Home > Football > Villa and Torres the goal-den dream ticket at Liverpool? Only if they sacrifice Gerrard!
by Jaimie Kanwar on 17 June 2008
Email this Article (24) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
Liverpool are apparently waiting in the wings to snap up Spanish striker David Villa and, whilst capturing the Spanish maestro would be a dream acquisition, the Steven Gerrard conundrum means that signing any top-quality striker right now would be a recipe for disaster.
Villa himself seems positive about the idea of coming to Liverpool and clearly relishes the prospect of teaming up with Fernando Torres. Alas, as great a signing this would be for Liverpool, with Gerrard at the club, it will never work - and I will explain why.
Quite simply, Liverpool are incapable of playing 4-4-2 successfully with Gerrard in the centre. Everybody is always going on about how Gerrard’s best position is central midfield, but if that’s the case, why does he not play there for Liverpool or England?
The answer is simple: Gerrard has proved that he cannot form a *consistently* successful midfield partnership with anyone - for club or for country. Whether it’s Xabi Alonso, Javier Mascherano, Momo Sissoko, Lucas Leiva or Frank Lampard, Gerrard just does not function successfully in a midfield two.
The main reasons for this are his positional indiscipline and hero complex. Simply put, Gerrard always wants to do everything himself, which means he abandons his position on a frustratingly regular basis, leaving holes for others to exploit.
As a result of this, the Liverpool team has been chopped and changed in every conceivable way over the years in an attempt to accommodate Gerrard; the 4-2-3-1 formation that Liverpool currently employ is the only formation that suits him.
What about playing on the right? That’s a no-go too as Gerrard has made it quite clear that he doesn’t want to play out there, even though it would probably be the best thing for the team. So we’re left with his current position - playing behind the striker. In Liverpool’s current system, this is the only place Gerrard can play, and for him to be successful, he needs two midfielders doing all the donkey work for him.
And therein lies the problem: The whole team is set up to get the best out of Gerrard, which means that if Liverpool buy another top-quality striker and accommodate him regularly, the formation would need to switch to 4-4-2. This means we’re back at square one again, i.e. trying to fit Gerrard in somewhere that not only benefits the team but satisfies his ego.
If Liverpool were to sign Villa - or a striker of comparable quality - such a player is not going be happy sitting on the bench waiting for Peter Crouch-like cameo roles. A player like Villa needs to play regularly and should play regularly, otherwise what’s the point of spending all the money?
Furthermore, Torres is not going to be happy sitting on the bench regularly to accommodate someone else, and Liverpool fans wouldn’t stand for that anyway, so what is the solution? Unfortunately, the solution is that Liverpool cannot and should not buy another Torres-quality striker whilst Gerrard is at the club. Of course, none of this would be an issue if Gerrard could successfully function in a midfield two, but that truth is he cannot.
If Liverpool's current formation is the template for the future, then buying another top-class striker would just create unfair competition for places up front. And, as we’ve seen over the last year, intense competition for places causes friction and recrimination. For example, in midfield, we had a ridiculous situation where five players were competing for two first-team slots.
This unfair competition forced out Sissoko and caused Alonso to seriously consider his future. The same goes for the striking roles. With Rafa favouring one up front, Dirk Kuyt was converted into a right midfielder and Crouch was stuck on the bench for most of the season.
If someone like Villa was to sign, and Liverpool continued to play with one up front, it would be a recipe for disaster. Somewhere along the line, either Villa or Torres would become dissatisfied with warming the bench. Alternatively, Rafa could try to accommodate both strikers by playing 4-4-2 or 4-3-3, but this would cause the team to become unbalanced again for the reasons I’ve already outlined.
As long as Gerrard is at the club, Rafa should stick with the 4-2-3-1 formation and spend any transfer funds on creative right and left wingers/midfielders and pacy, creative full-backs.
Of course, there is a third option: Sell Gerrard and buy a midfielder who can function successfully as part of a midfield two. Cue mass hysteria and Liverpool fans collectively foaming at the mouth!
To read the full article, please visit: http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2008/04/why-steven-gerrard-is-reason-liverpool.html
Comments (24)
by Chris Evans on June 17, 2008
He had a good partnership with Hamann years ago, I think that he would be more disciplined if Rafa told him to be. Besides, I would definately be happy with this side: Torres Villa (Babel) Gerrard Barry Mascherano Alonso Dossena Agger Skrtel (whoever) Reina Anyway, considering we have about 50p its all academical.
by steve on June 17, 2008
You are simply talking out of your posterior. He's a class player who has played well in many positions....even left sided for England. Sto talking nonesense.
by KRFVILLA on June 17, 2008
Strange article. Gerrard does play very well in a 4-4-2 with one player, Gareth Barry, that is why Rafa Beneathus wants to sign him! Liverpool would have a great team with Barry and Gerrard in centre midfield and Torres and Villa up front with Milner, Bentley or someone useful on the right. The only problem is MONEY, and I don't think Liverpool have enough to buy Barry and Villa plus a quality right sided player. One big transfer by one club will I think set off a number of very interesting deals this summer, but Liverpool have serious cash problems compared to the other 'top three' and the chasing pack behind them. O'neill won't budge on the Barry fee because he doesn't have to. He has enough funds with or without that £18m
by Ellis on June 17, 2008
I disagree, Gerrard can play in a midfield pair. Through most of his Liverpool career he has played in a 4-4-2 and with some degree of success, Champions League Winner, Uefa Cup winner, Fa Cup winner, League Cup winner, Super Cup winner. Its only in recent months that Rafa has opted for the 4-2-3-1 formation, not to accomodate Gerrard but beacuse he wasn't satisfied with the strikers that he had to choose from. Gerrard, Torres and Villa would be a force to take Liverpool to the top, guaranteed!
