Home > Football > Spurs to gatecrash Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool? Don't waste your money
by Philip Smith on 01 August 2008
Email this Article (23) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
It’s that time of year when a young man’s fancy turns to... errr... two or three pints and a tikka masala after the match!Yes, we’re on countdown to the start of a new season. You can almost hear the adrenalin starting to churn. Just think of it, a few days to go and it all starts again - yellow cards, red cards, punch-ups (on and off the field), arguments, moments of magic and anguish, delirium and despair. Can’t wait!
Spurs fans have been drawn out of hibernation early by the sound of Daniel Levy preparing to break the bank in an ambitious recruitment campaign. David Bentley has already been signed from Blackburn – that’s the Robbie Keane money from Liverpool taken care of – and Levy is now reported to be romancing Russia’s top two players in the Euro 2008 tournament.
Zenit St Petersburg’s Andrei Arshavin and Spartak Moscow’s Roman Pavlyuchenko are next on the list at a combined cost in the region of £40m. Seems they hit it off together and it is thought that they might travel and settle in London better as a pair - which is good thinking on Tottenham’s part considering the abysmal time Andrei Shevchenko has had at Chelsea over the last season or two.
That takes Juande Ramos’s spending to more that £100m since his arrival from Sevilla less than a year ago, but he’s not the only big spender.
Everton, Aston Villa, Blackburn, Portsmouth and Manchester City have all been busy in the market, all in the search of one important goal. And that is breaking into the Premier League’s top four, where the BIG prizes are stored.
But I’ve got news for all of them. The Big Four – Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool – are WIDENING the gap between themselves and the rest. It’s going to take a monumental effort by any one club to unseat one of them.
Over the past 16 seasons the gap between the fourth and fifth clubs has generally been no more than three or four points, But the season before last a startling eight points separated Arsenal in fourth from Spurs in fifth - and last season the gap widened to 11 points between Liverpool and Everton.
Villa were 16 points adrift, Blackburn 18, Portsmouth 19, Manchester City 21 and Spurs a staggering 30 points off the pace.
To make up that enormous leeway, Spurs will need to win at least 10 games more than they achieved last season. Will they be able to do it, even with an England fringe player and a couple of Russians on board? That’s a tough call in my opinion.
I don’t know whether I’m right in this estimation, but I always get the impression that Spurs fans would be happy to escape relegation by one point if only they could manage to trash their bitter rivals Arsenal just once during the season. Perhaps it’s time to put aside the local prejudices and re-focus the attack elsewhere.
I can’t see Everton making much of a move this season, Villa are trying desperately to hold on to their one genuine class act in Gareth Barry, Manchester City have signed a man called Jo and Mark Hughes will undoubtedly add more newcomers, and Portsmouth have done their usual transfer tinkering.
Spurs are the club who have made the bold moves. But will it be enough to mount a serious challenge to the Big Four this time around? Will it be a season of revolution or roulette?
I can’t help feeling that it might take at least another season to recover from the loss of Keane and (possibly) Dimitar Berbatov before Spurs are up to full speed. In the meantime, don’t invest too much or your cash on them becoming a member of the Big Four elite just yet.
Comments (23)
by Neal Brown on August 01, 2008
Spurs consistantly spend bucket-loads of cash and recoup little. It's surely unsustainable. A small stadium can't help. Surely the credit crunch will hit them almost as badly as Man U and Liverpool?
by Steven P on August 01, 2008
Last year there was a table posted showing how the Premier league compared on wages as a percentage of income. Spurs had the lowest percentage of about 42%, the average was 60-70% with some teams around 80%. I can't remember who was highest but seem to recall Newcastle was up there. I hope this explains how Spurs can consistantly invest heavily in players and still churn a profit (remember they are a PLC, their results get published and they do make a profit each year.)
by spurfect one on August 01, 2008
NEAL BROWN yeah the credit crunch might hit us but the difference is we are not in debt.
by Adam Ellena on August 01, 2008
Spurs for the last few years have been a selling club, your forget this season alone we are in profit and one of the richest clubs in europe. Keane £20m - Bentley £15 = £5m, Tainio, Malbranque and Chimbonda £13m - gives us £18m profit. Modric £16m = £2m profit. Robbo £3.5m to blackburn. = £5.5m, Dos Santos £4.6m = £900k profit, without the loan fees we have had come in. Kabul £5m will go, berbatov £25m ish will leave us around £31m to spend so if we pay £15m for Arshavin and another £15 for Pavlyuchenko. And we have broken even, at most we will be a couple of mil in or out of pocket. We could go back further to Carrick etc. We lost £11m on Rebrov about 10 years ago so maybe thats what he meant.
