Home > Rugby > Rugby Union > New Zealand's Super 14 dominance points to a vintage All Blacks year
New Zealand's Super 14 dominance points to a vintage All Blacks year
With the Crusaders, Blues and Chiefs holding three of the top four spots, New Zealand - winners of all but three super championship titles - are building strong impetus for the international season.
by James Mortimer on 06 April 2008
Email this Article (6) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
As the Super 14 season begins its final rounds, four of the five New Zealand teams are strong enough and in a position to mount a serious challenge for the title.
First, let’s look at a combined snapshot of the four teams in contention. Otago, the only team from New Zealand not in the picture – are hardly an embarrassed team. They contain only two international capped players. Their worst loss was by 15 points to the Waikato Chiefs. All of their other losses were by no more than eight points – three of them by four points or less. They are a team in the first year of rebuilding, with 12 players debuting at Super 14 level – twice as much as any other team in the tournament.
The top four Kiwi teams currently hold a combined 21 wins and eight losses (with one draw), with 834 points scored against 577 conceded. While some may argue that these ledgers are greatly favoured by the performance of the six-time champions, the Crusaders, the reality is that this team wields four of the central cogs to the All Black machine in Richie McCaw, Dan Carter, Ali Williams and Leon Macdonald.
The real threat of the New Zealand sides has been in attack. They continue their historic strength of positive running rugby, coupled with authoritative ruck play, and variation to their strike power. With the exception of the Hurricanes - who have lacked their traditional freewheeling attack patterns – the New Zealand teams are far and away the most successful offensive units in the competition.
Like the All Blacks, they rarely play percentage rugby and keep the ball in hand, relying on a loose blueprint for their game plans. The exception to this are the Crusaders, who incorporate both styles into their tried-and-tested style of play – incorporating lethal counter-attacking mentality with a rational kicking game.
All New Zealand teams, Otago included, utilise these attacking mentalities with a robust set piece. All have improved markedly with their lin- outs, with key line-out options competing far more than previously seen. But, as seen over the last four years, the scrum - now with a more prominent role in the modern game under the ELVs – is a dominant weapon in the Kiwi game.
Defensively, the Kiwi teams have been firm – but have at times been brittle, with an attitude that the best defence is a good offence. The two leaders in this category have been the Crusaders and the Hurricanes, with the first and third ranked defensive records respectively; although the two teams incorporate a very different style.
The tournament’s top team rely on a patient set line of defence with a drift, with McCaw often hanging back off the first tackles to impose on the tackle area. The Hurricanes rely on their All Black trio of loose forwards, and immense man-on-man tackling – almost an offensive defensive system.
But their team’s willingness to play loose football has led to strong teams capitalising on lack of structure. Also, a deficiency of trust has led to players moving out of defensive lines. But when teams decide to stand up to Kiwi physicality, they often draw them into playing away from their natural style, which can at times make them look ordinary.
Case in point the Blues and the Chiefs. who have lost games, especially at the contact area with physical South African packs.
The biggest concern is the weakness sometimes exhibited by the All Black team – and this is best exemplified by the Auckland Blues. Confidence – which the Blues showed in droves in their first three games in the season, scoring 18 tries. In five games since, they have scored only eight; and to be realistic, they look a fading unit, despite having nine past or present All Blacks in their XV.
I will be bold and state that New Zealand teams are the best players of rugby on the planet. But when supremely challenged, they are wanting in the mental discipline of top competition.
This shows a simple lesson for Graham Henry when compiling the first All Black team of 2008. Continue the great traditional of attack minded rugby, but instal the necessary intelligence and percentage play to avoid the ensuing mental disintegration that has lost key games over New Zealanders' proud history.
Current New Zealand teams (courtesy of Rugby Heaven.co.nz)
Comments (6)
by 3N Balance on April 07, 2008
Crusaders will stay in the top 4 for sure. No doubt about that. But dont get me wrong, at least two of the Blues, Chiefs and the 'Canes will drop out of top 4 contention as the season goes on. Aussie contenders Force and the 'Tahs, along with the SA contenders Sharks and the Stormers are no dumb idiots and they'll be out there to push the other Kiwi sides out. Expect top 4 to be filled with the following at the end of the season: NZ => Crusaders + (one of the Chiefs, Blues or 'Canes) AUS => (one of Force or NSW) SA => Sharks
by I agree on April 07, 2008
I agree with 3N Balance. Apart from the Crusaders, no other NZ teams look to be safe at all for top 4 berth. The Blues are extremely shaky now with Rokocoko out for 4 months and looking to be fading away. The 'Canes well... they're still within a shot but I reckon they'll screw up BIG time in their 3 week SA tour (to the Bulls and the Stormers). The Chiefs look like they're on fire but they still have to tackle the Crusaders (which I dont see them winning at all even though it's at home in Hamilton) and also the Sharks in Durban and the Force in Perth. They'll drop out. Instead, Western Force and the Waratahs look to be on track at the moment from Australia while the Stormers cannot be written off at all with 5 home matches in Cape Town coming up. My top 4 prediction: Crusaders (1st) - Sharks (2nd) - Waratahs (3rd) - either Force or Stormers (4th)
by geneva williams on April 09, 2008
Hi my name is Geneva and im like watching the rugby teams and my favourite one is the was the All Blacks, i like the hurricanes please send me a-emil back im looking forward to sending u a-emil.
by Rugby Fan on May 08, 2008
The Crusaders are not unbeatable the chiefs have done so and the sharks were very unlucky in their recent visit to Christchurch not to come away with anything. Stuart Dickenson has had better matches.
On the subject of interpretation of the elv in this years super 14. In my humble opinion it has been far too inconsistent with numerous controversial results. I have noticed in most of the matches I have watched different interpretations at the breakdown with refs gradually favouring one side at the breakdown. Rolling away and playing the ball off your feet is not punished enough for my liking. The inconsistencies are killing the traditional battle in the loose for ascendence.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
How Graeme Smith cast agony aside and proved he is cricket's Captain Courageous
Manchester United v Chelsea: Stand by for drama at the Theatre of Dreams
Has Walter Smith finally lost the plot at Rangers?
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.