Home > Rugby > Rugby Union > Stormy weather for gutsy Ireland as All Blacks get back on track
by James Mortimer on 08 June 2008
Email this Article (28) Comments
It was a match where the weather demonstrated before the kick-off that there would not be a blow-out score. New Zealand and Ireland could both call themselves wet weather specialists – and two of the more polished kicking five eighths (fly-halves) in world rugby displayed their wares in a game that was never going to be flamboyant and was an intriguing arm wrestle.
Credit to the Irish. Their game plan was effective and Ronan O’Gara’s kicking game was the better by a points decision. The defensive determination, led by an all-Munster tight ruck defence – was difficult for the New Zealanders to penetrate, especially considering less space afforded to teams under the traditional laws.
The ELVs - rules that the Southern Hemisphere have been playing under for over three months – clearly gave an advantage to the Irish, who have not had to operate under changes that are designed to open a game up.
It was the best performance by an Irish national side in 12 months. They knew they could end a 103-year drought against the men in Black, and they certainly ran them close.
Despite their Heineken Cup-winning pack, Ireland found that an All Black eight is a far more imposing proposition than any European forward unit. By the end of the game, the 2008 hybrid of the New Zealand forwards were clear victors. They constantly made inroads through the vaunted Munster pillar defence, and were clearly dominant in the scrum exchanges. The lineout, so often a weak point of the All Black game, dominated a lineout that was most ascendant operation in Europe.
The tackle area was ferociously contested, with the green wall showing magnificent poise against what is realistically the world’s foremost attacking team. Richie McCaw cemented his position as the best openside flanker on the planet in a possessed concerto. His defence and ruck turnovers were magnificent; a true “follow me to the trenches, men” performance to end his World Cup nightmares.
Aside from a poor defensive read on their own line when Paddy Wallace scored a soft try, the All Black rearguard system was solid – with Rodney So’oialo backing up his captain, and the new midfield of Ma'a Nonu and Conrad Smith shutting down any second phase Irish movement.
No player on either side had a weak game. If there was truly a difference between the teams it was ultimately in the backline, where Ireland's Brian O’Driscoll-led threequarters rarely touched the ball. However, sublime touches by his opposite number Smith, who embarrassed his illustrious opponent, led to the creation of a try by Sitiveni Sivivatu. In the second half, Dan Carter – showing his class as a running fly-half, made a scything line-break through the Irish defensive heart, where tight forwards Ali Williams and John Schwalger linked with the menacing Nonu, who scored the match breaker.
The All Blacks won - which, after a disastrous World Cup and a build-up media week where the darlings of New Zealand were knocked at every pass, was all they needed. Neemia Tialata had a titanic game which showed that Carl Hayman’s loss may not be keenly felt – which was backed by a classic hunting pack performance that showed that, as always, the All Black forwards will be a threat to any nation they play.
The backline, on a night where backs were spending most time thinking of how to avoid hypothermia – showed enough for the contentious midfield positions to maybe be a thing of the past.
England may have a stronger pack than the Irish, but whether they can mount as effective a challenge against the All Blacks remains to be seen. The much-feared honeymoon game of the World Cup is now over, and the New Zealanders will become mightier with each week together; especially if Graham Henry avoids his famed rotations.
Meanwhile, the Irish, on the back of a terrible World Cup and average Six Nations, look as if they may have finally turned the corner. They were not shamed in this performance, and if the weather is poor against the Wallabies – notoriously bad wet-weather performers – they will back themselves to record a tour win and finish their season on a high.
Redemption is a word not used often, but to record their first win on Australian soil in 29 years would justify its application.
Comments (28)
on June 08, 2008 on June 08, 2008
All black will be a world power always! not only in 2008!
