Home > Tennis > Andy Murray's 2009 Grand Slam ambitions: He's got to be serious!
by Mark Weatherup on 30 November 2008
Email this Article (3) Comments
Free £25 bet when you register at
Murray lost out to Nikolay Davydenko in the semi-final in Shanghai after tiring himself out beating Roger Federer in an epic three-hour encounter the day before.
In previous years I have never been a massive supporter of Murray due to his erratic performances, injuries and dodgy serve. Thankfully he spent time working on his physical condition before the start of the season with rigorous fitness and weight training sessions.
As a result of some serious hard work, it all came together in the second half of the year when he proved just how gifted he is, and I am now totally behind the seriously talented Scot. I would go as far to say that he is the best player in the world at the moment as he is able to play at the highest level for longer than anyone else due to his phenomenal fitness levels.
Once he got the clay-court season out of the way there was no stopping him as he delivered a number of amazing performances, coming back to win from seemingly perilous positions. If there was a tennis dictionary, under the definition of grinder it would just read 'Andrew Murray'.
There is absolutely no question that the turning point of Murray's year came when he fought back from two sets down against Richard Gasquet at Wimbledon. This match had the most amazing atmosphere I have ever experienced with the crowd, for the first time, really interacting and feeding off Murray's every move.
His aggression and fighting spirit sent the crowd into frenzy particularly when he broke Gasquet as the Frenchman was serving for the match. In the fourth and fifth sets I have never heard a Wimbledon crowd making so much noise for one player and then going as far as to actually boo the other for no apparent reason.
Murray's bicep-showing victory celebration will forever be an iconic moment in sporting history and I think after the victory all his previous bad press was put to bed. He was dominated by Rafael Nadal in the quarter-final but the Spaniard was simply untouchable at that time.
After a month off he then defeated Novak Djokovic twice in two weeks, which was a sure sign of his new found confidence. At the US Open he then conquered his nemesis Nadal, a player who he had never beaten.
Unfortunately, after playing his best ever tennis to defeat the Spaniard, the very next day he had to contest the final against Federer. There was no way he was ever going to able to play unbelievable tennis two days in a row and he was easily beaten. I think the score would have been very different had he had a day to prepare himself mentally and physically.
He then won the next two tournaments he entered, Madrid and St. Petersburg, and this was a completely different Murray we were seeing compared to last year. He has always been a fighter, as this is his natural instinct, but in previous years I don't think he really knew exactly what he was fighting for.
The difference this year was that he set his goals, got the tough physical training work done and put in extra hours on the practice court which installed a new self belief that he could compete with the very best in the world.
If he continues improving and keeps injury free, I'm sure that his ultimate dream of being a Grand Slam champion will come true in the next couple of years.
Comments (3)
by simon studd on December 01, 2008
Fantastic article. Really good read. Looking forward to your next peice.
by tim henman on December 01, 2008
Henman Hill will never be murray mount, lets get it right, murray is over rated and i will never take down my henman posters for that neanderthol of a scot. He has potential yes, but lets not forget hes no wonder kid, nadal is younger, better and more successful, by FAR. Also, when murray plays, he cant get the atmosphere in the stadium like henman could, henman will always be the greatest, most exciting and most enjoyable/nerv racking english player to ever grace the atp tour, cheers
ALSO, murrays career will consist of him being overshadowed like henman's was, for example. henman always had samps, agassi, hews to contend with... murray has feds, djocks, davidenks & nads. ok he may beat them in some minor tournament, but when it comes down to it, he is never going to win wimbledon due to feds or nads, he may win US but unlikely due to feds, he will never win french due to nads and he might win AUS but djocks or tsonga or davs may get in his way. AND Whats so good about murray anyway, nadal is about his age and has won a riduculous about of grand slams & tournaments and is unbeaten on clay in what, 10000 matches? Henman readhed 4th in the ATP race in 2002... Greg rusedski (rusedks) got to the US open final... so why is everyone bigging up murray? Cheers
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Owen's no gamble - Liverpool's former goal-den boy could be a Manchester United bargain
Galaxies apart: Why David Beckham is NOT the pride of Landon (Landon Donovan, that is)
TEN reasons why South Africa's Peter de Villiers is rugby union's greatest
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.