Home > Football > The menace of mediocrity: Arsenal's boss has it so right about the international game
by basem adi on 28 June 2008
Email this Article (3) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
If Turkey had had a near fully fit team (and minus the suspensions), as the Germans did, they could have possibly reached the Euro 2008 final. Had he not been suspended, Volkan Demirel would have prevented at least one of the three German goals. While Turkey dominated much of the game, it never seemed that they could win; their defence and goalkeeper were unbelievably poor and the Germans seemed far more menacing in their attacks and set pieces.
Germany are a good team, if nothing special. At times they are average and slow. And with the exception of one match (against Portugal) they were entirely predictable.
As expected their main threat was aerial, as was demonstrated against Portugal and Turkey, which makes them difficult to defend against without a steady goalkeeper. Then there is the attacking threat of both Lukas Podolski and Bastian Schweinsteiger, who have a very good understanding on the left, coupled with Philipp Lahm as an excellent attacking left-back, providing Germany’s main threat against both Portugal and Turkey.
I have recently been contemplating the words of Arsene Wenger that international football is really not up to standard (club football is far superior, but certainly not fairer). Let me quote the man:
‘’I’m not a big fan of international football because they destroyed it. Take Russia: once it was one country and now it’s 21. Yugoslavia was one and now is six. As a result the level has dropped. Then you add countries like Andorra, Faroe Islands and San Marino and suddenly three games out of four are of no interest. When you think of international football you think that it’s a level up but 99 percent of the time it’s a level down. That’s why I prefer club football.’’
Watching the defensive displays in Euro 2008, he does have a point. Then there is the tournament draw, where eventual champions could be crowned for playing, at most, a third of the teams in the tournament.
For example, had this German team been drawn in Holland’s group, they would not have made it past the group stages. Also consider that teams are measured upon a handful of matches; if luck (as was the case with Germany and Turkey) should conspire in your favour, you may well find your way through to the later stages.
Imagine if a team like Manchester City were crowned champions of England after their good start last season. With the diluting of standards in international football and the absence of a league system to measure teams over a longer period, then we have to question if international football is indeed about standards or simply a mass frenzy for corporations and marketing.
The worse case scenario is that UEFA are contemplating tinkering with this European championships format, further expanding it to 24 teams. As with the World Cup, this not only dilutes standards, but questions the whole purpose of tournaments as a suitable means for crowning the best teams. With more teams, a lucky draw could mean the eventual winners may not play a top-ranked team until the final (as was the case with Germany in the 2002 World Cup).
This leads to a final point - couldn’t the long and gruelling qualification campaigns, followed by a month-long tournament, be replaced with a league system of international teams? Such a system would be vastly fairer in identifying the stronger teams and the eventual winners would at least have played a wider pool of stronger teams.
Prior to 1980 only four teams competed in the championships, after a play-off qualification. A similar system could be put in place, with the top four teams in a league system qualifying to play each other for the trophy. Better still, the team that amass the most points deserve to be crowned outright (it also ensures the absence of penalties).
This may not have the excitement of tournament football but it is a vastly fairer system, where teams like Germany and Turkey would probably fall short over a longer string of matches.
But as long as international football remains as it is, then in terms of football, in its purest form, international football does not have that much to offer.
Comments (3)
by sharky khan on June 28, 2008
nice one couldve made bit shorter so people would read it
by loki on June 28, 2008
I understand exactly what your saying but in all honestly the little drama's that make up the tournament based competition is normally the most intense and exiting thing about international football the fact that one bad game and your out keeps you on the edge of your seat. YES it would be fairer to put in place a league system and YES it would be a much better method of deciphering which nation is superior to the rest but really I think it would just take a lot of fun out of the game.
on June 30, 2008 on June 30, 2008
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
England must scrape the bottom and turn to Spurs for wide-left salvation
Spurs go one better than Barcelona in Krakow – now bring on Hull City!
Ouch! The TOP TEN freak sports injuries
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.