by online roulette online roulette on June 08, 2008
vu7uuze-bxw55uw-tw6q06bd-0 <a href="http://urlser.com/?xFj4E#2">insurance|progressiv e insurance|allstate insurance|insurance|automobile insurance|renters insurance|insurance|insurance online|insurance rates|insurance|progressive insurance|allstate insurance|insurance|automobile insurance|renters insurance</a> http://urlser.com/?aBCA5#1 [url=http://online-poker-mo.lookera.net#3]online poker|texas holdem|free poker|online poker|texas holdem|online poker|online poker|poker games|poker tables[/url] [url]http://urlser.com/?aBCA5#4[/url] [http://texas-holdem-mo.lookera.net#5 texas holdem|texas holdem poker|texas holdem hands|texas holdem|texas holdem|online poker|texas holdem|poker games|poker tables] "online gambling|online casino gambling|internet casino gambling|online gambling|casino games|online casino|online gambling|no deposit casinos|casino|online gambling|casino|casinos|online gambling|casino games|free casino games|online gambling":http://online-gambling-mo.lookera.net#6 [LINK http://urlser.com/?m6c0v#7]auto insurance|car insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|auto insurance|free online auto insurance quotes|cheap car insurance|auto insurance|car insurance|car insurance quotes|auto insurance|cheap auto insurance|free online auto insurance quotes[/LINK]
by Sean Bowman on June 09, 2008
Mr Mortimer, Its quite funny to see how much someone(YOU) can suffer from delusions of grandeur.. The All Blacks over the last 15 years have been the most consistant team in world rugby (apart from the years 1998/1999/2003/2004/2007.. I read your article on the 6th June on Allblacks.com about how great the All Blacks are and how South Africa and Austrailia are only half decent because they play the All Blacks.. Blah Blah.. Are you Stupid? Those two countries have won 4 of the 6 worldcups played, how many have the All Blacks won? Oh yes thats right 1! Just because the crusaders have won 7 super14 titles you think that justfies NZ being the best.. rubbish( the Super14 format is flawed and everybody knows it does not suit SA teams due to the unreasonable travel involved) How many NZ teams taste success when they play in SA( not many) Before 1999 The boks had a better win record against the All Blacks so that blows your theory about who was the best over a 100 years.. The boks still remain the only team who have white washed the All Blacks 3-0 in a test series.. The All Blacks have only got the upper hand in the last 10 years.. I appreciate that your article is intended for NZ readers and the younger generation might buy into those false and somewhat deluded views of yours.. I challange you to submit those views on a neutral site and see what time of reponse you get!
by Lemon Squeezer on June 10, 2008
Up until the start of the professional era in 95' the boks had won 21 to the AB's 18 tests, with ten victories each on opposition soil. In the 29 matches since the pro era began AB's have won 20 matches with boks only tasting victory 8 times.Since 95' the Boks have been defeated 10 times on home soil by AB's, with NZ losing only once.NZ have scored 1289 points compared to 1081 scored against, have more wins in a row with 8 compared to 6 from SA, and the AB's highest winning margin over boks is 36 compared to SA's measly 17. We are only 1 WC behind SA and Aus, and the fact is NZ has won the Super14 10 times with SA and Aus lifting the trophy in turn only 3 times. The truth is that if there were as many NZers as there are South Africans our record against you would be far greater.
by sean bowman on June 10, 2008
Lemon there is little doubt who has been the better team between the All Blacks and the Springboks in the professional era.. That was not my argument to Mortimers uneducated and somewhat over inflated opinion of the All Blacks.. Mortimers claim was that the The Boks are only half decent because they played the All Blacks which is laughable.. History shows that over 80 years before the pro era began in the mid ninties it was the Boks who were stronger than the All Blacks( ask your dad) which blows Mortimers claim out the window. The fact that the All Blacks have ganied accendency over the last 13 years is down to a number of outside factors.. a) Politicions dont choose your national team b) The tri nations/Super14 is suited to NZ and AUS due to geographical location.. c) you have a host of countries supplying you with players The boks on the other hand are managed by a bunch of idiots at SARU who in turn is managed by our goverment.. The boks have quite often fielded an understrengh team due to transformation so we are always playing at 80%. With regards to worldcups, yes we have only one 1 more than you but we have played in 2 less world cups.. NZ playing record in world cups ( played 6 won 1) The boks ( played 4 won 2) Who is better on the biggest stage of all then? Also take into account that the Boks have played NZ 3 times in the world cup which we have won on 2 occasions... NZ are the Spain of rugby, Chokers.. When it really counts The All blacks fail deliver time and time again ( can you therefore call yourself the best?) NO!
by James Mortimer on June 10, 2008
Bowman, if you read my articles consistently, you will find that I for the most point have an even viewpoint to my work. My article about the All Blacks greatness was a response to the overwhelming negativity they have had directed at them over the last few months. One World Cup loss does not mark the end of a truly dominant era. People everywhere (including an unnamed author on sportingo) have mocked the All Blacks and as a passionate supporter I STOOD UP FOR THEM. I will to a small degree concede your point regarding World Cups - quite simply, the All Blacks should have won more. But their record at these cannot detract from their relative superiority at all other levels (super 14, tri nations, bledisloe's, sevens, overall test records, etc). Your comments about Super 14 travel is pathetic - it goes both ways. Maybe you should read some of my other articles before your one eyed bleating clogs up the Sportingo website. Oh yes, and how does my opinion reflect that I suffer from delusions of grandeur. A personal attack hardly justifies your point.
