Home > Football > Get rid of Arsenal, Manchester United, Chelsea and Liverpool - let's have a REAL league!
by Gerry Horsfield on 31 December 2007
Email this Article (59) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Big savings on football products from boots to balls!
Comments (59)
by hughsey on December 31, 2007
watched man city last night and it showed where we are short. need to bring in 2 midfielders and 1 stiker.for us to compete we need a class midfield, fernandes and ireland to soft ned a gatuso orgerrard type players what do other blues think.
by Anon on December 31, 2007
What a load of tosh! Great idea, let's just ruin domestic football shall we... the gap is closing between the top 4 and the rest, give it 2 more seasons and there will not be so much of a gap! If you want to improve the domestic game in England, reduce the number of Champions League places available to English clubs to 2!!!
by Blinkered on December 31, 2007
What a load of cack! Arsenal have consistently spent far less than most teams in the league, never mind the likes of Chelsea, liverpool and uNITED. tOTTNUM, NEWCASTLE, cITY, eVERTON HAVE ALL SPENT MORE THAN THE gUNNERS. eVEN sUNDERLAND HAVE DONE THIS YEAR. sO, TO RECAP, WHILE THE PRETENDERS OF whl SPEND FORTUNES, aRSENAL CONTINUE TO PUNCH WELL ABOVE THEIR WEIGHT SHOWING THAT GREAT MANAGERS CANB GET RESULTS WITHOUT RESORTING TO THE OPEN CHEQUEBOOK.
by sportingohome... on December 31, 2007
another great article, especially seeing as the prem is as open as it has ever been in the last ten years...maybe not in terms of where the title will end up, but in terms of the league as a whole...
by David Sagar on December 31, 2007
If we were to remove the big 4 what do you think would happen? There would be teams that start to dominate again and over the following 5 - 10 seasons the same pattern would appear. Not to mention where would you plan on putting the "big 4"? European Super league... I hope not!!!
by fgtrg on December 31, 2007
oh god i wish i sell my 2 million home if you can get rid of arsenal
by Andy on December 31, 2007
I suspect your heading for a wake up when Liverpool finish 5th or sixth. Personally, I would settle for the current top four being refereed in a similar manner to the rest of the league - that would cut down the points gap straight away.
by Dipayan Ghosh, 19 on December 31, 2007
As a THFC fan, I totally disagree with everything that's been said here; let's take a look at, specifically, Tottenham. We finished fifth for the past two seasons, and the only reason that we didn't finish fourth is because the players came down with food-poisoning in the final match of last season. Otherwise, they were fourth for the entire second half of the season. Also, we have just as good a chance as Arsenal to win the Carling this year; anyone who saw their league match this month would know as much. And what is this about giving the Championship more attention? People the world over pay to watch the EPL because it IS the richest league, and thus can attract the best players from all over. It is the most international and competitive league that there is, because the highest reward is attached with being in the EPL. And for the record, yes, Fulham are a bigger club than Wolverhampton, and yes, Bolton are much bigger than West Brom - anyone who has followed the premiership over the past ten years know
by ms on December 31, 2007
whatsoever..the premier league is a very entertaining affair........
by JimB on December 31, 2007
[quote]If we were to remove the big 4 what do you think would happen? There would be teams that start to dominate again and over the following 5 - 10 seasons the same pattern would appear. Not to mention where would you plan on putting the "big 4"? European Super league... I hope not!!![/quote] Excellent post. You're quite right. Get rid of the current top four and you'd soon have a new elite. Even though, as a Spurs fan, I cannot reasonably hope for my team to challenge for the Premiership in the immediate future, I see no reason why that shouldn't change. Spurs, like a few other clubs, has enough fans and enough money to believe that they can eventually crack the top four and win the Premiership. And it would only be a truly worthwhile achievement for any club if they had to beat ALL England's clubs to do so. To win a Premiership shorn of the current top four would be a hollow victory indeed.
by piken79 on December 31, 2007
this is actually a great article and you make lots of good points but another team can make it more competitive by making it a 5 or 6 team race
by Fogoff on December 31, 2007
[quote]As a THFC fan, I totally disagree with everything that's been said here; let's take a look at, specifically, Tottenham. We finished fifth for the past two seasons, and the only reason that we didn't finish fourth is because the players came down with food-poisoning in the final match of last season. Otherwise, they were fourth for the entire second half of the season. Also, we have just as good a chance as Arsenal to win the Carling this year; anyone who saw their league match this month would know as much. And what is this about giving the Championship more attention? People the world over pay to watch the EPL because it IS the richest league, and thus can attract the best players from all over. It is the most international and competitive league that there is, because the highest reward is attached with being in the EPL. And for the record, yes, Fulham are a bigger club than Wolverhampton, and yes, Bolton are much bigger than West Brom - anyone who has followed the premiership over the past ten year
by Gooner Eternal on December 31, 2007
Good idea, so we won't bother with the likes of thuggish Bolton, Blackburn etc But be watching beautiful football
by Goonerz4life on December 31, 2007
Cannot agree with the article.Cos in italy and spain league only one or two teams dominate the league while other teams are very minor and uncapable.Italy AC Milan and Inter,Spain Real M. and Barca, all this teams i mentioned won many times of the league title as compare to the english big four.No disrespect to any league,but I think english league is much more competitive.Teams from english premier mid table as compare to other league,are capable to challenge with the top.So y don't get rid of r.mad or ac milan etc. first???