by Maple Leaf on June 17, 2008
The answer is: 3 central defenders (Carragher, Skrtel, Agger) 2 overlapping wing backs (Dossena, Degen) 2 central midfielders (Barry, Mascherano) 1 attacking midfielder (Gerrard) 2 strikers (Torres, Villa)
by YNWA YNWA on June 17, 2008
JK.....are you sure that you ARE a Liverpool supporter and, not a Bluey??????
by Liver Paul on June 17, 2008
Thank you for finally finding someone with a fair comment! I think JK is on something that I don´t dare try!!!
by Flabbergasted on June 17, 2008
I got as far as this statement "The main reasons for this are his positional indiscipline and hero complex." You will never be a journalist Mr Kanwar i would be looking for another career if i were you!
My comment was to Maple Leaf, by the way!
by mup pet on June 17, 2008
4-3-3 would be the ideal formation if we capture Villa. Reina Dossena,Carra,Agger/Skrtel,Arbeloa, Gerrard,Masch,Barry Villa,Torres,Babel/new winger.
by A Stevens on June 17, 2008
Liverpool don't need a right-sided midfielder - we have Babel (and Kuyt's looking tidy there at the moment) What we need are marauding full-backs and a left winger now we've got shot of sicknote Kewell. With Gerrard and Barry in themiddle, plenty of roo to accomodate Villa. I can see it now - "Barry to Villa" GOAL!! That should make O'Neill spin!!!
by A B on June 17, 2008
Unfortunately, this article shows the journalist's true colours in a rather embarassing attack on Stevie G. I suppose it is Gerrard's fault that Liverpool didn't win the league last year? And if it wasn't for Gerrard, the Americans would never have taken over at Anfield, Britain wouldn't have invaded Iraq, and Snickers would still be called Marathon. 'Hero complex' and 'can't play with other midfielders?' Grow up. Honestly.
by Eric Lau on June 17, 2008
Gerrard is a class player and he can play well in any form or position. Why Benitez played 4-2-3-1 in the final period of last season? Because we've no other good attacker to partner Torres. Therefore, if we have Villa in the front to partner Torres, Benitez will no doubt to swap back to 4-4-2, with Marscheano/Barry being the player in front of back four & Gerrard upfront supporting Villa & Torres.
by Keith Davison on June 17, 2008
Babbel is left sided or attack not right sided so i dissagree we need right side over left.
by Ryan G on June 17, 2008
JK, YOU KNOW NOTHING, AND YOUR ARTICLE SUCKS !!!!!!
by Silly Villains on June 17, 2008
Not sure about the Rafa Beneathus comment coming from a Villain. Surely you would have to be above Liverpool to make such a comment? Silly boy, you'll be waiting a long time!!! AHhahahahahahaha
by Steve C on June 17, 2008
... read such a load of crap in my life. First of all, Gerrard can and will play anywhere and will always play his heart out for Liverpool. And secondly, the acquisition of a second striker to play alongside Torres does not mean Benitez will have to switch to a 4-4-2 formation. 4-3-1-2 would be the way to go for me, with Gerrard playing a free role just behind the strikers and Kuyt, Mascherano and Babel filling the midfield.
by Ged on June 17, 2008
If Barry is brought in as a left midfielder then babel can be a right winger and Stevie will be fine as part of a centre 2 We'll never play with 2 out and out wingers, one will always be a wide midfielder with a remit to come inside to stiffen up the middle and barry suits that role perfectly, this would enable gerrad to fly forward with cover behind him and also allow us to play a 4-4-2
by elninoT9 on June 17, 2008
i think gerrard has been successful in a midfield pair. some1 mentioned hamman but more recently gerrard has been successful with gareth barry!! maybe rafa took this into consideration wen he decided to bid for the versatile midfielder!!! altho the papers wudn be smart enough to think of those possibilities
by ross gidman on June 17, 2008
whai just dont get this article it's ridiculous 1 who says if we sign villa we have play 4 4 2 he could play the kuyt role in 4 2 3 1 no problem he plays in deep position anyhow he's played down wing in his past his pace movement and work rate would suit that position 2 why does stevie have play center midfield in 4 4 2 prob his best season for liverpool was the 2005 season when he played most of season on right wing or in free role with 2 other center mids. 3 stevie also has no prob playing in center mid with people only frank lampard who lets face it is greedy over rated and should never put on an england shirt again after his performance in world cup
by Tez Mc on June 17, 2008
No player is bigger than the club. Gerrard will play where he is told (preferably on the right). No team in the world would reject Villa to keep another player happy. That's absolute madness.
by Jonah on June 17, 2008
Pity that Liverpool are broke isn't it?
by john smith on June 18, 2008
just play 4-1-2-1-2 with mascherano in DFM and gerrard AMF and babel on wing with sum1 else (possibly barry or bentley) and have villa and torres upfront together :)
by Dion on June 18, 2008
If Liverpool are going to win the premier league, they shouldn't reject a quality player such as David Villa. He can team up very well with Torres up front, with Gerrard playing behind the 2 strikers ,and Macherano & Barry sitting behind Gerrard. That will form a perfect attacking formation which is absolutely deadly!
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email