Why don’t the Celtic fans love wee Gordon Strachan?

Wed, Mar 26, 08 10:54
Rank it:
RSS  Digg  del.icio.us
What`s Online:


Gordon Strachan: Struggling to win over the fans (gettyimages.com)

Despite two years of great success and improvement, the Hoops boss still doesn't have the full backing of the fans. As a Rangers supporter, I have absolutely no idea why.

'Martin O'Neill is still universally loved by the Celtic support. Yet, whilst he enjoyed considerable success, his record isn't as good as Strachan's'

The second Old Firm game of the season is nearly upon us and, more often than not, these fixtures decide the destination of the Scottish title. There are only three points between the teams and both are enduring a loss of form - well, by Old Firm standards anyway.

After this game the teams still have to play each other twice more so whatever happens on Saturday nothing will be decided. Against this background it is strange that so many Celtic fans seem to have it in for their manager Gordon Strachan.

By anyone’s standards Strachan has been a big success at Celtic. He has won the league title in both his seasons in charge as well as last season's Scottish Cup. More impressively, he has guided his team into the last 16 of the Champions League twice, producing some exceptional results along the way. He has also seen off two Rangers managers in that time and won at Ibrox along the way.

His achievements are made all the more impressive when judged against a period of continued fiscal "down-sizing" at the club and, whilst he still has the biggest transfer budget and wage bill in the Scottish league, it is greatly reduced compared to his predecessor.

So what is the problem? Why aren’t Celtic supporters petitioning for Strachan’s canonisation?

In the mad world of the Old Firm, it seems this just might not be enough for some of his team's fans. Part of the problem seems to be the man himself. Wee Gordon had no affiliation with Celtic before joining them as manager. He never played for them, he didn’t support Celtic as a boy, he isn’t Catholic and has no connection to speak of with Ireland. This puts him at a distinct disadvantage when compared to the man who went before him, Martin O’Neill.

O’Neill was, and still is, universally loved by the Celtic support. Yet, whilst he enjoyed considerable success, his record isn’t as good as Strachan's.

O’Neill spent more money than any Celtic manager in modern times and his style of play, whilst effective, was direct and not pleasing on the eye. Strachan’s Celtic, on the other hand, play a passing game. Where O’Neill favoured physique over technique, Strachan is the opposite.

Despite O’Neill’s millions, he still managed to lose the league twice to Rangers on the last day of the season. And, although he made the UEFA Cup final, he never qualified from the Champions League group stages.

Strachan often comes across as sarcastic, surly and arrogant in the broadcast media but, until recently, had never played the paranoia card so loved by O’Neill and the Celtic support. Celtic fans see themselves as an oppressed minority fighting against unseen powers. Strachan has never indulged this particular fantasy. Perhaps he sees it for the nonsense it is. Either way, it's not what the fans expect.

Lastly, the Celtic support is terrified of Walter Smith, the current Rangers manager. He held an Indian sign over them for the best part of a decade in his previous tenure at Ibrox and has already beaten Celtic three times since returning to the club last January.

Rangers are suddenly making the running both domestically and in Europe and the thought of another decade of Rangers supremacy is scaring the life out of the Celtic die-hards. The irony is that Rangers supporters currently hold the Celtic manager in higher esteem than the Celtic fans do. This weekend will go some way to showing which of them is right.