"History shows that over 80 years before the pro era began in the mid ninties it was the Boks who were stronger than the All Blacks( ask your dad) which blows Mortimers claim out the window." Throughout the amateur era Boks won 3 more matches than AB's, so dont give me any crap about how they were stronger, they were even.
In the end we are, all of us, bound together by our love for this great game. Long may our legendary rivalries continue!
by Sean Bowman on June 10, 2008
James, I am still going through your articles.. I only came across views this week on Allblacks.com and althought it was nicely constructed towards NZ fans, it insulted supports across the sea.. I am also very proud of what my country has done for the support and the Springboks are as much a brand as the All Blacks. I have also had the greatest respect for NZ rugby and the people. So when i read an article like that which obviously serves to make NZ supports feel good about thier heros who failed to deliver at the worldcup again by degrading the achievements of the Springboks it annoys me... Yes you have dominated rugby in recent times but i have a feeling that this year is going to be a torid one for the Might All blacks.. The boks looked impressive last weekend and Australia are going to be very strong with Deans as coach.. You must be a little scared?
I will make no apology about an article regarding my support for my beloved All Blacks - whom my pride for is immense, but by the same token I have had a four year reoccurring nightmare when they have fallen at the great hurdle of the World Cup. But these failures (yes they are failures) cannot detract from a record that is outstanding. I can't wait for the Tri Nations, as it will be a tremendous series as always - with each SANZAR powerhouse likely again to be the top three nations in the world. But scared, not likely, having the Springboks and Wallabies strong makes for a better game - and my All Blacks will be relishing the challenge, as will their opponents. By the way, if you don't like one eyed views, maybe you should read your compatriots Greg Smiths articles.
by ALL BLACKS FOREVER on June 10, 2008
the all blacks will this year win another tri nations crown, a far harder tournament to win than the world cup - bokkies can't fall back on your pretend world cup forever
by ALL BLACK number one on June 10, 2008
AWESOME RECORD, AWESOME PLAYERS, AWESOME LOOKING, NUFF SAID. ALL BLACKS ARE SO GOOD THEY COULD WIN A SOCCER WORLD CUP.
by Nesian Rugby on June 10, 2008
Sean, a) Politicions dont choose your national team - how is that our problem? we have selection issues due to bias coaches aswell - everyone has there agenda, deal with it and play the game. We had the CanterBlacks (When Deans was assistant coach) which riled people here no end so did you hear us saying we're playing at only 81.27% strength? Didn't think so. b) The tri nations/Super14 is suited to NZ and AUS due to geographical location - hahaha. Don't play if its too hard for you. We have to get on a plane too mate. c) you have a host of countries supplying you with players - who? do you mean Zambia and zimbabwe? your ignorance of NZ's ethnic makeup is pathetic. Don't see many spiteful articles about Chavanga, Skinstad, Mujati, Mtawarira, Krige, Teichmann and Garvey to name a few so eat some humble pie there. I'm a NZ-born Samoan, my parents went to school here in NZ, I can't speak Samoan fluently, I know more about NZ culture than Samoan - in fact when foreign-born Samoans are in Samoa, they're considered 'Palagi' meaning foreigner so you're hearing it straight from the horses mouth. Try listening to NZ-born Polynesian players english compared to Island born players on TV or ask them to speak their island language...er, um not gonna happen! d) Going back to compare records only up to 1999 is a cop out. Just as bad as some Kiwis saying you've only won one more WC than us. Who cares! we just want to add to the history we've already created which I'm afraid including the current world champs means dominating every single opponent we've ever played in the history of the game, no pro vs amateur, post-apartheid, or 'we weren't at the world cup' excuses just straight out head-to-head I agree that people big up the All Blacks way too much, we love the team for what they achieve and get frustrated when things aren't executed perfectly. A lot of kiwis need to wake up to the reality that they're human and will lose the odd game,quit blaming the ref, acknowledge other teams player - basically do their homework on the opposition before passing judgement. But equally those on the outside who knock Kiwis no end for trying to punch above their weight should look at themselves and wonder how the hell a small poxy country at the edge of the earth so far from everything with a little over 4 million people can consistenly achieve in the rugby world across EVERYTHING rugby - Test matches vs ALL opponents (straight head-to-head), Tri-nations (ABs 8 out of 12 years), Super 12/14 (NZ team 10 out of 13 years), IRB Sevens (NZ 8 out of 9 years), Womens rugby (3 out 5 World Cups) etc etc. We are a proud rugby nation, yet we need to be humble.
