Home > Rugby > Rugby Union > Why England, Wales, France and Co are so far behind the Wallabies, Boks and All Blacks
Why England, Wales, France and Co are so far behind the Wallabies, Boks and All Blacks
by Larry Kwirirayi on 12 August 2008
Email this Article (9) Comments
When one watches Schalk Burger charging down Daniel Carter just before he offloads the ball to Mills Muliaina, the adrenaline rush is there for all to see. It is like two bulls at work, tearing each other apart and leaving the grass to suffer the worst.
This is the way that the founding fathers of the game imagined it to be, except being played that way at Twickenham or the Stade de France. However this rugby is now the bread and butter of the southern climes and the prime exponents of these are the three giants involved in the Tri-Nations.
So supreme a level is that competition that, in the realms of force and pleasure, it ranks above the World Cup. It is a different breed and is almost a different game to the one played in the north.
The reality, stark and unbelievable, is that the northern teams just don’t play contact rugby any more. Their bread and butter has become the kick rugby that has been outrun – pun intended – by the power and pace of their southern counterparts.
The backlines in the north are flat. They do not offload the ball quick enough because they are waiting for a kick into touch. In contrast, the players in the southern hemisphere not only offload the ball much quicker but it is done with the recipient at full speed.
The game is played with absolutely no imagination in the north and the subtle bits that characterise the southern game make such a huge difference when it comes to games. And out with it is the passion. The southern sides fight for honour becomes the game there has not been influenced by the money and threats of strikes and the ilk. The stars there play for the badge before the money and when they are offered fat contracts it is based on performance.
And finally it is the outlook of the teams down south. From looking at the way the Super 14 was played you could see that the game was being led in a different direction and this was carried forth into the national team. In short, the clubs are given a national direction and they develop their players to that form. This form is always dynamic, meaning that changes will always be made to the game.
So the next time you fall asleep in front of a Six Nations match, don’t worry too much - a few months more and the Tri-Nations will be here. With some matches starting in the early hours, you'll need all the sleep you can get.
Comments (9)
by rob on August 12, 2008
Fact is that the stats don't show that. the guiness premiership had record crowds and following is increasing whereas the S14 is so boring nobody wants to watch it Northern hemisphere rugby is far more entertaining, and thats proven be people openening thier wallets and paying to see a better show
by Steven on August 12, 2008
I think you're a bit unfair on our game. Sure we can't play the way they play but we are different and not necessarily bad. Who am I kidding?
by Lee on August 12, 2008
Another clueless fan. Rugby is thriving up north and dieing down south. I seriously doubt the author has watched much rugby outside the six nations. Not a contact sport ? That reallys shows how little you know. There is more contact up north. Have you considered the playing conditions ? The weather dictates whether fast rugby can be played and sadly the NH has more wet pitches than the SH has dry ones. Had you watched some NH rugby you would know this. Oh and his name is Mils. Not Mills and Carter rarely passes to him as there are two players in between that he has to pass to before the ball gets to the fullback. Enjoy your game in the SH while you can though because it is going bankrupt and wont be around for much longer. FACT.
by michael howlett on August 13, 2008
your tellin me toulouse play boring rugby, i agree that the southern hemisphere teams play very high level but northern teams are not inferior england had to beat austrailia to get to the final in the rwc. there is tallent in north its unfair to be so harsh on all the teams.
by sean Bowman on August 13, 2008
Article mostly makes sense apart from the comment about NH being less entertaining.. The qaulity of rugby in the South is much better yes and the Super 14 is highly entertaining to watch as it showboats amazing gravity defiying skills but the NH offers a different type of entertainment. The games are allot more tighter and so the fans are more on the edge of thier seats.. So games in the North and South are entertaining.. However the skills on show in the South are still the benchmark in Rugby and ELV's will serve to highlight this fact
by Tim Collins on August 13, 2008
The facts surrounding attendance are indisputable. However, more than that, there are more kicks in open play in SH rugby that NH rugby, and average tries per game are almost identical between the Premiership and the S14. Games in the Premiership are more exciting for the fans, for the simple reason of promotion and relegation meaning that every match, every bonus point, can be vital at the end of the season. All the time that the other championships miss that part, they will lose out on excitment for the fans (and as a Halequins Supporter, I know both sides of that feeling), but still wouldn't swap it
by JDL on August 13, 2008
Only a one eyed ignorant antipodean could have written such drivel. Open the other eye and watch some of the Guiness Premiership, or Top 14. In Kiwiland and Oz you can only dream of clubs playing in front of 80,000 fans - it's becoming a regular occurance up north. Attendances rising, exciting matches, money flowing into the game - that's the NH. Attendances falling, aimless aerial ping pong interspersed with forward passes, players leaving for the NH - that's S14 and the Tri-Nations. There's a great deal of skill in both hemispheres; if only ignorant journalists from down under removed the chips from their shoulders, they'd see it. Now when did the wonderful All Blacks last : A: Reach a World Cup final? B: Win one?
by strums on August 13, 2008
JDL your comments about antipodean ignorance was spot on in response to this authors comments surrounding the entertainment aspect of both hempisphere's bud but you too are showing true english ignorance and arrogance(The worst kind i might add).. The fact is yes i agree the game up here is becoming popular and is entertianing but when you are talking about qaulity on the field it is second to the Tri Nations and super 14 which boasts the top 3 ranked countries in the world. The game up here has improved because SH players are taking up contracts with the clubs, most of which are past thier sell by date anyway
by Brad on August 19, 2008
rugby has nothing to compete with in england cause your pretty crap at all sports here in aussie rugby is a 4th tier sport behind league afl and cricket
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
How Graeme Smith cast agony aside and proved he is cricket's Captain Courageous
Manchester United v Chelsea: Stand by for drama at the Theatre of Dreams
Has Walter Smith finally lost the plot at Rangers?