Home > Tennis > Why Andy Roddick's bid for a second US Open crown will fall short
by Vanessa Lockhart on 04 August 2007
Email this Article (8) Comments
Free £10 bet when you register at
Andy Roddick's form looks good...but not great. Good will get him to the quarters but not beyond. With so many emerging talents in the men's game, only great will take him further.
When Andy came on the scene, he was a swashbuckling youngster. Bright shirts, a backwards cap and a peacock strut. Now we see Andy in Wimbledon regalia at most tournaments, bill facing forward more often than not. Brad Gilbert gave him some maturity, which was surely needed. Jimmy Connors is giving him some variety, which is sorely needed. But some natural spark is not evident right now. The spark that saw him win three tournaments his first year out and beat Pete Sampras along the way has dimmed with...expectations? Pressure? Failure to evolve?
Remember back when Andy was still with Gilbert, who was trying to get him to move forward in the court more? Andy missed a volley during a match and yelled: "That's the stupidest thing I ever heard." Funny how Connors is telling him essentially the same thing but Andy is only now ready to learn it. Sampras was an excellent baseline player, but his philosophy seemed to be: "Why run yourself ragged back there when you can just bang in a big serve and finish the point on the second shot at the net?" Roddick, hailed as the next coming of Sampras because of his serve, needs to embrace that philosophy wholeheartedly.
Connors also has Andy using a slice backhand more often, which is excellent and essential but again, since Andy seems to go to it a bit too often now, his natural instincts are not kicking in. Never one to rip backhand winners all over the place, the slice still mutes his aggressiveness, especially on the return of serve. He hasn't yet found his right balance between the safer play and the grip-it-and-rip-it style that works so well when it's on.
Winning the big ones takes more than talent and preparation; you also have to have the attitude and with Andy's game in flux, he doesn't have the attitude to win the US Open this year. Nobody picked Sampras to win it in 2002, no one picked Venus or Serena to win majors this year - but they all had the determination to do it. Sampras was not going to retire until he won one more major. Serena was "ready to die on the court." Venus, well, she just decided to win. But the last times we saw Roddick really leave it on the court were his 21-19 fifth set at the 2003 Aussie Open against El Aynaoui and his inspired performance against Roger Federer in the 2004 Wimbledon final.Roddick does have the guts and the gumption somewhere down there, but he has to become comfortable enough with the more varied game he's learning to get his strut and his swagger back. Only then will he assume his rightful place as a top threat to win majors.
Comments (8)
by Madhusudan on August 04, 2007
With Roger and Rafa leading the way, Roddick has no chances. Roddick is languishing in the category of the others. Pity Gilbert couldnt help him much.
by Calendargirl on August 04, 2007
Roddick's guts and gumption in playing on behalf of the U.S.in Davis Cup this year and aggravating an existing injury says to me that he does indeed have the right stuff. (while Federer and Nadal deserted their own country's Davis Cup teams.) I believe that Roddick's talent, training and drive will come together at the right time for him.
by Martin on August 04, 2007
Roddick will go as far as the last four but will struggle to be a finalist. The likes of Federer, Nadal and Murray amongst others are too far ahead of him.
by Owen Beddall on August 04, 2007
I think the fact that Andy is diversifying his coaching from Gilbert to Connors shows his commitment to change and evolution. He is a natural and I think he is building on that to win another slam. Lets not forget after all, I think he knows what it takes as he has won the tournament before in 2003.
by Stuart on August 04, 2007
I think Roddick needs to mix it up a bit he has always been a great player, lets face it you don't get to number 1 being a poor player I just think the other players now what he is going to do.
by Jenn on August 05, 2007
Andy Roddick is never going to win another major...
by deb on August 05, 2007
As Madhusudan said Roddick is 'languishing in the category of the others' the only difference being he's continually criticized for it while other players are applauded for even reaching the top 10.
by A on August 23, 2007
I thought Andy and Gilbert were a great combo. He won several events before the '03 Open, it's a shame they split later on. He had the winning attitude w/ Gilbert, but don't I see that anymore.
Add your comment here
PERSONAL ABUSE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
First Name
Last Name
Email
Heading
Display your favourite sport or football team badge with your comment.
Sport
League
Team
Comment *
Please enter the text you see in the picture into the textbox below. *
Can Liverpool cope without Torres over Christmas? Manchester United and Chelsea are watching!
Messi, Lampard, Kaka - who can get the Golden Ball off Manchester United's Cristiano Ronaldo?
Vegas jackpot! Pacquiao shoots for boxing immortality as De La Hoya defends his legacy
Arsenal Champions League Chelsea Cricket news Euroleague Fantasy football Football news Formula 1 Liverpool Manchester United NBA Newcastle United Premier League Sports news Tottenham Hotspur Transfer rumours Twenty20 UEFA UEFA Champions League
© SportBuzz All rights reserved 2008 Sportingo- Sports News & Sports Articles site. Sportingo delivers fresh sports news and analysis by fans-Football News, Tennis News, Rugby Union News, Rugby League, Cricket News, Cycling News, Basketball News and other Sports TV. XML Sitemap 2008.