by i c on December 31, 2007
west ham beat united, boro beat arsenal. If you look at net transfer spending over the past ten years it is fact that arsenal are not in the top four in terms of net spending. Maybe instead of kicking the top four out maybe the rest of the league should keep thier managers for more than 5 minutes. Arsenal have Wenger for 10 years not all of them good, but they stuck with him and achieve success. Man United have had Fergie for 20 Rafa's been at liverpool 4 years and counting and have achieved success. Look outside the top 4 which teams have finished consistently in the top 8, Everton who have stuck with Moyes even after finishing in the bottom half the year after finishing 4th. Blackburn have stuck with Mark Hughes. On the other hand Newcastle, Spurs change manager whenever they loose 3 games and wonder why they never progress. Portsmouth are another exapmle nealy got relegated, stuck with redknapp and are progressing. Look what happened in the period redknapp was at southhamton. Bottom line is stability bree
by bob on December 31, 2007
It is sadly true that the Premiership is now only open to 4 clubs, despite the 'nearly' performances of Everton and Spurs recently. Let's not forget that even they had to sell Rooney and Carrick recently, and the pro Man U press are again trying to make Berbatov move. It is a fact now that top players only want to play in the CL, and whether they arrive at a CL team thought a big money transfer or are picked up earlier in their careers by Arsenal, the effect is the same. How to change it? Firstly, introduce a rule that no team can be in the CL two years running unless they win it. This will immediately increase the number of Prem teams with a chance to 8 or more. Add to this a limit on the squad sizes allowed and the number of non UK players in each club and you will have a competitive league again with the best players spread out among more clubs, not bench warming for the current CL teams. Someone at the FA needs the balls to deal with the curreny monopoly. In any other business it would be considered ill
by Essexian76 on December 31, 2007
A team that dominated the league, in all the years I've watched football one team has always been head and shoulders above the rest, in fact its more open.In my humble opinion with the advent of more money coming into the prem, a more competative league will ensue, as more players are drawn to the higher wage structure the EPL offer. I prefer the league at it stands at the moment, than it was in the seventies, eighties (Liverpool), and the ninteties (Man Utd, every other season, with the occaisional blip (Arsenal). The question is really is it better to watch nowdays, is the product value for money?, and can it be improved upon!
by stuckontoffee on December 31, 2007
[quote]Good idea, so we won't bother with the likes of thuggish Bolton, Blackburn etc But be watching beautiful football[/quote] yes lets play hoofball and use are hands to score goals. Thats the football i want to see
by Ginge1 on December 31, 2007
Totally agree. Spurs finished 5th two seasons running, have spent a fortune and have been closest of any team to break in. This is however the problem as their best player wants to play in the CL and as spurs won't make that this year he'll be off to one of the big 4. If Man City continue to perform well but don't crack the top 4, Micah Richards (who is already stalling on a new contact) Elano and the likes will also have their heads turned and be off. As such the players contracts mean clish and the CL is a closed shop. As for reducing the number of teams in the CL seems like a good idea two teams would mean that the CL places are not guranteed and so top players might be tempted to stay with their current teams. As for Arsenal - runing English football, how can you have a side that has only two domestic players that ever even make the squad? Why don't they go and play in France as their players would feel more at home. Also all this Wenger hasn't spent hardly any money!!!!! Yes he has! Walcott Adebayor,
by Bob Burton on December 31, 2007
I could not agree more get rid of the top 4 and lets have a competitive league great idea.I am so fed up now with prem football its all about money and we the fans get ripped off every time.
by Charles Cook on December 31, 2007
Please stop grouping Arsenal with the others..... Why are ManU, Pool and Chelsea again lining up to spend big in Jan? because they cannot compete with the Arsenal youth system! The only player to break in off the bat was Sagna....and who had heard of him in the past, hell, Flamini? Betdner? Eduardo? Here is a great idea.....get a good team of scouts! Quit being lazy and relying on debt spending. By the way....on the Man City game: Haman ruled the midfield yesterday and had Sven solved the pathalogical need to give away the bad final pass in the last 30 yards, City would have one. Sven has done a great job with City but he couldn't correct the final pass. Corluka should have been pulled at halftime. To conclude...there is a top 2, not a top 4. Pool and Chelsea cannot seriously challenge. If the lesser teams want to compete...get scouts and make better purchases....and learn to pass in triangles and run into space.....it really is that simple!
by tf1 villla on December 31, 2007
Absolutely true.the gap may be closing but same old, same old i'm afraid.Outside the top 4 the rest are only also rans.s*** league where the top 4 need the rest more than we need them.
by Prasac on December 31, 2007
one of the best article about english football(or football in generally) I've read for a long time.Bravo and keep doing that way!