about the Gallas tackle last week? You are such hypocrites!
by Goofle Tom on February 24, 2008
Hiw dare anybody come on a website and say anything other than how much of a disgrace that tackle was? How dare you! His career may well have ended through this challenge. You parade "English grit" you all happy now?! Sky, BBC, Setantam Alam Hansen, Mark Lawro, Andy Gray, Martin Taylor, Garth Crooks etc. You sicken me!
by Miki Pavlov on February 24, 2008
Have you seen the pictures or video in the moment of tackle?. Where is the ball? No ball in Eduardo area. The ball was several yards far from Eduardo when Taylor made the horror tackle. By my opinion he don't want to broke Eduardo leg when he start the tackle, but it's obvious that he was aiming to hurt him more or less and to scary him and other Arsenal players. I vote for hard punishment for Taylor because he deserve that.
by Pat The Gooner on February 24, 2008
Craig you moron, how can you compare a little kick out to that challenge yesterady. you even miss that last weekend 99% of Gooners thought that Gallas should have seen Red. You just compare the 2 incidents
by Ralph Malph on February 24, 2008
Sorry mate but there's no defence. As Wenger said t's like defending a murderer by saying 'He hasn't killed before'.
by adas asd on February 24, 2008
a "mistimed" tackle huh...not with intention...thats what "british grit" is...to hurt someone without intention...thats what the british players only know what to do..."play with steel" and feed crosses in the air...will u say that to dudu in the hospital..."sorry mate, it was unintentional.it was just mistimed"...here is a player who is working the socks off for his team and family...yet u defend a moron from a team which is instructed to play with "steel"...your views are completely deleuded...stick to listening to sky sports and bbc coz thats what u do best....
by Ronald Velden on February 24, 2008
The first point to be made is that there is always risk in sport that you can suffer a serious injury. In some cases they are life threatening as has been the case in rugby. However, the tackle by Taylor was not just reckless but dangerous and it has cost a fellow professional many months of pain and possibly his career. If you drive a car carelessly or dangerously you put yourself at risk of prison. This may be excessive in the case of football, but Taylor should nevertheless suffer a severe penalty with a very long suspension. There is a secondary issue arising from the reportage of the game and that was the total lack of balance and common sense displayed by many of the so called football pundits on BBC and Sky. Many years ago a Managing Director of a leading football club described over lunch that most footballers as having no brain above the waist and sadly that is often confirmed by the pundits who appear on BBC and Sky They criticised the inept performances of Arsenal in the past week and also the attitude of both Wenger and Gallas. Frankly do they believe that Ferguson or Neville would have behaved any better. It shows that they care. The fact is that Arsenal have now been hit by a whole series of incidents.Van Persie has been out for most of the season and now a second of their key strikers is out for the season. Also they suffered injuries to half of their squad and one should not forget that Sagna has lost a brother. If they succeed in winning the League in those circumstances it will show huge character.
by n n on February 24, 2008
by JP F on February 24, 2008
It was a bad tackle, no question, made worse by the horrible injury that followed. I'm sure we all wish Eduardo a quick and complete recovery from it. However for some people to suggest that Taylor should go to prison, is frankly, laughable. It was a bad tackle, punished by a red card, followed by a 3 match ban, and that's it. If either Arsenal player had made contact with Nani last week, he too could have suffered a broken leg, thankfully he didn't, Eduardo wasn't so lucky, but I would suggest that there was less intent to injure from Taylor yesterday, than either of the Arsenal boys last week who wanted to 'do' Nani. So talk of jail and harsher punishments for Taylor are laughable and hypocritical. I'd say more disgraceful was the behavior of Gallas at the end of the game, a poor, embarrasing diplay from a so called captain and leader, what on earth sort of message did it send to the rest of the team when he kicks boardings and starts crying at the end of a game? It's not passion, it's very bad leadership. Anyways, get well soon Eduardo.
by I-can't Beleive-it on February 24, 2008
I can't beleive some of what I'm reading since this incident. I was there yards away from the incident, something most, if not all of you were not. In real time, there wasn't a fan in the ground who even thought it deserved a yellow, it looked that way on replays to, even the commentators said so. He cought him on the ankle, not knee height. Yes, it was clumsy, no more. The images that have ben shown Do not tell the true story, especially the one which is meant to show him smiling, ridiculus, Taylor looked sick himself. I can't beleive some areas of the media, today the NOTW had on the fromt page - Worst Tackle ever, get real, I have seen worse every week , they just haven't had that outcome. For all you Wenger esque red tinted specticled Gooners, just do a few you tube searches and you'll see loads worse tackles from Arsenal over the last few years, luckily they didn't have the same result has this one. Didn't see those I bet. Best wishes to Eduardo.
by anno anno on February 24, 2008
Get a grip Football is a load of nonsence we pay millions of pounds to these man for what entertainment we should spend our time and MONEY on worthy causes you dont see police officers ,fire officers etc belly aching when they get hurt due to someones fault accident or not Footballers have far to much inflouence in this i feel sorry for this guy he must be in agony but for godsake PLEASE ENGLAND GET REAL ITS FOOTBALL its not a case of life and death