Home > Rugby > Why the All Blacks won't win the Rugby World Cup until 2019
by Paul Ho on 14 October 2007
Email this Article (18) Comments
The All Blacks had an enviable record of 42 wins in 48 internationals under Graham Henry. They went into the World Cup as favourites and once again came unstuck at the finals. Unfortunately, Test match win-loss statistics hold no relevance in play-offs. The intensity in one-off showdowns is several levels above that of normal Test matches.
In sudden deaths, there are no tomorrows - only four more years. I believe the most telling statistic to look at is New Zealand’s winning record in play-offs. Since 1991, our play-off success rate is sitting at 50%. Our probability of winning three consecutive finals, which is what we need to do to win in a World Cup, is therefore a mere 12.5%. This is effectively one win every eight World Cups. To a long-suffering All Blacks supporter, it means the next win is probably due in 12 years time.
The tag of 'favourites' is the most unfortunate curse and, based on a 12.5% World Cup winning chance, totally unjustified. Because of this tag, supporters and media alike falsely believe that the All Blacks should win every World Cup, placing huge pressure on players. However, I don’t believe that is why we lost.
Players are professionals and they can, and should, be able to cope with this kind of pressure. The real problem is that the players themselves believe they are better than they really are. Going into every tournament, every generation of All Blacks believed they had an edge over their opponents that wasn't there. Every time they were caught out - and sadly every time there were no comebacks.
While commentators say the New Zealand team could not cope with pressure, they lacked composure or they simply choked, the real truth is that the All Blacks, though almighty and almost invincible in Test matches, are in reality a very vulnerable side in play-off situations. To win, they have to be more desperate, more tenacious than any of their opponents. They have to be more ready for a dogfight and they should never believe that they can outclass their enemies as a given.
As All Blacks supporters, we should give up our rights to expect our team to win at the next World Cup. In fact, if we win before 2019, we will have played above our expectations. All Blacks supporters should will our team to continue to live in the possibility of being World Cup champions, to play like champions and be committed to become the champions they know they can be. But we should be honest enough to accept where we truly are.
It doesn’t mean it is impossible to win the next World Cup; knowing where we truly are is a good start. But that alone is not enough. The other important aspect of the game is to learn from failures. Sadly we cannot do that if we continue to dish out retribution to coaches every time they fail.
Coaches and players alike learn an incredible amount during a dramatic failure. The NZRU should work to maximise those learnings, not to diminish them. Hopefully the review from the NZRU should give strategies to provide continuity, to deepen learning, and if necessary, a proper plan to introduce new coaching directions without giving up on the foundations that Graham Henry has laid.
Finally, I quote from Crusaders coach Robbie Deans: ''At this level, it is all a mind game. You need to maximise the experience of those, in terms of the individuals within the team, who have been there and experienced this type of play before. It is also important to maximise the collective preparatory experience by fielding combinations that are as well established as is possible."
What do you believe the All Blacks should do to increase their play-off win ratio - and, more importantly, their chances at the next World Cup? Post a comment below or submit an article to Sportingo. Twelve more years we wait.
Comments (18)
by Apa Galu on October 14, 2007
I just want to say that I totally agree with the atticle above. I also agree with the rotation that G. Henry has been doing but I think on the world cup year he should work on a permanate side. Keep G. Henry and the coaching staff. He's done very well as coach... Thanks
by Maika on October 15, 2007
Rugby is simple and the AB wants it to play expensively. Any opposing team study the AB's and counter the play plan and we cannot change it at that time. There are plenty chance to for a field goal, and we did not because we think we can score tries from anywhere. In the world cup we just need a win. That is what England is doing. We must learn from them on how they approach the game. Thanks
by Richard Davies on October 15, 2007
New Zealand has not performed up to its ability at any world cup since the first one. Specifically, we are not able to get past the knockout stages. Any review should look at why this is and how to prevent it. The exception to this is the 1995 campaign where we got to the final and narrowly lost due to the illness of the players. What was done in that campaign that allowed the team to get to the final? Has anything been done differently in the other campaigns? Secondly, NZ teams do not seem to be able to change the game plan if the one they’re using isn’t working. This is not a modern phenomenon, but I can recall matches back when Gary Whetton was captain where they seemed unwilling or unable to change a losing game plan. Looking back over the World Cup quarters and semis we have lost, this seems to be a consistent theme. When the game starts to go wrong, there is an inability of the team to recognise that and change something. Again, this is not something which just happened this year, but h
by John Christie on October 15, 2007
Paul - twice now you have stated that the RWC is 2 levels of intensity above a test match - explain that comment please?
For me the issue is: 1. Rugby is a tough sport where games cannot be won without all out effort. 2. The All Blacks winning record and favouritism prior in all R.W. Cups(expect 1987 where we were not favourites) has borne complacency - related to point 1 ie the All Blacks are meeting teams that hungrier and more determined than them. Success like the All Blacks have had breeds arrogance which breeds complacency?? I believe that Martin Johnson is saying similar things?? I dont believe there is any more to it. Rugby does not allow for complacency - that is why teams want hard games before big games - to harden them up. If Pauls suggestion is that players who play test matches play with less intensity than at the RWC - having watched this sport for 35 odd years I just dont believe that.