by Irish Spurs on August 01, 2008
difference is Spurs are not mortgaged to the hilt like Liverpool whos co-owners borrowed funds to buy them, Arsenal have been hit with large interest repayments on their ground, and with credit crunch can not sell apartments built on Highbury, Utd not as bad off as you think could still spend big if get chance.
by Sean Ysean on August 01, 2008
Your thought has many errors. I am not one who is certain Spurs can break this cartel - nor is even too obsessed by it this season. I believe 5th and another trophy would be sufficient. But, you are massively misled if you believe Spurs recruitment can be described as 'an England fringe player and a couple of Russians' (assuming the couple of Russians actually come). You have to take into account the quality of juande Ramos. This guy is so well thought of that it was seen as only a matter of time before Real madrid or barcelona came calling to Sevilla. hence it was seen as something of a coup (if handled badly) that he should join Spurs. He builds a team (i.e. he doesn't go down the galacticos route), and has a preferred, very progressive style of play. he has systematically been building a team to perform in that style - 4-5-1. He is also very adventurous when making substitutions when chasing games. And he insists that his team is fit fit fit, in order to cut out late goals conceded - the Spurs major achilles heel last season. Bentley is perfect for this; as are Luka Modric and Dos Santos, who you refrain from mentioning (why). p.s. Spurs do have a relatively small stadium, for such a big club, but it has the highest percentage of executive boxes of any Prem. ground, meaning that match revenues are higher than would be expected, based on capacity.
by J Blindside on August 01, 2008
Seems we are back to the same few weeks before last year's season kicked off - namely Spurs are going to be outstanding yet again ! Press-lauded last year and fan-louded this let us hope they can manage to squeeze into the top half of the table . As for top four ........... ciao jb
by Jack the Spur on August 01, 2008
In a business sense, Spurs are the best team in the world by miles
by John D Red on August 01, 2008
Good news. Spurs can enter the Champions League of European Finance and you MAY win something! I think the real football clubs will just stick to winning the Champions League of Football and let you guys run your finances really well
by SimonA on August 01, 2008
Check your facts matey, Spurs have huge borrowing. It's no good looking at this season in isolation. Over the last 5 years they are arond 150 million down, and mostly borrowed, hence big payments. If you look at the books, the concern is that Spurs will become the next Leeds. The big 4 (3 really as Liverpool are not financially big) have either 10 years Champions League money or an Abramovich. They also have colossal gate receipts. Arsenal have the highest gate take per match in the world and will this year become the richest club. ManU have serious backers and enormous gates of £75,000. The problem for Spurs is that because they have wasted money on poor players they cannot afford a new ground. Arsenal will be out of the new ground debt in 4 years and Spurs will never catch them or Man U or Chelsea. Liverpool, maybe, but they have a better team and a better coach. Tough luck...
by Carloz Goonasaurus on August 01, 2008
We all know that spuds fans the most deluded of all .. and this shows up in everything they think and say .. so, you reckon that all the money your directors are loaning the club in all these purchases are actually free ... then u are thicker than we all used to think. Arsenal is not poor by anyone's standards (we just have a debt of £280m which will soon drastically reduce), we about 3rd in europe in generating income .. we are just a well-run club which believes in minimising our expenses when we have no need to make them. We create/build teams and stars instead of buying ready-made stars ... In fact, arsenal is the very best run/managed team in the world. So, each time spuds fans says arsenal is skint, gooners general chuckle at their idiocy ... the spuds are just good for laffs, and not for taking seriously. So, you purchased modric, dos santos, and bendtley .. and now you are the best team in the EPL .. its the silly season all over again .. dont you tossers ever learn: wait first for your team to do something b4 u start boasting and gloating.
by simon davies on August 01, 2008
I have been impressed with JR as an astute tactician, and now as a wheeler dealer.He has bought very well indeed,Capel is the one no one is mentioning .In my opinion he made the best performance of player visiting the Emirates last season.Put your money on a Top four finish .(Liverpool out)
by name on August 01, 2008
Well there's a surprise Sportingo wants the game to die a slow death as Man U/Chelsea/Arsenal/Liverpool dominate EVERY BLOODY SEASON Hang Your Heads in Shame!
by David Quimola on August 01, 2008
As every spurs fan knows (much to the detriment of their blood pressure), spurs ended up drawing or losing games, despite taking the lead last season. In fact, the total number of points dropped from a winning position was 33. This would have been more than enough to gain 4th place! Perhaps JR will have changed the mentality of the players, and with a few key signings and hopefully an improved defense (woodgate king hutton bale), not to mention a new keeper, we might be able to close the gap this time around?
