We are all born with them. Our genes and the potential for sporting performance is written in them. How big are our lungs, our legs, arms; how good is our vision, our reflexes and how strong we are and so on are all dependent on our genes. It’s all laid down before we are even born. They are our passport to sporting success but how they translate to sporting performance also rests with our lifestyle, especially our nutritional and training habits.

The leaps and bounds in technology, though, may mean that in the future the whole issue of doping may become redundant, because there is the potential for doping to be forever hidden away and undetectable. Today, most of the known performance-enhancing drugs are detectable, although there are probably many others the testers just aren’t aware of. The power of gene therapy will make the whole testing system obsolete and impotent, especially when doping goes ‘inside the genes’.

Unless society can overcome the ethical and moral dilemmas regarding the privacy of every individual’s DNA, there will be no way of knowing who has been genetically enhanced or not through the use of proposed individual ‘gene maps’. These maps would document each person’s DNA fingerprint at birth and could be used as the baseline for gene doping testing in the future. In effect, it would be possible to see whether genes have been ‘cut and pasted’ or simply replaced with others to improve performance. And the can of worms would really open up if a young child or an embryo had been fiddled with. Under current doping laws they could not be sanctioned because they had not doped - someone had done it for (to) them.

Gene therapy is still in some ways an inexact science and while there have been some remarkable advances in research and even medical applications, the technology is fraught with as yet unknown risks, particularly therapies which may inadvertently turn on cancer-causing genes known as oncogenes or produce other manifestations or mutations such as two-headed animals. Ridiculous, alarming, even funny you may perhaps think. Well, think again. Researchers in Taiwan recently genetically ‘designed’ fish embryo to produce offspring containing the gene responsible for the muscle-wasting disease known as Muscular Dystrophy, which leads to an early death. Instead, their well-intentioned research ended up producing ‘two-headed’ fish. I mean one head on an athlete is enough but it would give new meaning perhaps to events such as synchronized swimming! It beggars belief that anyone other than those on their death beds would take such a risk?

With our genes being potentially the strongest performance enhancers, more than any known drug could be, it is obvious where sport’s biggest threat is coming from. How ironic that it is something we are ‘naturally’ endowed with that may ultimately wreck sport as we know it, rather than drugs. It could be debated, though, that drugs have already ruined sport. One thing is for sure - it seems that sport has now reached a point where it can’t exist without drugs, whether legal or not according to today’s mores and anti-doping rules.

While we could literally see the problems of cloning in human sport, what about in the horse-racing industry and even the dog-racing business, for that matter? The cloning of Dolly the sheep heralded a frightening reality, that the dead (as well as the living) can be either brought back to life or recreated.

And if we think this is just ‘pipe-dream’ stuff then we need to take a cold shower, for the first cloned horse was born in Italy in 2003 and another followed at Texas A&M University in 2005. Recently, a champion rodeo barrel horse was successfully cloned in the USA. Scamper, owned by barrel racer Charmayne James, was cloned and the offspring named Clayton was eerily a ‘carbon-copy’ of Scamper, save for white markings between its eyes. Clayton was born (engineered) after four failed attempts. Scamper turned James into the first million-dollar cowgirl and is the only horse in the Pro Rodeo Hall of Fame in the USA. James paid A&M University $150,000 to produce Clayton.

While ‘Clayton’ may not barrel race (indeed he may not be allowed to compete), what laws/rules are there preventing him from reproducing other quality barrel racers? Visions of I robot come quickly to mind (except this one is with horses).

If Scamper was cloned, what’s stopping the cloning of champion horses like Pharlap, Makybe Diva and Sea Biscuit? How much would it cost and how much would someone be prepared to pay for it? As there are probably no guarantees with the usual stud practice of mating champions, cloning could transform the whole breeding industry by providing a ‘sure bet’ And assuming it would be illegal to produce and race cloned horses, how could it ever be detected in any case?

It is a nightmare that is already happening. The sport of horse-racing (and rodeo) will be particularly vulnerable to cloning cheats rather than in human sport because an Ian Thorpe or a Lance Armstrong clone would be a dead giveaway, wouldn’t it? Not so for horses, though. Gene maps may have to be constructed of all previous and current racing champions to prevent the wholesale cloning of horses and the ‘ownership’ of DNA. It is entirely possible that horseracing may be a sport where a stable’s ‘DNA” is the key for success. Indeed, the international competitiveness of horseracing would lose any meaning because it would now become a ‘corporate’ game with owners covertly bidding for the best DNA from the best champions to produce its ‘cloned’ champions.

No matter whether we are talking about humans or animals, gene doping will cross all doping boundaries because it has the potential to permanently change the body, not just temporarily like conventional drugs. And it will affect all sports. Even genes responsible for height, weight, metabolism, balance, nerve, vision when identified will become performance-enhancing even in the most innocuous sports that don’t require great feats of strength or endurance like pistol shooting, archery, gymnastics etc. Gene technology will challenge society on many levels and it will force to question what it means to be human. It may well force us to ask another question: ‘What does sport mean?’ At the moment it appears that no one really knows where gene technology is taking the human race, let alone human sporting performance.

Human biological evolution has taken billions of years to develop. We have it within our power now to unravel perhaps even change the notion of what it is to be human. Do we now also apply the same question to animals such as racehorses? If we can’t answer the latter now, and society needs to because it is happening now, then how could society possibly answer the same question when it comes to humans and humans in sport?

Robin Parisotto is a former Australian Institute of Sport Researcher and author of 'Blood Sports – the inside dope on drugs in sport'.