Are Strachan's days at Celtic numbered? Let us know by commenting below, or submit your own article to Sportingo.
Rank it:
RSS  Digg  del.icio.us
Comments
j1967 1967 (26/03/2008 13:15)
I like WGS and I wouldnt have O Neil back, I think its the media whom love to build things up not the Fans, i've not heard a soul sing Martin O Neil since WGS arrived unlike the chelsea faithful
Tim Malloy (26/03/2008 13:40)
Just dont like the style of football (or lack of it) the guy plays. Catholocism doesnt't come into and never will for any celtic fans, Big Jock being the leading example.
mick sloey (26/03/2008 13:46)
WGS
A lot of the older Celtic fans don't like Strachan because of his antice when he used to play against us. A lot don't like his tactics or the constant playing of Caldwell and McManus despite the fact they're not good enough for Celtic. Add to this the refusal to give Riordan a chance (the best finisher at the club according to WGS) and you'll see where most of it comes from. This nonsense that its about him not being Catholic or Celtic minded is a myth perpetuated by journalists. I dare say there are a few idiots who think like this but to say it's the najority of Celtic fans is a gross exageration
The Evil Genius (26/03/2008 14:17)
O Neill did have a better record than Strachan. I am curious as to how the author feels that Strachan has the better record. The glaring inaccuracies dont end there. This whole article is wrongly centered around the thinly veiled notion that Celtic fans dont like Strachan due to his lack of Celtic minded credentials, which is of course mince. Celtic fans are unhappy at the standard of play, the playing squad and many aspects of the managers personality. We are not the Glasgow team who are intolerant of those we perceive to be not the people. This article is not even a good attempt at proving otherwise.
dox ireland (26/03/2008 14:17)
for me its all about the style of play, its very basic-get it down the wings and get the crosses in. thats about it really. come saturday this tactic wont work because rangers play with 8 defenders and will double up on both wingers and thus stoping the crosses. celtic doesent have an offensive midfielder that can create something out of nothing so it will come down to them pinging long balls into the rangers box, and that'll play right into an average rangers teams hands. back in the nine in a row years celtic always played the best football in the derby but rangers usually ended up winning by catching celtic on the break.
Fr Ted (26/03/2008 15:07)
"Terrified of Walter Smith"? I've heard a lot of nonsense during my umpteen years as a football supporter but the above is so laughable it would make a poker player smile. Congratulations.
Lisbon Lion (26/03/2008 15:36)
When Strachan came to Celtic I was delighted, but within weeks a blind man could see that he didn't know what he was doing. His style of play is so bad and boring that you can have a better night with 5 gallons of VALIUM. THis style of football has helped turn the atmosphere inside Celtic Park like a morgue, it is so bad that I have not bothered going to half the homes games this season. When I see him giving interviews I cringe. He once said that only the views of those in the game matters to him. Well Mr Strachan, between the cost of three season books, the cost of travelling to away Champions league games, preseason friendlies, testimonials etc my three sons and I must spend about £5,000 to £10,000 per year on Celtic and if our opinions don't matter then the sooner you leave Celtic the better. How many times has he said he knows what the problems are and he is going to fix them but still the boring problems go on and on. Last but not least, religion and playing for Aberdeen has nothing to do with it. I'm a protestant who has supported Celtic for 58 years and lots of my protestant family are also season ticket holders at Celtic park. Hail, Hail Lisbon-Lion
Cal glasgow (26/03/2008 15:43)
Um, because the football is rubbish. Half-assed. Half-paced. Our defensive tactics are ludicrous. And Strachan talks nonsense. About pitches, about the weather, most recently about the superior number of passes we make - most of them sideways or backwards. That isn't a recent development. With just a few exceptions it's been like that ever since he joined. Quite why folk keep looking for non-footballing reasons to explain his deep unpopularity is beyond me.
The Author (26/03/2008 20:07)
Thanks for the feedback. I don’t think the majority of Celtic fans have any issue with his non ‘Celtic-minded’ background, but some do. I also think if he did have that background he would get a bit more slack from some of your support as Tommy Burns did for instance, despite not achieving anything like what Strachan has. So I’m sorry but I think some sort of connection or affiliation to the club would make a difference to how he is viewed by some. As for comparisons to O’Neill surely his record is better? He has a 100% record in the league and 2 last 16s in the Champions League, realistically what more could he do? A few of you blame his teams style of play, fair enough, I don’t see enough of them to disagree but surely his style of football is preferable to O’Neill’s? Some of his bigger buys haven’t worked out, yet, but some of his others have been exceptional so it is difficult to find fault there. As for fear of Rangers, well you can’t deny Smith’s superiority first time round but if that doesn’t worry this time then I’ll take your word for it!
Jamie Bell (28/03/2008 13:13)
How can you bring Religion into Football. You are part of the idiots that make 'this intractible problem' intractable.
hector mcgubligan (28/03/2008 15:48)
This is a very poor article. It's utter pish to say the Celtic support don't like/accept Strachan. This crap was planted long ago and unfortunately certain people have not let it go, prob. for their own ends. Move on!
(28/03/2008 15:54)
Dear Author Thanks for the response. O Neill won 7 Trophies in his time. By this stage in his Celtic career (end of third season) he had won 4 trophies and was about to claim another double. Therefore given he won two more trophies than Strachan how can you say he is less successful? The only reason I can think of is that it suits your agenda but i will reserve judgement until you respond
The Author (31/03/2008 15:55)
Jamie Bell - eh? Hector - Fair enough, my mistake. No name - Hasn't Strachan won 4 trophies with Celtic to date (it might only be three) and qualified for the last 16 twice? Even if it is 3 the Champions League last 16 qualification is why I feel his record is stronger.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED







*
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team




Adobe Flash Plug-in Needed

This website requires a Adobe Flash plug-in. Please download the latest version of the Flash plug-in by clicking here

Daily Poll

Who will win the Champions League?