Home > More sports > SEVEN reasons why rugby is a better game than American Football
by Donna Gee on 10 September 2008
Email this Article (4) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
OK America, I know you’ll disagree – but over here in the UK we have a game which leaves your so-called ''football'' for dead.
If you hadn’t disappeared from the real world into the Bushes (by George, what a clever play on words), you’d realise that FOOTBALL is actually the game the rest of the world plays - the one you refer to over there as ''soccer''. I mean, how can you call a game football when the only time anyone kicks the ball is to convert a try or land what you call a field goal?
A try? Well, in the real world that’s the term for a touchdown. And by REAL world, I mean the entire globe, not the planet according to that admittedly quite large bit of land between California and New York.
The game I’m talking about, by the way, is called rugby. You may have heard of it – in fact you made a rather pathetic attempt to copy it when you nicked our oval-ball idea in order to invent your own grid-iron game way back when. In fact, I’m told the intelligent guys among you still play rugby quite a lot at university. And I’m not talking about College Football - why anyone should care so much about the kids’ version of grid-iron is another mystery to us Brits.
Anyway, rugby is just as tough as your game, if not tougher. Only our players don’t dress up as a bouncy castles and plonk crash helmets on their heads. What’s all that about, for heaven’s sake? Apart from anything, it turns the hundreds of players in every team into faceless zombies.
I believe the original distortion of the rules of rugby in the United States was largely down to some guy called Walter Camp (who presumably was a lot more macho than his name). It’s so sad because had you stuck to the REAL game invented by William Webb Ellis at Rugby School in 1823, you guys could have been a real force at rugby. Maybe even in the same class as the mighty New Zealand All Blacks, the most successful international team of all time.
You talk about your quarterbacks. Well, we have guys called outside-halves, they are the ultimate playmakers - and in Dan Carter, the Kiwis have as brilliant a player as the world has ever seen.
Anyway, you chose to create your own version of the game. Fair enough, even if you did bend every rule that existed, to the point that you even allow the ball to be passed FORWARD. How ridiculous can you get?
OK, we did make a bit of a mess of things over here early last century and a political shambles over professionalism saw the game split into two codes. But they remain very similar – and these days players can switch between rugby league and rugby union with little problem.
To sum up, these are the reasons why American Football is subservient to rugby (either code).
1. Rugby is a worldwide game, while American Football is played seriously in only a handful of countries. Well, not even that - just the US and Canada, really. The International Rugby Board rankings list 95 nations (the USA is actually 20th, so there’s still hope for America if you come over to the real world). New Zealand are ranked No.1 at rugby union and, since you have a population 100 times as big as theirs, the sky should be the limit. And the Aussies are best at rugby league, so you’ve got a chance there to bring the cocky so-and-so’s down to earth.
2. Rugby is all action for 80 minutes. American Football is all inaction for four hours – arguably the slowest game on earth. Jut try turning the TV on at random in the middle of a game. If there aren’t ads showing and anything is actually happening, it’s a miracle. And if anyone says cricket is slower, I’ll let Geoffrey Boycott loose on them (in-joke for the Brits).
3. Rugby players lay into each other like real men, with just the flimsiest of body padding. Grid-iron players are unrecognisable as human beings with all that body armour.
4. Rugby is played by two teams of 15 players (13 in rugby league). Between them, they have expertise in both attack and defence (note correct spelling of defence). Grid-iron players aren’t good enough to attack AND defend, so a squad of immobile 300lb elephants are programmed to come on and stop the attackers, who are the only guys who can really play the game.
5. Rugby doesn’t need flimsily-dressed cheerleaders to give the male fans some real excitement. We also celebrate the scoring of tries with applause and back-slapping, not lots of ridiculous dancing and high fives.
6. Rugby is played in ALL conditions – on grass, not synthetic turf, as seemingly used by most NFL teams. That stuff is more dangerous than the opposition, for heaven’s sake. I’ve never seen a grid-iron game played in mud and pouring rain. Now that would be worth watching!
7. Finally, and most important, this article is all a bit of fun and not to be taken seriously. I’m a woman who was reared on rugby union (I’m actually from Wales, where rugby is everything). The reality is that the best game is the one that appeals to YOU. It’s all subjective so whatever your preferences, may the best game win! (Wales is the bit that sticks out to the left of England on the map, by the way).
Now let's get down to things that really matter. Which is better...rugby union or rugby league?
Comments (4)
by Carl Lewis on September 09, 2008
This Poor Excuse of an article is a salacious for the sake of being so and it's author terribly misinformed. First let me state I have nothing agaist rugby I've played it in college on a club team it was alot of concussion inducing fun. so hats off to all rugby and it's cousin Aussie rules footy. Football used to look alot like ruby leather helmets and all but as we tend to do her in America we got bigger lots bigger. and pads were added and the game changed to in principal at least make it safer. In football we also have something else called plays which is the closest thing to sicence as you will find on any pitch or field. Rugby is a high class version of kill the carrier which I suspect is not that far removed. It's like hockey on a field only with out stick and the skills. also rugby players are small hell all English people are small. you couldn't put them in pads on the field with a JV squad in D3 becasue they would get their asses flattened, we're just bigger. lets not even mention the fact that every one on a foot ball team no matter how big can run a sub 5.5s 40 yard dash. Seeing as how the author I gather, has never played the game of football and don't know how bull in the ring in practice feels or getting clipped by a defensive end at full speed so I understand your ignorance. We don't diss your passions for soccer and cricket and curling and rugby and lets not forget polo those are all great sports in thier own right, played by small slow people who like for some reason to get concussions to prover their toughness and thats fine! But theres no comparison of the athleticism of a football player and a rugby player it's like apples and grapes. you're the grape you sherry swilling limey brit
by Matt on September 10, 2008
Im a rugby fanatic from Australia but just wanted to say i've seen American Football and it is not 'inferior' to rugby, it can be quite enjoyable if you get into it. Rugby is my #1 preferance though and you should encourage Americans to give it a go rather than tell them watch rugby because it is a better game than American Football.
by Desi Writer on September 14, 2008
A nice one for someone like me who's not exposed to Rugby too much.
by Ricky Kake on September 15, 2008
The dallas cowboys have only a few players over 300lbs most are around the 220lbs which equals 100kg's...there are many top line rugby players that weight heavier than 100kgs. Rugby is mans game. No pads. No helmets. 80 mins of physical battle.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
REVEALED: Arsenal's secret dressing-room bust-ups - by Captain Calamity
England's Stuart Broad following in the footsteps of father Chris - now there's a real Test!
New York Knick-ers in a twist over no-play, full-pay Stephon Marbury
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.