by Paul W on August 01, 2008
Simon A - I suggest you check you facts. I'm a Spurs shareholder - trust me when I say they are not up to their neck in borrowing. If you want to big up the big 4, along with every member of the press, I suggest you do it without talking about what you dont know.
by Steve G on August 02, 2008
Carloz Goonersaurus - Im not a prticularly big fan of Spurs myself, but if you dont take them seriously, why did you write so much about their team? As for Arsenal, I agree you are well run and managed and your dealings in the transfer market are a credit to your manager, but what happens when Wenger goes? There isnt a manager out there that plucks and nurtires takent like Wenger and if you are still unable to splash the cash when he eventually leaves, I wonder what Arsenal would do? All if and buts, but ones that I would be concerned about - especially in a leaugue that seems to be spending more cash on young raw talent every year.
by Steve S on August 02, 2008
neal brown look at the facts this year we have spent 43 mil so far and re couped 39 mil so you comment is not only stupid but also untue, please thimk in future mate.
by Joel Cairo on August 03, 2008
Modric and Bentley clearly help Spurs in mid-field. Its too soon to say if the front line will end up stronger or weaker. My question is: what are you doing on defense, JR? Replacing Tubbo is positive, but it is only when the Two Gimps play that Spurs can be strong. So JR can play King and Wingate in cups, and you'll do well, but they won't be available consistently in the league. King and Wingate are 20-games a year men, and you will play 50 or more. Spurs can probably achieve a positive GD of 10-15 this year, which is UEFA territory, but not top 4.
by Ger Mc on August 04, 2008
All spurs fans talk about the forthcoming season as being "THE" season where we break the top four, and im no different. Im retrospect though, this year is different to any other. This summer we havent signed any no-bodys, we've signed either proven players eg gomes, bentley or players of big potential rg Gio, Modric. Couple those with having actual decent full backs for the first time in 10 yrs, a pacey attacking midfield and all that remains to be seen is if we sign a quality striker or stick with lazy but quality berbatov & Bent, who i think everyone can agree wasnt given the opportunity last year to show us what he has done in preseason. 9 goals in a week? U cant argue with that, even though its pre-season who else has managed a feat like tht this summer?
by Darren Dawson on August 04, 2008
Well thanks Phillip!! so shall I not bother looking forward to the season? seems as its all a loss before a ball is even kicked, so not only do we have no chance of getting in the top four but it seems we are not even in the running! WOW! so in your opinion how many more players do we need to sign? because we have added Dos Santos, Gomes, Modric, Bentley possibly Arshavin!! where as Villa, Everton, Arsenal have hardly been big spenders so why cant we challange in your opinion?? Im sorry but you might as well stick to leaving anti-Spurs comments rather then articles because you make yourself look stupid, I appriciate that your a loyal Arsenal fan but SERIOUSLY! Gomes - Hutton - King - Woodgate - Bale - Dos Santos - Modric - Arshavin - Berbatov - Bent - Jenas Im sorry but if that team wont be challanging then my names not Darren!! I tell you what Phillip I CHALLANGE YOU TO WRITE A PRO SPURS ARTICLE!! i BLOODY CHALLANGE YOU TO IT!! OR WILL HELL FREEZE OVER 1ST????
by Essexian76 on August 04, 2008
Tottenham should be held up as an example of a great football club, constantly getting full houses, despite lack a of success, also despite having two of our biggest city rivals, winning trophies (well until recently they did),on top of being one of the most expensive to watch. But from those above us, we're a team of wannabe's and from those below, we're a pushy bunch of upstarts. Sorry to dissappoint, but we a merely an ambitious club, who are well run, well financed and want to be up there challenging for honours, those above should worry and fans of those below should be asking why arent their board and managment emulating us and showing the same ambition as we are!
by Naz Yacoob on August 04, 2008
Hey Phillip Smith, I hope you are not getting paid for writing such bolony(spelling not sure of). First I think you should change your name because it sounds too much like an impostor. Since you are an Arsole supporter,(sorry it's my bad spelling again), you should not be making any predictions about anything relating to football. What has your team won in the last three years. Nothing. We thrashed you last season and it could/should have been 9-2. We won a trophy and you - bugger all. So shut it and watch this space for the coming season. I am a betting man and I have to risk money for my living and I am still living fairly well by all accounts. For those who wants to make money, here is a certainty, Spurs will win one cup and finish 3rd in the league. Now Zip up Smidth.
by Laughing Lillywhite on August 05, 2008
The league table doesnt lie this much is true, the table shows that we are on level points as Liverpool, Man Utd et-al, last season was history, thats the beauty of football,a new dawn begins every August. Silly Northern Person, your mother smells of elderberries