How Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool can help the England cause

Thu, Mar 27, 08 09:56
Rank it:
RSS  Digg  del.icio.us
What`s Online:



Peter Crouch: Not enough playing time at Liverpool (Gettyimages.com)

English players need more playing time in the Premier League to improve our standing internationally.

'So we’re left with players like Peter Crouch who are not getting a regular game for their club'

The state of the English game at a national level is awful. We are constantly being told that we have the best team around, but I’m not sure too many fans fall this one any more.

We do have some quality players, there is no doubt, but there is a definite lack of numbers when it comes to certain teams.

We have been told by the media for a number of years that to be considered England class you really should be playing for a so-called top four side. I don’t agree with that but I don’t pick the team.

The problem with this is that the so-called top four – Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool - have very few English players actually turning out for them every week. And those who do play for them are the ones who many people feel should be put under a bit more pressure for their places.

Arsenal have Theo Walcott who plays every now and again. Liverpool have Steven Gerrard who is their only real England regular, Chelsea have Frank Lampard, Joe Cole and Shaun Wright-Phillips who only gets the odd game. So we’re left with players like Peter Crouch who are not getting a regular game for their club.

There used to be a rule in County cricket (not sure if there still is) that you can only play so many non-English players. Now I don’t know how far I would go with this because to me a large majority of non-English players have improved the overall skill level in the Premier League (not withstanding there diving and lack of tackling skills) but I do feel a minimum number of British players should be required, maybe three or four.

This would still allow teams to develop and try and get into the money market that is the European game, but it would also allow English talent to thrive.

One footnote on this. If you want to buy a player now, and you have a limited budget, sadly English players can be out of your league price-wise. Something may have to be done about how much some clubs ask for their up and coming talent.

But then again, maybe if they got more drip-down money from the Premier League they wouldn’t have too ask too much.

What is the answer to the influx of foreign talent and lack of English presence? Post your comments below.
Rank it:
RSS  Digg  del.icio.us
Comments
red man (27/03/2008 12:35)
What is the point you are making all the top four players are england first team players Stevie G fat frank- Terry -Rooney- Ashley-Joe cole, Rio - crouch and Phillips are squad players for both Club and Country- there are no good english kids coming through in the big four thats clear to see.
(27/03/2008 13:22)
man utd started the game with liverpool with.. rooney, giggs, scholes, carrick, ferdinand, brown; and hargreaves on the bench... all british, stop moaning...
Kenny Harper (27/03/2008 13:43)
Rooney plays for England as does Ferdinand and hargreaves but scholes is retired giggs is welsh and brown plays one in ten games halrdy conjusive with helping to bring through English talent is it ? Man Utd was knwon for helping develop English talent once, now its a lot different.
Mark Hunter (27/03/2008 14:12)
Yawn, here we go again. Why should clubs be forced to play sub standard players due to their passport? Years of under investment by the FA in developing young players is more of an issue. Look at the players coming out of Clairefontaine (sp?) what happened to the English version? They messed around for years and have announced funding but how long for the players to start coming through?
simmo M (27/03/2008 15:05)
English football in crisis and its johnny foreigner's fault again! Why is it such a surprise to the tabloid reading fools that follow England's national team? Every tournament that England qualify for they are expected to win even though there are at least five or six better teams in the tournament. The real root of the problem lies with the English mentality. They value players like Terry Butcher and Sturat Pearce over technical able players. I suppose its better to bleed all over your shirt than it is to pass a football properly. In a country where all the top players, managers and coaches are foreign why is it the fault of the clubs? Surely the real problem is the lack of English players playing abroad? Brazil have 75 players in this seasons Champions League. Thats 75 players playing for a top European club. How many English players are at top European clubs outside England? None!! Pitiful isn't it! The moment the English national team are faced with a technically flexible team they come unstuck How can it be the fault of foreigners in the Premiership when England have been pants for decades?
Michael Magnus (27/03/2008 15:26)
Quotas will do nothing to help the English Game. Quotas will result in: 1.A decline in EPL quality which will translate to lower club revenues from overseas fans and organizations. 2. What we will have is more sub standard English players earning bigger salaries. Will that help the game? No. Also, if we relate quotas to English players how does that affect our host of Scottish, Irish and Welsh contributors. Why is it that just about every Footbal Nation including the tiny countries of Jamaica, Trinidad and Honduras have players at the top levels all over the world and England do not? Blame it totally on the FA and their politically appointed Directors who have no clue about the "Beautiful Game" and the lack of infrastructure which has resulted. I dare anyone to name me a major Football nation without a national academy outside of England. The English FA expects clubs to do their job of creating a talent pool, developing technical expertise and junior leagues. Think again, clubs are there to put the best talent on the pitch, win games and create an international fan base so they can reap the financial rewards. Simply put, if we produce world class players like Brazil, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Eastern Europe, Africa, Argentina, etc., they will play for the best teams in the world.
Renju Abraham (27/03/2008 16:02)
The key word here is talent. Talent does not need quota to thrive. It will come out and show itself whatever the situation. The reason there are very few english players in the "big four" is that there are not too many around who can challenge the foreign players for places in the teams. If there were, the clubs would not have needed to go shopping to other countries spending tens of millions of pounds in the process.
Kenny Harper (27/03/2008 18:17)
To be honest I think a couple of you may well have missed the point, how can a quota of players guarnteed a place in a team not help develop British or even English talent ? Currently we have englsih talent being stifled by foreign players some avergae because when a club trys to buy ebglish its too dear, so they go cheaper( Foriegn) itf they have to buy british they will, and that talent will come through.
Jonny Dickins (27/03/2008 21:42)
Very few young english players take the risk of going abroad to develop their game. Many choose to live out thier careers in on the bench for big teams or in the lower leagues, whereas young foreign talent is evergrowing in the Premier League. With the exceptions of Beckham, Owen, Ball, Woodgate and maybe Kazin Richards how many have taken the risk of signing for an overseas team? If you're not breaking into your current team the only option seems to be drop down a division. This is lazy and counterproductive for the English game.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED







*
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team




Adobe Flash Plug-in Needed

This website requires a Adobe Flash plug-in. Please download the latest version of the Flash plug-in by clicking here

Daily Poll

Who will win the Champions League?