In the rapidly evolving society in which we live, most would think that equality of sexes is a solved and ancient issue. The truth, however, is not as pretty. The concept of obedient little women overwhelmed the world to such a degree that until recently, female tennis players got lower prize money than their male counterparts. This issue was excused in various ridiculous ways that were probably reasoned by the male organisers of events.

It is now the end of 2007 and, after years of courageous fighting, all four Grand Slam tournaments finally pay equal prize money. Maybe the fact that equality of sexes is a sensible and wise idea finally clicked. Maybe the organisers thought females would give up and accept the macho domineering attitude (not in a million years!) but were obviously proved wrong. Perhaps the organisers just thought, “hey, how about being fair for a change?” Whatever it is that changed their obsolete and absurd way of reasoning was very fine news, not only for female athletes but also for the world as a whole – it means intelligent progress.

It finally can be said out loud that tennis is a fair and square sport. Nevertheless, it must be noted that this achievement has not been easily attained. Many inspirational and illustrious players have to be thanked for their valour and nerve, for expressing their ideas for the good of all women. American tennis icon Billy Jean King persistently argued against sexism of any kind. Another great tennis star, Martina Navratilova, fought fiercely for equality in the game and stated that “whenever there is inequality, it doesn't matter whether it is a penny or £100,000. It is about the principle – and the principle is wrong.”

Similarly, recent tennis champions such as the Williams sisters, Amelie Mauresmo and Maria Sharapova have also stood their ground and were always strongly against inequality.

'The women’s game is more passionate since the audience always seems more emotionally involved. Women’s tennis is just as worthy and admirable as men's tennis, therefore, it is right to give equal prize money'

Until last year, the four Grand Slam tournaments did not pay equal prize money. While the US Open has had parity since 1973, the Australian Open was dubious about the issue and could not give a straight answer. This meant that equality was an on and off thing since 1984. The French Open started paying equal prize money for the first time in 2006, yet this was only done for the finalists (could be just penny-pinching). The other women players had to accept lower rewards. As for Wimbledon, the tournament considered the most prestigious and elegant in the world did not pay equal prize money until this year. This illustrates the extent of recent inequality in the women’s game, in what is supposed to be a modern society (yeah, right!).

Women’s equality is not about economic issues, it is about treating a human with the respect and dignity they deserve for playing the same sport, under the same conditions, rules, norms and circumstances. Equality is a much larger picture than just tennis equality, it’s about being fair no matter the sex.

The sceptics believe that women deserve to be paid less since they do not play five-set matches and therefore do not make as much of an effort. Others doubters claim women’s tennis is not as entertaining or skilful. However, women’s matches have proven to be quality instead of quantity. The women’s game is played at a slower pace. This means the ball can actually be seen in play for longer times.