Jeepers.. Nesian chill out my friend, I never said our polictical problems in sport is a kiwi problem. My point was it annoys me that the days of choosing the best 15 for my country are a thing of the past which is down to the Morans that created Apartheid in our beautiful country. That will always be a problem and im sorry to say but we will never be able to oeprate at a 100% because of it which is not good for sport With regards to your comments about the Zimb and Namibia born players- you have a point although Namibia used to be apart of SA and Percy's parents are both South African as are Korne's. However the All Black team is known for fielding many islanders. The All blacks are the number 1 team for poaching players from different countries- look up the stats yourself.. SA are not even in the same league there fella.. In my opinon SA has the most talented athletes in the world. We have supplied every major rugby playing nation with players who went on to represent thier adopted nations.. NZ(2) Andrew Merts/Greg Rawlinson, France(3), Aus(2), Eng(3) The problem my beloved Bokke and Sharks is that when we play away in the Tri Nations/Super14 we have to travel 5 weeks a time.. Its not very fair in terms of seeing who is the best to be honest( Even your commentators agree with that statement) Bottom line is the farmers from South Africa are born to play the farmers from NZ.. Im proud of our history with the All Blacks.. It will Remain the greatest rugby rivalry and long may it continue
The Springboks are the World Champions and number 1 ranked team in the world.. god that feels good to say!
by Nesian Rugby on June 11, 2008
Good on you for winning the tournament - I backed the Boks once we bowed out. However, you still miss the point about Islanders. a) 'the All Black team is known for fielding many islanders.' For f*cks sake - have you not heard of migration? Just like your British and Dutch forefathers, islanders have also migrated albeit more recently - I quote: Figures from the 2006 census report in New Zealand show that New Zealand's Pacific population stands at 265,974, up 15 per cent on the 2001 figures and nearly 60 per cent on the 1991 census. Auckland is the LARGEST polynesian city in the world. You shouldn't believe all the stories u read on NZ poaching, I am NZ Samoan and NZ is my home along with all my Samoan uncles aunties friends brothers sisters cousins etc. To say we were poached is an insult. We are proud of our Samoan heritage but NZ is home and where we live. b) 'The All blacks are the number 1 team for poaching players from different countries - look up the stats yourself' Where would you like me to look up the stats? You mean the stats Planet Rugby compiled at the last world cup http://worldcup.planet-rugby.com/Story/0,21043,13089_2 760268,00.html So who supplies who?
by Lemon Squeezer on June 11, 2008
Andrew Mehrtens parents are New Zealanders who were on a working holiday in SA when Andrew was born. He comes from a distinguished Canterbury family! Hes all KIWI mate.
"Just as bad as some Kiwis saying you've only won one more WC than us" These guys need to be reminded that they havent dominated NZ at the WC and that we have actually won it before!
by James Mortimer on June 11, 2008
Sean, you're comments regarding poaching of players is so uninformed. Firstly, you clearly have never set foot in New Zealand, which is in itself a Pacific Island country just like Fiji, Tonga and Samoa, inhabited by tribes and indeginous heritage. NZ does not and has never poached Island players - these are young men whom have for the most part lived in NZ there whole life and have been funnelled through the NZ rugby system - HOW DO YOU POACH A PLAYER THAT YOUR NATIONAL SYSTEM HAS GROOMED. And to say that SA has supplied rugby athletes to other countrys, get real mate. NZ rubgy influence is spread throughout the world, but you never hear us hark about it. For god's sake, it's obvious that Peter De Villiers is a Maori :) But seriously, you cannot talk about poaching or our players in the same way that Kiwi's will never insult or question the political landscape in South Africa (and if they do, they shouldn't). Finally, don' t talk to us about being humble by bleating on about being Cup holders and Number one team. Never forget you won that Cup without having to play the Blacks (which John Smit was thankful for) and you did not even beat us in 2007 - so to have dethroned us from a position in which we held for nearly four years unchallenged despite only beating the All Blacks three times in four years (yes, the All Blacks defeated SA six times in four years) is a cop out. ROLL ON THE TRI NATIONS.
The Springboks, World Champions and Number one team in the world, achieved this status by doing the following. 1) not having to play either All Blacks (3-6 record over four years), Wallabies (6-5 record over four years, including a 49-0 smashing) or French (2-5 record since 2000) in the tournament. All teams with strong records against the Boks. Furthermore, how can you dethrone a team from Number one when you didn't even beat them in your so called glory year. So far your Champion nation has lost the first head to heads with NZ, with kiwi Super 14 teams dominating a tournament. I think you might need to start beating NZ team regularly before you carry on with your constant bleating.