On reflection the All Blacks were beaten by France because for them they played in 'no mans' territory. Meaning they never used the attacking skills they have mastered in the past 3 years - they gained huge and easy possession yet they placed themselves into a hole from where they couldn't win the game - they only played half a game, they forgot to attack using their best combinations. Making it possible for the French to defend against the All Blacks who were only running several phases before a break down. Where was the All Black 7,8,9 phase build up? No team can defend continually against that kind of footy. Remember the old games where Scotland and Wales turned on huge attacking performances through the backs and couldn't be stopped! Champagne rugby!
by Johan on October 15, 2007
Since the springboks have taken part in RWC, they have outperformed the AB's 3 out of 4 tournaments. In 1995, RSA won the cup;In 1999 RSA won the play-offs; In 2003 AB's advanced and RSA kicked out early in the quarters; In 2007, RSA advanced and AB's not. Before each tournament, the springboks did not come close to match the flair, talent and style of play dished up by the AB's. Why then does it happen that the RWC poses such a huge mental hurdle for the AB's to cross? Surely you cannot blame illness of players, as some still do with reference to the 1995 final.....Perhaps it has now been proven beyond any doubt that the AB's are simply poor RWC campainers, despite their unmatched achievements before and after each tournament.
by Ricky on October 15, 2007
I'd rather be the Worlds best for the 1459 days between the RWC than be the best for the 1 day of the RWC - Go the All Blacks!
by Minter Dial on October 15, 2007
I heard someone say the other day on the radio that because of the Super 14 format, there is rarely a do-die feeling in the matches played down under (only for the top 4 teams at the end of the sesason). This was used to excuse the ABs and Wallabies for buckling in the knockout tournament. Of course, it doesn't explain the RSA success. Any thoughts?
by whazba on October 15, 2007
WHO WON THE U21 WC THIS YEAR ?????
by Paul on October 16, 2007
Intensity of game When the stake increases, teams lift their games and raise intensity of the game. I think games like a Bedisloe Cup or Trination trophy decider has an edge that is not normally present in more test matches. I think games like that is one level higher in intensity. In World Cup finals, players lift even more, they went further, tackle harder than they knew possible. While it is easy to just look at how the All Blacks have come out short. I believe the French has played with purpose and tensenacity in that game. Both teams lifted their game, but French lifted much much more.
by Cynthia on October 16, 2007
I am sorry but I have to disagree about keeping Mr Henry on as Coach. Not only did he recondition our top players making them totally unfit for tough match play but he insisted on rotating the players with the result that no combinations had been forged and against the French everyone was panicking and playing their own individual game. He has to go, as soon as I heard about this reconditioning I knew that the cup was gone. And if Robbie Deans is lost to N.Z. rugby, well I will put my reputation on the line and say that Australia will win the 2011 World Cup.
by Paul on October 17, 2007
Cynthia, I total agree with you that Robbie Deans is integral to future All Blacks success. The irony is not lost to me that had Deans been allowed to stay on after 2003's loss, we probably would be in the final by now, but we are not. What I am arguing is coaches should be allowed to implement their learnings. Otherwise history looks to repeat itself in 2011 especially if all the existing coaches were sacked immediately after the cup. Yes, Robbie should take over as the All Black head coach at some point, but I would argue for a smooth transition and having GH and RD spending sometime together would enhance our chances next time.
by Brad on October 17, 2007
If i was Robbie Deans id go to Aussie why coach the all blacks when your going to get blamed and sacked for your players having no brains!
by John Christie on October 18, 2007
I think Mr Henry has some kind favouritism by the NZRU ie they like him! I've in two minds - if they keep him and he looses next time - he should be deported to Mongolia! Personally I'd feel furious with him. But if they keep him and he wins - then well Mr Henry is a national hero! - Stay safe sack him - and put Deans in :)
by cole drinnan on October 23, 2007
the all blacks will mostlikly win the 2011 rugby world cup and scotland will take the bid for 2015
by Anton on October 25, 2007
It is with a proud Springbok jersey i write to you from South Africa..Stop whining..U are worse than the English.1995 U came unstuck not poisoned..The only Sh*t on the ground was what was left when Joost single handedly tackled your Giant Jona Lomu.. U play great rugby and i am fond of you, specially when we manage to beat you.. and in that lies the difference..The Boks and any nation is proud when we beat a side..even Namibia..Yet you guys seem to take it for granted that You should have won by 30/40 points every game, and you even achieve it most of the time.Yet because of that you cant stand the intense 80min one point pressure specially in a play off,and your players who are not mentally trained for it(experience it) can not handle the heat and you panic. But i`ll go further than that.We need to play the Super 14 with European refs, the southern refs are biased against SA.so we play against a Aus ref and New Zeeland team and when we play against Aus it is an NZ ref..so we are stuck we have to grind
by Douglas on October 31, 2007
We need a different direction entirely. Having Robbie Deans as coach will be like having John Mitchell. We need a coach that will bring innovation, just like when Australia brought in Rod MacQueen, rather than persist with the same kind of rugby we've seen for several years. Knowing the NZRFU though, their philosophy is, if the coach failed, then we'll select his assistant. Since Wayne Smith already had his chance, don't be surprised if they choose Steve Hansen. Also, maybe we haven't won the World Cup since 1987 is because we haven't had a world Cup at home since.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *