Home > Football > Is £20m too much lucre for record Spurs signing Luka?
Is £20m too much lucre for record Spurs signing Luka?
Luka Modric, the Croatian 'waif', doesn't want to end up like Tottenham's other record signings – Marcus Bent and Sergei Rebrov.
by 101greatgoals.com on 28 April 2008
Email this Article (47) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
Tottenham’s signing of Croatian star Luka Modric has been hailed as a “sensational transfer coup” and a “masterstroke” by the English media. It’s the first major purchase by an English club before the summer transfer window and is sure to be followed by a frenzy of ins and outs in the richest league in the world.According to some sources, the mercurial midfielder has been purchased for a club record fee of £20million, yet if the Croatian is anything like the two previous record signings at the Lane (Sergei Rebrov and Darren Bent), then he will be an almighty flop.After making an appearance in the stands at Saturday’s 1-1 draw with Bolton, the reports claiming that Modric bears more than a passing physical resemblance Johan Cruyff were confirmed. But little else is known about the 22-year-old who, according to the transfer gossip, was also being tracked by Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City, Barcelona, Inter Milan and Bayern Munich.‘Modric has been described as a “waif” ... and question marks are being raised at the size of the transfer fee and whether the Croatian can adapt to the most frenetic league in the world’Spurs boss Juande Ramos and sporting director Damien Comolli have undoubtedly done well to snap up Modric before Euro 2008. One of the unwritten laws of football transfers is that players go up in price dramatically after a successful international tournament. And with Croatia expected to shine in Austria and Switzerland, Modric’s signature may have been even harder to obtain.At 5ft 8in and just over 10 stone, Modric has been described as a “waif” by experts on European football and question marks are being raised at the size of the transfer fee and whether the Croatian can adapt to the most frenetic league in the world.In the tough world of Premier League football, it is no guarantee that such a physically light midfielder can dominate in the centre of midfield. Yossi Benayoun is an example of a midfielder who, despite his obvious quality on the ball and running at defenders, almost always plays on the wing for Liverpool.
Comments (47)
on April 28, 2008 on April 28, 2008
According to my sources. 15.8 million for Modric, that's less than Bent, not the record signing!
by Anders on April 28, 2008
Dont seem to remember spurs signing Marcus Bent?
by Michael Bickley on April 28, 2008
One word comes to mind;BENT.If this is another astronomically expensive mistake by Mr.Levy Spurs ar on the downward slope to eventually ending in the second divsion.
by Dave Annison on April 28, 2008
i thought the fee was 15.8million thats slighty less than 16.5mil get it right
by Sean E-Sean on April 28, 2008
1) It is somewhat previous to describe Darren Bent as an 'Almighty Flop'! A little disappointing, perhaps, but there again I very much doubted he would displace berbs anyway. 8 goals playing mainly as sub is a lot better than some clubs manage for top (striking) scorer! I suspect that you (and your ilk) are driven by the fact that you didn't want DB and considered the fee to be too high in 'choosing' to label him a failure. 2) In regard to Modric - well, yeah, perhaps it is a little high, but, there again, we certainly live in a sellers market at the moment. I, for one, have absolutely no doubt that if the Spurs board refursed to pay such amounts for players that many of the very top clubs wanted, you, for one, would be labelling them 'cheeapskates' and deriding their purchases dismissively as: "another one of COMOLLI'S 'one for tomorrow' then!". A tad sad and very repetitive.
by Chris on April 28, 2008
Utter rubbush story!! Lets wait and see how he does, no doubt he will do well. I still don't think Darren Bent is a flop as he hasn't played much, and hardly had a start. Especially if you have Keano & Berba up front. I don't think the price is steep either. An average player will cost you £7-£10m these days, so £15.8 is very good business, especially as we got there first. If I remember correctly Nani cost Man USA £17m, is he worth that? I don't think so. Is Anderson worth £16m? COYS!!!
by sarah adams on April 28, 2008
1. We signed Darren Dent not Marcus Bent. 2. We payed 15.8m not 20m so we havent payed more then we did for Darren Bent. 3. Chelski, Arsenal,Barca,Real etc all wanted him. If he went to any of these it would be they have done great to buy him. No mention of will he be a flop. So get used to the fact he wanted us over eveyone.
by Ray Kingsland on April 28, 2008
I seem to recall another WAIF spurs signed he did,nt do to badly I thought ? Oh his name was OSSIE remember him anyone ? lol
by spurs babe on April 28, 2008
i think Nani was worth that, i would of loved us to of brought him. He hasnt been played that much but when he does play he is great. same for Anderson. Modric will be the same.
by neilm on April 28, 2008
A big F@ck you to the top four loving media well done to all who where involved in this signing hes a fantastic player and alot of Europes top clubs and I include us in that bracket wanted him but we got him, Magic Juande weaving his magic already. Now, we need to give JR as much cash as possible to continue building and soon before the Euros inflate everything. Berba and your agent go bang each other somewhere ( 40 million ) 15 million the other rejects , give all the money to JR and no doubt about it he will build us a team to be reckoned with. COYS
by CHRIS on April 28, 2008
Modric playing next to Huddlestone should be a great double act. The best since LAUREL and HARDY.... COYRRR
Bent really isnt a flop at all, he hasnt had any games in a row, just like modric wont be a flpo and he will have something bent will never have, more first team action
Bent really isnt a flop at all, he hasnt had any games in a row, just like modric wont be a flop and he will have something bent will never have, more first team action
by Sportingo Is-Shit on April 28, 2008
sportingo how do u stay up and running? you have got to be the worst football info site going! seriously, do u just take laptops to schools and ask kids to do reports for u in their lunch breaks? i bet none of u have any kind of journalism degrees do u? please just shut the site down so we dont keep accidently clicking on u on newsnow!
Spurs babe, Nani is not a team player, great skills but how many times do you see him pass when theres a great opening for the team?
by Yidarmy on April 28, 2008
Have you ever even seen this lad play? He's a world class player in the making, it's a masterstroke by Spurs because this boy is absoloutly top quality and exactly what we need.
Bent cost what 16 million and gets payed 95,000 pound a week out of your season ticket money and you don't think he's a flop. Thats why your in the bottom half of the table low expectations, no ambition...
Not sure if Bent get paid £95k a week. Spurs have a restriction on wages. I highest earners are King, Keane & Woodgate at around £60k a week. Bet the person that wrote that quote, wished they had D Bent in their attack. Low expectations yet we still Won the first trophy of the season, although we have had a very bad season. Me thinks the person supports West Spam. is because Daz Bent didnt wanna sign for them...
by mogspur on April 28, 2008
Slice of lemon anyone? this guy is some player, what an awesome signing, well done spurs, hard lines everyone else. Cant wait to see this guy play, Yeeeeeeeessssssss!
94,669 pounds per week ninteenth highest paid player in the world, It's all over the web, no other spurs player in the top 50.....
Just seen that list, its utter bollox, it also states that Torres is the highest earner at Liverpool, higher than Gerrard, I think not. No way Bent is on that much, he would be lucky to be on half that salary
Gerrard is only on 4,000 pounds a week less than Torres and he negotiated his contract a couple of years ago when Chelsea were chasing him.
Gerrard is the highest earner at liverpool. I remember LIverpool had to break there wage structure to sign him to a new contract. Sol Campbell is never on that much at Pompey. The highest earner there is Lassana Diarrwa on 65000 pounds a week... and everyone at the club there is in up roar because of it...
by Ad Sincs on April 28, 2008
95k a week.... hahahahahahahahahaha! Oh its on a website so it must be true! Unbelievable comment! 99% of stuff on the internet is utter rubbish mate... about time you realised that!! Everyone knows that Spurs have a strict wage structure and i can tell you know if anyone at the club was going to be paid that money it would be Bent! COYS!